The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
or that if allah had wanted women to cover their hair he would have had them born veiled.
or why it was ok for jesus to kick the moneylenders off the temple steps but we have to treat banksters with kid gloves.
or that liberation theology perhaps wasn't a commie plot.
etc...
that you find it remarkable is what i find remarkable!
religion should encourage love, not be used to hold women back in the middle ages.
i am sure we can agree on that.
much more important than a piece of cloth perhaps. 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
actually i was thinking about every time a kid is told to 'believe' even when his mind questions the canonised view, such as do animals have souls for example
Well, I don't do "canonised view". I am searching my memory, but I can't think of any people who would treat children like that, and I guess if they did, it would have the opposite result from what they intended. It is very disturbing to see that this is the default religious education for you.
melo:
religion should encourage love, not be used to hold women back in the middle ages. i am sure we can agree on that
i am sure we can agree on that
Yes, indeed.
much more important than a piece of cloth perhaps
Definitely. BUT: as important as the fight against the injustice of taking a woman's freedom to choose whatever cloth she wants.
yet i don't sense any common ground that's well articulated. put the segments together and there's a whole orange of progressivism here.
the need for aggression mystifies me...
i am grateful to you and the commenters for the attention to details i had not thought of, but we need unity to be effective, and hope we realise all these opinions can meet in the middle quite unpolemically if we remember what our common goals are, instead of playing into the PTB's hands by harping on our differences.
it seems that the mere mention of religion gets too many hackles up to stay civil, and that's not only sad but unnecessary, as without diversity-in-unity we fail against the wingnut idiocracy, every time.
their solidarity unites fine under 'greed-for-profit'... in hatred of minorities and the fomentation of division between us.
gays, jews, rom, women, immigrants, believers. why is it so easy to set us at each others' throats?
ET is a magnificent microcosm. 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
Good point and pointed observation. I think it is to a large extent about identity (and as I have argued previously, a heavier part of identity then hobbies, but lighter then race or gender). And as identities are largely defined by their opposite (can't have left without right, can't have germans without the french) the self-identification as anything on the religious scale demands a definition of the other. And there is where it gets tricky, because one groups definition of the other rarely matches that groups definition of itself.
Me, I have grown up in a non-religious household in a pretty non-religious society. I was tought the christian myths, but there was no problem with me accepting them as just stories. School was sometimes in church (good place for singing), but it was like being in a museum or other odd, old place. I have never been forced into performing religious rituals, though I could if I wanted. I was however brought up in beliving that you don't mock the religious kids. (Because you don't mock the other kids. (Because mom said so.)) Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
It is very disturbing to see that this is the default religious education for you.
ha, that's the tip of the iceberg. what's far more disturbing is seeing chaplains preparing soldiers to get ready to 'do their duty' on the battlefield, or seeing how much suffering the catholics cause with their blockheaded refusal to acknowledge birth control, condemning women to AIDS and millions to misery.
add the centuries of false god-endorsed crusades and inquisitions and surely it becomes obvious why there are so many who come out in hives at the very idea of religion.
and thankfully a few who acknowledge how important the different churches have been in the anti-nuke movement, amongst other important issues like racial equality.
in the face of what we are staring down right now we need everyone we can get pulling for a better world, the more the merrier. it makes baby jesus cry to see how much friction and dissent are hardwired into our quarrelsome DNA.
i know because i deal with it in my own self every day, and others on this blog have seen me act out around religious/spiritual issues, so i am preaching above all to myself here!
...actually i hope i am not preaching at all, just pointing out the obvious. 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
Unfortunately, most religious people I knew were like that (and I emphasize I mean 'normal' people; I had very little to do with pastors and priests). Stressing that humans have souls while other animals lack them was a particular point of confrontation I remember from childhood. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
I'm beginning to wonder what kind of religious ghetto Katrin lives in, because it so clearly has almost nothing in common with the majority experience of religion.
Similar with the Swedish royalties. As long as they just do some ritual ribbon cutting they are popular, but when they do stuff that puts them in the spotlight - even positive things like weddings or kids - their popularity goes down as people are reminded of what a strange institution it is. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
To add another regional flavour: in my region, there was also some contribution to pro-democracy movements around 1989 (more from the Catholic Church in Poland and more from small Protestant groups in Hungary for example), but since then, religion-based political activism is mostly several times uglier than in France, and even the social activism – that is, charity work, mostly with the homeless – doesn't go along with a social agenda but a didain for those helped. (I know Calvinist charity workers who took an overseas holiday on charity money and consider the needy whom they help sinners.) *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 10 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 1 6 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 3 32 comments
by Oui - Sep 6 3 comments
by Oui - Sep 196 comments
by Oui - Sep 19
by Oui - Sep 18
by Oui - Sep 1727 comments
by Oui - Sep 154 comments
by Oui - Sep 151 comment
by Oui - Sep 1315 comments
by Oui - Sep 13
by Oui - Sep 124 comments
by Oui - Sep 1010 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 103 comments
by Oui - Sep 10
by Oui - Sep 92 comments
by Oui - Sep 84 comments
by Oui - Sep 715 comments
by Oui - Sep 72 comments
by Oui - Sep 63 comments