The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Is that this? Could you elaborate? Point n'est besoin d'espérer pour entreprendre, ni de réussir pour persévérer. - Charles le Téméraire
So, the US suppress worker wages, which suppresses income-financed consumption. The US progressively eases restrictions on debt creation, directly in support of the transactions income from debt creation to the political donors on Wall Street. Indirectly, this leads to trade deficits, which help sustain trade surpluses in China. The trade surpluses in China combined with government policies pursuing high rates of investment require high rates of saving.
Flip around cause and effect, pretend that the high rates of saving in China are a cause rather than an effect in the triple balances, and now the trade deficit is "China's fault", and pursuing balanced trade now requires suppressing wages. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
the US suppress worker wages, which suppresses income-financed consumption... Indirectly, this leads to trade deficits
But what makes the difference between US domestic demand suppression and German, that leads to a trade surplus? I used to be afew. I'm still not many.
Germany is avoiding.. well, really, postponing. that problem taking a really insane percentage of the output of German workers, putting it in shipping containers and sending it abroad - not in trade for other goods, because imports are sinful, you know, but essentially to keep people working. just.. because.
The US mechanism of postponement has been to finance the consumption via debt. Instead of paying workers enough to fully mobilize the means of production, the labor force gets a credit line. This results in imports because a lot of said credit is foreign.
Since the FXR rigging is via building a (broken) monetary union instead of by active intervention, the objections to Asian neo-mercantilism are thereby ducked. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
(W)hat makes the difference between US domestic demand suppression and German, that leads to a trade surplus?
In an essay dealing with coverage of international economics entitled Michael Pettis: China's Economy, Internal And External Balance, Pettis compares his own approach In The Great Rebalancing to that of another author, Peter Timis' The Leaderless Economy:
Both books analyze the global economy in pretty much the same way, as an economic system in which any country's domestic economy is inextricably linked to other economies through the balance of payments mechanisms. The ability to place events within their global context is consequently crucially important in understanding any country's economic performance, but actually doing so tends more to be the exception than the rule.
The Leaderless Economy makes the same point I try to make in The Great Rebalancing: the economic analysis of any country is largely useless if it ignores, or treats as a minor issue, links with the external sector - i.e. other countries - and this is even more true today than in the past. Even something as important, and as seemingly "domestic", as the US savings rate (which for most people is assumed largely to reflect cultural preferences towards thrift among American households) is not determined primarily by American households but rather by its links with savings distortions abroad. This might seem a profoundly counterintuitive statement, but in fact you only need to understand two or three accounting identities to be able to work logically through the explanation. I showed why one country's savings rate is as likely to be determined by domestic distortions as it is by distortions abroad in a blog entry on whether a savings glut must cause global savings to rise. In another blog entry, I explained why a low savings rate in countries like Spain was a necessary outcome of policies in Germany that effectively restricted wage growth. And finally I showed how - because of the role of the dollar in reserve accumulation and, more generally, the unrestricted ability of foreigners to buy US assets - the US savings rate is determined largely as a residual needed to balance net capital flows, in a blog entry on the so-called exorbitant privilege...
I could not agree more. Between the two quoted sections is a very cogent example of just how important this relationship is. The effects of international trade on one country's economy could be seen as the combination of the three sector accounting identity for each country linked to the other countries through the import/export terms. (Another example is all of the history I read before becoming modestly economically literate.) :-) "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by gmoke - Aug 14 4 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 12 8 comments
by Oui - Aug 12 28 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 1 20 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 3 4 comments
by Oui - Jul 12 52 comments
by gmoke - Aug 1
by gmoke - Jul 31 3 comments
by Oui - Aug 176 comments
by Oui - Aug 166 comments
by Oui - Aug 151 comment
by gmoke - Aug 144 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 128 comments
by Oui - Aug 1228 comments
by Oui - Aug 944 comments
by Oui - Aug 716 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 34 comments
by Oui - Aug 31 comment
by Oui - Aug 211 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 120 comments
by gmoke - Jul 313 comments
by Oui - Jul 3016 comments
by Oui - Jul 30
by Oui - Jul 261 comment
by Oui - Jul 253 comments
by Oui - Jul 2310 comments
by Oui - Jul 1971 comments