Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
I think it varies.

In the UK the macho and misogynistic attitudes of unions meant that in the 60s women were 10% more likely to vote Tory than men were. Now, with women's rights being more a Labour value, women are more likely to vote labour than men.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Jun 4th, 2014 at 03:14:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I am curious how misogynistic logic or macho instincts indeed impact women's decision making.
by das monde on Wed Jun 4th, 2014 at 04:25:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Intuitively, I would say that it either makes them submissive or tough and ruthless. Both right-wing principles.

It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
by eurogreen on Wed Jun 4th, 2014 at 06:28:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The women greatest power is to (strongly) accept or reject. Logic or balanced motives are more a social play than a real criterion, on a large scale.

Compared to conservatives, the progressives are ignorant about the power of hierarchy-based emotions. Primitive powers meet less challenge, times are getting more troublesome - and progressives do not offer own power centers.  

by das monde on Wed Jun 4th, 2014 at 07:14:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I think what I'm saying is that in a macho and misogynistic society, hierarchy is maintained by the explicit threat of violence, or by actual violence. This is not conducive to the development of co-operative and win-win strategies, which is something that women generally bring to the mix, when they are able.

It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
by eurogreen on Wed Jun 4th, 2014 at 09:39:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Conservative 'logic' generally comes down to 'Who has power?'

E.g. posts by our very own Santiago always justify power as an end in itself that justifies every means.

It's purely herd logic. There are alpha animals asserting dominance through violence, fear-of-the-other-herds, and simple lying for personal benefit. The rest of the herd is supposed to follow.

It's not purely a gender thing. That kind of 'logic' appeals strongly to older males who feel they lack power.

Old left logic was framed as a power struggle against the alphas. It was sticky and successful because it made sense in herd terms.

Modern progressive logic is about trying to understand cause and effect, and to engineer workable solutions to problems.  

Probably only about a quarter of the population can even begin to think like this, and only about 5% of the population is any good at it.

Politically, it's not a winner.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Jun 4th, 2014 at 09:41:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Top Diaries

Less Truss than Trump

by Frank Schnittger - Aug 3

Empire Building South-East Asia

by Oui - Jul 12

Habeck Energie Krise

by Oui - Jul 19

Grid Enhancing Technologies

by gmoke - Jul 10

Occasional Series