Well, if it's "church tax" then it's OK by me, insofar as it's a voluntary tax (though the fact that the state collects it on behalf of the church is problematic). If members of that church disagree with the contribution to a cause, then it's an internal matter for that church (and a test of how democratic it is, perhaps).

_{It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II}

Church members fees (church tax) fund a budget that among other things has an item "democracy education and support of democratic initiatives". The money was taken from this title of the budget. The provost okayed that. The synod wasn't asked (would have been optional). The bishop wasn't asked either (optional again).