The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Most people in this country, certainly most members of the political class and especially its expression in Washington, don't realize what Donald Trump is trying to do in Europe and Russia. Back in December I explained that Trump has a plan to break up the European Union. Trump and his key advisor Steve Bannon (former Breitbart chief) believe they can promise an advantageous trade agreement with the United Kingdom, thus strengthening the UK's position in its negotiations over exiting the EU. With such a deal in place with the UK, they believe they can slice apart the EU by offering the same model deal to individual EU states.
Trump and Bannon are extremely hostile to Merkel and eager to see her lose. But what is increasingly clear is that Trump will make the break up of the EU a central administration policy and appears to want the same for NATO. My own view is that Trump and Bannon greatly overestimate America's relative economic power in the world. Their view appears to be that no European country will feel it is able to be locked out of trade with a US-UK trade pact. An America eager to break up the EU seems more likely to inject new life into the union. However that may be, Trump and Bannon clearly want to create a nativist world order based on the US, Russia and states that want to align with them. The EU and NATO are only obstacles to that goal.
My own view is that Trump and Bannon greatly overestimate America's relative economic power in the world. Their view appears to be that no European country will feel it is able to be locked out of trade with a US-UK trade pact. An America eager to break up the EU seems more likely to inject new life into the union. However that may be, Trump and Bannon clearly want to create a nativist world order based on the US, Russia and states that want to align with them. The EU and NATO are only obstacles to that goal.
All foreign policy is disguised domestic policy, or at least it used to be. Is Trump really going to sacrifice his re-election in 2020 to boost Putin? I mean, maybe Trump doesn't care for 2020 that much, after all, it could be a case of "President? Bin there, done that?". But Trump is too much of a narcissist to give it up that readily.
But then again, Trump just talks shit all the time anyway, it's not like it's a real policy commitment keep to the Fen Causeway
If Ireland is big enough to be on their map, it would be an obvious target, given its close cultural links to the US, and dependency on US FDI. Farage has openly touted Irexit as next on the list, in a couple of years, when Ireland sees the success the UK is going to make out of Brexit. Perhaps a United Ireland can be offered as a sweetener...
And it' not as if there aren't voices in Ireland eager to take the bait, thinking we can play off the EU against the US. But this stuff is way above our league. We have an unprecedentedly weak minority government which could be blown away by the slightest storm and N. Ireland is already showing renewed signs of instability with the collapse of the devolved government in the province.
The big issue here is whether Merkel's Germany is strong enough to provide sufficient leadership to ensure the stability of the EU. Fighting Trump and Putin, even if for only 4 years, is not going to be easy, and fixing the Euro and the EU is not going to come cheap. But first she must deal with her own far right in the German elections and then see off the multiple threats posed by Brexit. Merkel is being forced to become a major world leader late in her career and possibly against her will. This could become an epic fail, or it could be a major triumph. The stakes are the survival of the EU. Index of Frank's Diaries
As Theresa May prepares to outline Britain's plan for exiting the EU, former MP and deputy leader of the Conservative Party Michael Portillo says he does not anticipate a restoration of a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic. He told Newstalk Breakfast he believes the border will be outside Northern Ireland. People and goods will continue to move freely between North and South and Great Britain will impose controls between Northern Ireland and Great Britain, he said. "It is essential that there will be no border of the old sort. We have to ensure that the benefits from the Good Friday Agreement and the new political reality survive."
He told Newstalk Breakfast he believes the border will be outside Northern Ireland. People and goods will continue to move freely between North and South and Great Britain will impose controls between Northern Ireland and Great Britain, he said.
"It is essential that there will be no border of the old sort. We have to ensure that the benefits from the Good Friday Agreement and the new political reality survive."
The CTA [Common Travel Area] was suspended on the outbreak of war in 1939, and travel restrictions were introduced between the islands of Great Britain and Ireland.[11] This meant that travel restrictions even applied to people travelling within the UK if they were travelling from Northern Ireland to elsewhere in the UK. 1952 agreement After the war, the Irish re-instated their previous provisions allowing free movement[12] but the British declined to do so pending the agreement of a "similar immigration policy"[13] in both countries. Consequently, the British maintained immigration controls between the islands of Ireland and Great Britain until 1952, to the consternation of Northern Ireland's Unionist population.[14]
After the war, the Irish re-instated their previous provisions allowing free movement[12] but the British declined to do so pending the agreement of a "similar immigration policy"[13] in both countries. Consequently, the British maintained immigration controls between the islands of Ireland and Great Britain until 1952, to the consternation of Northern Ireland's Unionist population.[14]
I'm not sure how customs controls would be applied in the same way as I'm sure the EU would want some involvement to ensure correct tariffs were applied and the UK might object to them operating on UK soil. (They could always staff the customs posts with extra-terrestrials...) Index of Frank's Diaries
internal passports for the UK shouldn't be introduced just to pander to the bigots in UKIP and the tabloid press Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
The border problem then comes down to difficult details: what happens to EU citizens who have been banned from the UK for immigration law breaches, for instance?
UK prime minister Theresa May has committed to maintaining the common travel area with the Republic. Speaking on Tuesday about the objectives of the Brexit programme, Ms May said the UK government would "make it a priority to deliver a practical solution" as quickly as possible to the question of the land border with the Irish State. "Nobody wants to return to the borders of the past," said the prime minister. "The family ties and bonds of affection that unite our two countries mean that there will always be a special relationship between us," she said, adding that maintaining the common travel area with Ireland would be "an important part of the talks".
"Nobody wants to return to the borders of the past," said the prime minister. "The family ties and bonds of affection that unite our two countries mean that there will always be a special relationship between us," she said, adding that maintaining the common travel area with Ireland would be "an important part of the talks".
The problem arises if Le Pen or ongoing Italian crises threaten the future of the Eurozone/EU - both institutions which have benefited Germany more than anyone. She could (somewhat uncharacteristically) take the initiative and campaign on the basis of a strong Germany/EU post Brexit with enhanced security cooperation, economic integration and social cohesion taking advantage of an improving economic situation and anti-Trump/Brexit sentiment especially if Macron wins or Le Pen doesn't.
I'm not close enough to German politics to assess the likely strategies and outcomes. Anyone up for a diary on the German elections? Index of Frank's Diaries
the Trump people view the EU as an irrelevancy a prey more than an opponent.
I'm not buying the "isolationist" shtick, not when Breitbart is setting shop in Germany and in France, not when Trump plans fast track trade deals to splinter European countries.
Predators don't attack "irrelevancies", the do attack preys.
She could even become a visionary leader and propose a new EU Treaty encompassing greater military/security cooperation, greater fiscal integration, and some social market reforms post Brexit provided Le Pen does not win the General election in France in May and particularly if former Minister for the Economy Emmanuel Macron wins.
If she loses or if the AfD do spectacularly well she is probably history. I'd love if someone here who is closer to French and German politics than I did a diary on how those elections are shaping up. How will Brexit and Trump influence the outcome? Will they energise the hard right or serve as a warning as to what can happen if the hard right wins? Index of Frank's Diaries
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2 3 comments
by gmoke - Sep 27
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 10 3 comments
by Oui - Oct 5
by Oui - Oct 4
by Oui - Oct 41 comment
by Oui - Oct 31 comment
by Oui - Oct 24 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 23 comments
by Oui - Oct 214 comments
by Oui - Oct 115 comments
by Oui - Oct 124 comments
by Oui - Sep 30
by Oui - Sep 303 comments
by Oui - Sep 2819 comments
by Oui - Sep 28
by Oui - Sep 276 comments
by Oui - Sep 271 comment
by Oui - Sep 263 comments
by Oui - Sep 266 comments
by Oui - Sep 251 comment
by Oui - Sep 252 comments