Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sun Apr 26th, 2015 at 11:27:39 AM EST
America has fewer and larger farms. Here's why that matters | Grist
So, why does farm size matter? As the total number of farms goes down, the number of big* farms is going up -- and this shift hurts rural America. According to an analysis by Food and Water Watch: "Communities with more medium- and smaller-sized farms have more shared prosperity, including higher incomes, lower unemployment, and lower income inequality, than communities with larger farms tied to often-distant agribusinesses."

In strictly economic terms, U.S. agriculture has followed a pretty unsurprising path. Better technology leads to greater crop yields, which in turn mean lower prices and larger farms. Our economic system distorts competition and fosters consolidation -- and then we act surprised when farmers follow the rules of the game in order to survive.

Today, we have a ton of tiny farms -- and yet when it comes to land, "the top 10 percent of farms in terms of size account for more than 70 percent of cropland in the United States; the top 2.2 percent alone takes up more than a third," wrote Roberto A. Ferdman in The Washington Post.

The editors of the fantastic book Food and the Mid-Level Farm show how that has paved the road toward an increasingly polarized farm-scape:

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sun Apr 26th, 2015 at 12:03:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There are two things here I feel separating out.
The first is the technologically driven consolidation. One farmer can, with better tech, manage more land effectively and responsibly. Keeping this from happening just means each farmer is involuntarily holding down a part time job, and not utilizing his or her machinery and education to the full extent possible, which is irresponsible.

The second trend is corporations buying up everything in sight and employing people to work the land. This is just modern feudalism, wealth extraction and all. Not a trend to be encouraged. I mean, in theory a corporate approach would be a good way to spread best practices, but in actuality? Not so much.

by Thomas on Tue Apr 28th, 2015 at 04:16:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Also, government policies (including benefits and financing) have been geared toward replacing family farming with corporate farming for over six decades.
by rifek on Wed Apr 29th, 2015 at 11:43:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Flameproof falcons and hawks

A Cooper's hawk, found in Greater Vancouver, is the most polluted wild bird that has been found anywhere in the world. A team of Canadian researchers made this startling discovery while analyzing liver samples from birds of prey that were discovered either injured or dead in the Vancouver area.

The levels of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in the contaminated Cooper's hawk were 196 parts per million, significantly higher than those recorded in birds found either in cities in California or in an electronic waste site in China. PBDEs are a group of chemicals that act as flame retardants and were once used widely in computers, stereos, televisions, vehicles, carpets and furniture.

Although many of the PBDEs have been banned since the 2000s in Canada, they continue to accumulate in landfill sites where people dispose of PBDE-rich items. In British Columbia's Fraser River delta, for example, the quantity of PBDEs has doubled every four years over the past four decades. This can have a significant effect on the bird populations that live nearby.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sun Apr 26th, 2015 at 12:10:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Siemens CEO badmouths Energiewende - 100% renewable - Renewables International

I was a bit surprised to read (in German) Siemens' CEO Joe Kaeser comments in Houston yesterday. After saying that his firm was "born in Germany, raised in Europe, and at home across the world" (note: my back translation from the German, not his original), he apparently added this:

"If you want to influence a country's energy policy, you just have to do the opposite of what's being done in Germany. Germany is subsidizing renewable energy to the tune of nearly 500 billion euros guaranteed. I hope that Germany at least manages to export wind turbines. But supporting photovoltaics in Germany makes about as much sense as planting pineapples in Alaska."

(Also note that this is a back translation from indirect speech, so his original wording - which I have not seen - may be somewhat different.)

Have I mentioned that Siemens has quite a small share of the German wind power market? Yes, I believe I did. Siemens did not even enter the wind sector until 2004, when it took over Bonus AS of Denmark. The firm apparently knows a lot about photovoltaics, for it focused on concentrated solar power more than PV, partly within the Desertec project, which did not pan out (note to Joe: the Sahara is probably too dry for pineapple plantations). The global PV market is set to skyrocket from now on, but Siemens has nothing to sell.

And let's not forget Siemens' recent sales brochure, which it tried to pass off as a serious recommendation for the Energiewende. Or the ridiculous claim that the 2011 nuclear phaseout would raise German power prices fivefold.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sun Apr 26th, 2015 at 12:13:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
.. But solar in Germany is daft. If you are intent on powering civilization from renewable energy you have to respect the physical geography you want to extract energy from. Winter happens.

A sane renewable energy policy for Germany of the same financial magnitude as the solar tarrif commitments -

Desertec and HVDC, North Sea Wind and Hydraulic Hydro storage a-la Eduard Heind for example, would have displaced far more fossil fuel from the grid. Heck, just building the storage facility and leveling out the load on the french reactors would have done that.

by Thomas on Tue Apr 28th, 2015 at 04:25:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Sustainable Ecosystems and Community News: Mountains warming faster than expected

High elevation environments around the world may be warming much faster than previously thought, according to members of an international research team including Raymond Bradley, director of the Climate System Research Center at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. They call for more aggressive monitoring of temperature changes in mountain regions and more attention to the potential consequences of warming.

"Elevation-dependent warming is a poorly observed phenomenon that requires urgent attention to ensure that potentially important changes in high mountain environments are adequately monitored by the global observational network," say members of the Mountain Research Initiative Working Group in the current issue of Nature Climate Change.

High mountains are the major water source for large numbers of people living at lower elevations, so the social and economic consequences of enhanced warming in mountain regions could be large, the researchers add.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sun Apr 26th, 2015 at 12:27:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Five reasons why the wind industry will make your day - Wind Energy - Renewables International

Let's face it - extreme weather, floods and droughts, melting ice and disappearing species as a result of climate change are enough to ruin anyone's day. So here's some good news for a change, brought to you by the wind industry.

1. Wind power had a fantastic year in 2014, led by China which installed more than 23 Gigawatts (GW) of clean renewable wind energy, enough to power about 25 million Chinese homes. The industry set a new global record with a total of more than 51 GW installed in a single year. Our new projections in our hot off the press Global Wind Report show that the trend will continue for the rest of the decade, with annual installations reaching 60 GW/year by 2018, and supplying 6-7% of global electricity supply by 2020, up from about 3% at present. Denmark already got 39% of its electricity from wind last year; Spain 20%, Germany almost 10%, the US 5%. The even better news is that most of the new growth now is in emerging markets, whereemissions growth is slowing because of wind, solar and other renewables, and increasing energy efficiency.

2. Wind power is now the cheapest way to add new power generation to the grid in a long and growing list of countries: Brazil, South Africa, Mexico, Turkey, New Zealand, Australia and in large portions of the US and China. In fact, most of the growth in 2014 was not driven by climate policy, but rather by wind power's competitiveness, by its contributions to energy security, price stability, and the economic development and jobs that it provides. Add to that the need to rid the large cities of the developing world from the choking smog which threatens to make them unlivable, and wind power is increasingly becoming the power option of choice for large scale, clean electricity to power economic development. In the second quarter of this year wind will surpass nuclear in terms of total installed capacity globally, although it will be a few more years before it surpasses nuclear in terms of production.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sun Apr 26th, 2015 at 12:28:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]


A society committed to the notion that government is always bad will have bad government. And it doesn't have to be that way. — Paul Krugman
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Apr 27th, 2015 at 12:31:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Shell lobbied to undermine EU renewables targets, documents reveal | Environment | The Guardian

Now documents released to the Guardian under freedom of information laws show that as far back as October 2011, Shell had begun lobbying the Barroso, who was succeeded by Jean-Claude Juncker last November, to scrap the bloc's existing formula for linking carbon-cutting goals with binding renewable energy laws.

Shell argued that a market-led strategy of gas expansion would save Europe €500bn (£358bn) in its transition to a low carbon energy system, compared to an approach centred on renewables. "Gas is good for Europe, and Europe is good at gas," the firm's upstream executive director, Malcolm Brinded wrote in a five-page letter to Barroso.

"Shell believes the EU should focus on reduction of greenhouse gases as the unique climate objective after 2020, and allow the market to identify the most cost efficient way to deliver this target, thus preserving competitiveness of industry, protecting employment and consumer buying power, to drive economic growth," he wrote, adding in a hand-written note at the end, "This is a great opportunity for the EU to seize!"<aside> Fossil fuel industry must change profoundly, says former Shell boss BusinessGreen: Ex-Shell UK chairman James Smith argues there is a future for oil and gas firms in a warming world, but only if they embrace low carbon technology Read more

Shell is the sixth biggest lobbyist in Brussels, spending between €4.25-4.5m a year lobbying the EU institutions, according to the bloc's transparency register.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Apr 27th, 2015 at 12:57:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm SHOCKED, I tell you, SHOCKED
by Bernard (bernard) on Mon Apr 27th, 2015 at 03:54:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"Gas is good for Europe, and Europe is good at gas," the firm's upstream executive director, Malcolm Brinded wrote in a five-page letter to Barroso.
Policy reduced to sloganeering. Well done, Europe.

A society committed to the notion that government is always bad will have bad government. And it doesn't have to be that way. — Paul Krugman
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Apr 28th, 2015 at 04:24:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What has it to do with "europe" if a lobbyist lobbies? I don't see much here.
by IM on Tue Apr 28th, 2015 at 07:26:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That European institutions should be less permeable to big commercial lobbying interests, what else?
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Apr 28th, 2015 at 07:33:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
just european Institution? It is quite silly to assume there are no lobbyists at national capitals.
by IM on Tue Apr 28th, 2015 at 07:57:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In this extremely important case, the Commission was lobbied, particularly in the person of its president.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Apr 28th, 2015 at 08:37:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
My national capital is so thoroughly corrupt, they don't need lobbyists.

A society committed to the notion that government is always bad will have bad government. And it doesn't have to be that way. — Paul Krugman
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Apr 28th, 2015 at 08:51:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
We don' need no steenkin' lobbystas.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Apr 28th, 2015 at 09:16:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You mean Spanish politicians are so corrupt they won't stay bought?
by rifek on Wed Apr 29th, 2015 at 11:39:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series