Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
No, I would not agree with that. And I still find remarkable that "but when they start coercing others for whatever imagined reason to give up their natural right to think critically" is what springs to your mind in a debate of religious freedom.
by Katrin on Mon Feb 3rd, 2014 at 02:56:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
actually i was thinking about every time a kid is told to 'believe' even when his mind questions the canonised view, such as do animals have souls for example.

or that if allah had wanted women to cover their hair he would have had them born veiled.

or why it was ok for jesus to kick the moneylenders off the temple steps but we have to treat banksters with kid gloves.

or that liberation theology perhaps wasn't a commie plot.

etc...

that you find it remarkable is what i find remarkable!

religion should encourage love, not be used to hold women back in the middle ages.

i am sure we can agree on that.

much more important than a piece of cloth perhaps.

'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Mon Feb 3rd, 2014 at 05:31:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
melo:
actually i was thinking about every time a kid is told to 'believe' even when his mind questions the canonised view, such as do animals have souls for example

Well, I don't do "canonised view". I am searching my memory, but I can't think of any people who would treat children like that, and I guess if they did, it would have the opposite result from what they intended. It is very disturbing to see that this is the default religious education for you.

melo:

religion should encourage love, not be used to hold women back in the middle ages.

i am sure we can agree on that

Yes, indeed.

melo:

much more important than a piece of cloth perhaps

Definitely. BUT: as important as the fight against the injustice of taking a woman's freedom to choose whatever cloth she wants.

by Katrin on Mon Feb 3rd, 2014 at 06:05:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
here's the crazy part... i agree with you, jake, migeru, tbg, dodo, eurogreen and everyone who has contributed valid opinions in this thread.

yet i don't sense any common ground that's well articulated. put the segments together and there's a whole orange of progressivism here.

the need for aggression mystifies me...  

i am grateful to you and the commenters for the attention to details i had not thought of, but we need unity to be effective, and hope we realise all these opinions can meet in the middle quite unpolemically if we remember what our common goals are, instead of playing into the PTB's hands by harping on our differences.

it seems that the mere mention of religion gets too many hackles up to stay civil, and that's not only sad but unnecessary, as without diversity-in-unity we fail against the wingnut idiocracy, every time.

their solidarity unites fine under 'greed-for-profit'... in hatred of minorities and the fomentation of division between us.

gays, jews, rom, women, immigrants, believers. why is it so easy to set us at each others' throats?

ET is a magnificent microcosm.

'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Mon Feb 3rd, 2014 at 07:55:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
melo:
it seems that the mere mention of religion gets too many hackles up to stay civil, and that's not only sad but unnecessary, as without diversity-in-unity we fail against the wingnut idiocracy, every time.

Good point and pointed observation. I think it is to a large extent about identity (and as I have argued previously, a heavier part of identity then hobbies, but lighter then race or gender). And as identities are largely defined by their opposite (can't have left without right, can't have germans without the french) the self-identification as anything on the religious scale demands a definition of the other. And there is where it gets tricky, because one groups definition of the other rarely matches that groups definition of itself.

Me, I have grown up in a non-religious household in a pretty non-religious society. I was tought the christian myths, but there was no problem with me accepting them as just stories. School was sometimes in church (good place for singing), but it was like being in a museum or other odd, old place. I have never been forced into performing religious rituals, though I could if I wanted. I was however brought up in beliving that you don't mock the religious kids. (Because you don't mock the other kids. (Because mom said so.))

Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se

by A swedish kind of death on Tue Feb 4th, 2014 at 09:45:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Katrin:
It is very disturbing to see that this is the default religious education for you.

ha, that's the tip of the iceberg. what's far more disturbing is seeing chaplains preparing soldiers to get ready to 'do their duty' on the battlefield, or seeing how much suffering the catholics cause with their blockheaded refusal to acknowledge birth control, condemning women to AIDS and millions to misery.

add the centuries of false god-endorsed crusades and inquisitions and surely it becomes obvious why there are so many who come out in hives at the very idea of religion.

and thankfully a few who acknowledge how important the different churches have been in the anti-nuke movement, amongst other important issues like racial equality.

in the face of what we are staring down right now we need everyone we can get pulling for a better world, the more the merrier. it makes baby jesus cry to see how much friction and dissent are hardwired into our quarrelsome DNA.

i know because i deal with it in my own self every day, and others on this blog have seen me act out around religious/spiritual issues, so i am preaching above all to myself here!

...actually i hope i am not preaching at all, just pointing out the obvious.

'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Mon Feb 3rd, 2014 at 08:14:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I can't think of any people who would treat children like that

Unfortunately, most religious people I knew were like that (and I emphasize I mean 'normal' people; I had very little to do with pastors and priests). Stressing that humans have souls while other animals lack them was a particular point of confrontation I remember from childhood.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Tue Feb 4th, 2014 at 07:31:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
My own anti-epiphany happened in my first year at school when the - really quite avuncular, kindly and civilised - teacher assured us with a straight face that 'Thou shalt not kill' didn't apply if god had ordered you to defend your country.

I'm beginning to wonder what kind of religious ghetto Katrin lives in, because it so clearly has almost nothing in common with the majority experience of religion.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Feb 4th, 2014 at 08:26:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The "religious ghetto" is the Lutheran Church. As mainstream as you can get here. I am not saying that the intolerant or overzealous weren't there somewhere--but in my experience they aren't dominant to the exclusion of diversity of views or the abuse of children's independence of thought. All differences and conflicts considered: it is no way like what you describe as your experience.
by Katrin on Tue Feb 4th, 2014 at 10:13:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]
If I am allowed to start yet another sidetrack: do you have an explanation for the fact that the German Lutheran Church is losing (tax-paying) members even faster than the Catholics? This was always a mystery to me: IMHO the main reason for the dwindling of the Catholics in almost all Catholic-majority areas of Europe is the ugliness and viciousness of the clergy, while the German Lutheran clergy is quite the opposite. The only explanation I could come up with was that modern German Lutheranism makes ditching religion too easy by voiding all the compulsion (including the threat of social expulsion). That is, with only a little exaggeration: it became too tolerant to sustain itself.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Tue Feb 4th, 2014 at 02:55:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, that is it. You really have no disadvantage for not being a member.
by Katrin on Tue Feb 4th, 2014 at 04:35:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Same with Church of Sweden. Pretty much all publicity is bad publicity for them as it reminds people to leave. They had a campaign for people to vote in the Church election which reached many, prompting people to leave. Not that the campaign was bad or that there was not voting options for every taste, but just by reminding people that they are members.

Similar with the Swedish royalties. As long as they just do some ritual ribbon cutting they are popular, but when they do stuff that puts them in the spotlight - even positive things like weddings or kids - their popularity goes down as people are reminded of what a strange institution it is.

Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se

by A swedish kind of death on Tue Feb 4th, 2014 at 04:52:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes. Voting rights (but most people don't vote anyway), and of the two godparents of a child at least one must be a member (but one is enought), and in order to get married in church one of the partners must be a church member (but you don't marry that often in your life). I think that's it with the list of disadvantages.
by Katrin on Tue Feb 4th, 2014 at 05:09:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Now now. I already wrote about this in the other sub-threads. She comes from the "ghetto" of northern Germany, where mostly Lutheran and to a great part grass-roots Christian groups participated in underground movements against the Third Reich, more recently participated heavily in the peace and anti-nuclear movements of the 1970s and 1980s, also played a major role in East German pro-democracy protests before Reunification, still form a major part of protests against neo-Nazi gatherings (often alongside communists), and are a loud voice on the side of refugees against xenophobes. The acrimony in the debate in this diary is because you in Britain and France and elsewhere have no local experience of such Christian public activism and are ignorant of it elsewhere (beyond Germany, I recall some similar examples in Italy and the USA), while Katrin seems ignorant of the fact that this type of Christian activism is not that typical elsewhere in Europe.

To add another regional flavour: in my region, there was also some contribution to pro-democracy movements around 1989 (more from the Catholic Church in Poland and more from small Protestant groups in Hungary for example), but since then, religion-based political activism is mostly several times uglier than in France, and even the social activism – that is, charity work, mostly with the homeless – doesn't go along with a social agenda but a didain for those helped. (I know Calvinist charity workers who took an overseas holiday on charity money and consider the needy whom they help sinners.)

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Tue Feb 4th, 2014 at 02:46:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
For Italy, see cattocomunismo.
by gk (gk (gk quattro due due sette @gmail.com)) on Tue Feb 4th, 2014 at 04:36:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
thanks for welcome context, DoDo.

'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Tue Feb 4th, 2014 at 06:01:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]
He could have just told you that it was a mistranslation, and that it really should be something like "Thou shalt not commit manslaughter". And there are plenty of verses telling you the opposite (see Psalm 137:9 for one of the most notorious).
by gk (gk (gk quattro due due sette @gmail.com)) on Tue Feb 4th, 2014 at 04:48:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series