It is a non-factual (and therefore, according to you, not amenable to being repressed as misinformation) religious doctrine (which parents according to you must therefore be free to impress upon their children), which requires systematic lying about fact-claims to support.

I'm curious how you propose to square that circle, because suppressing factual misinformation will in this case quite clearly also suppress a particular religious doctrine as collateral damage. Or collateral advantage, for those who, like I, find it a loathsome doctrine which does not have any place in civilized society.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.