The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
... Although there can be no doubt that the assemblies held at Uruk during the time of Gilgamesh were less advanced than those held in later Greece or Rome, the situation that brought about the convening of Uruk's bicameral assemblies is not dissimilar to the one that ancient Greece faced some 2400 years later. Sumer, like Greece, was made up of a number of independent city-states, each of them vying for power and supremacy over the region and its people. In a reversal of the veto power that the assembly of the arms-bearing men had over the elders in Uruk, the Spartan* elders (a council of twenty-eight men, all over sixty years of age) had the power to overrule any `crooked decree' that was passed by the popular assembly. ...
(*)Note that the origin of "Spartans" in the Peloponnese is contested among professional classicsts. Some say they were not "Greek"-speakers but "Indo-Iranian" speaking colonizers from Eurasia, contemporaneously associated with "Sea People", Hurrian or Hittite cultures and conquests, 2nd millenium BCE. Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
But if Uruk was the first town, ie pre-dates Jericho, then we're talking 10,000 years. And there are towns in Turkey that are older than Jericho with sophisticated stone work. So, the events that inspired the Saga of Gilgamesh probably originates from the middle Ice age. Way before Nineveh. keep to the Fen Causeway
I take your point therefore in defense of volumes of historiography published by "professional" and amateur classicists that deviate in any respect from eurocentric, judeo-christian "interpretations" of The Evidence. Hell, that deadline 8,000 BCE (canon, first "civilization")? It is whimsical, strictly speaking as dating conventions on which all sorts of ancillary research relies have been upset by supposed hi-fi material analyses several times in the last 50 years.
So too are toponymic conventions :) among the ancients and the interpreters. Cunieform Ugaritic and Hurrian or Linears A and B, don't translate themselves, yo. Elsewhere, oral "tradition" is SOL on the *Matters-Meter.
I promoted this one article, for example, and a couple of pertinent lectures (previously) to illustrate the state of play in sociology of knowledge. Premium added to "greek" democracy is fading. Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
This led to a collapse of the existing "Heroic" Greek civilisations of the middle bronze age. Several of these kingdoms appeared to have died out, Sparta probably being one of them. The later Spartans were supposedly arrivals from the Balkans who took on the mantle of the original but who were apparently unrelated to them.
But whatever the theories, however much there is interesting linkage in the fossil record, we lack anything like real proof. keep to the Fen Causeway
Fossil forensic analysis is redundant; recent (m)DNA sequencing [1, 2] confirmed the obvious inadequacies of stereotyping by "nationality" or naming conventions, now or at any time in the past 10,000 years.
Historical linguists have paid a lot more attention to documents to decipher how, where, when, and why people adopt names for themselves and places in their possession. Corporate M&A ritual in the present day as it always has been -- especially in Greece considering legendary invasions of the inexhaustible "tribes".
"Minoan" material culture scarcely anymore conveys the meaning of originality given to it by european scholarship at peak imperial hegemony and idolatry of the "Heroic Age" of Greece. Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
Grain is special, but for a different reason. It is easy to standardize -- to plant in rows or paddies, and store and record in units such as bushels. This makes grain an ideal target for taxation. Unlike underground tubers or legumes, grain grows tall and needs harvesting all at once, so officials can easily estimate annual yields. And unlike fugitive wild foods, grain creates a relatively consistent surplus, allowing a ruling class to skim off peasant laborers' production through a tax regime of manageable complexity. Grain, in Scott's lexicon, is the kind of thing a state can see. On this account, the first cities were not so much a great leap forward for humanity as a new mode of exploitation that enabled the world's first leisured ruling class to live on the sweat of the world's first peasant-serfs. As for writing, that great gateway to history, Scott reports that its earliest uses suggest it was basically a grain-counting technology. Literary culture and shared memory existed in abundance both before and after the first pictographs and alphabets -- consider Homer's epics, the products of a nonliterate Greek "dark age" before the Classical period. Writing contributed a ledger of exploitation.
From the `Odyssey,' Book I, Homer, translated by Emily Wilson
< wipes tears > Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
'Virtue-signalling' -- the putdown that has passed its sell-by date
As the Boston Globe columnist Mark Peters has pointed out, "virtue-signalling" has existed in isolated pockets since at least 2004, but was popularised (not, as he claims, invented) by James Bartholomew in the Spectator in April 2015. If you've heard the phrase recently, it's most likely being used according to his definition [...] "Virtue-signalling" is also a neat, pithy phrase, with - and this is the killer, really - a social-sciencey air, as though it's a phenomenon recorded by behavioural economists and factored into nudge-unit projections of how many men pee standing up. (As of January 2016, however, a Google scholar search for the term yields only a handful of citations related to the work of a single religious studies academic.)
"Virtue-signalling" is also a neat, pithy phrase, with - and this is the killer, really - a social-sciencey air, as though it's a phenomenon recorded by behavioural economists and factored into nudge-unit projections of how many men pee standing up. (As of January 2016, however, a Google scholar search for the term yields only a handful of citations related to the work of a single religious studies academic.)
NEW SCRIPT! PLACES, EVERYONE Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
The real problem, of course, isn't the signaling part: Everyone is signaling all the time, whether it's about social justice or their commitment to Second Amendment rights or their concerns about immigration law. Those who accuse others of virtue signaling seem angry about the supposed virtues themselves -- angry that someone, anyone, appears to care about something they do not. Another Twitter user, defending Donald Trump after the infamous "Access Hollywood" tape, wrote: "Stop virtue signaling. It doesn't work. Are you saying you never talked dirty in a [private] conversation?" The logic here is not that Trump or his actions were morally correct, but that no one else is, either, and anyone who claims otherwise is lying. Those who cry "virtue signaling," though? At least, they claim, they're honest about it. They are, of course, trying to signal something about their own values: that they are pragmatic, appropriately cynical, in touch with the painful facts of everyday life. Virtue signaling can be a way of staking out a position in an argument -- not just the high ground, but the highest ground. (You may be against racism, but I am more against racism than you.) But calling out virtue signaling is a useful position in itself.
Those who cry "virtue signaling," though? At least, they claim, they're honest about it. They are, of course, trying to signal something about their own values: that they are pragmatic, appropriately cynical, in touch with the painful facts of everyday life. Virtue signaling can be a way of staking out a position in an argument -- not just the high ground, but the highest ground. (You may be against racism, but I am more against racism than you.) But calling out virtue signaling is a useful position in itself.
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 11 11 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 8 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 6 4 comments
by gmoke - Mar 7
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 2 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 5 2 comments
by gmoke - Feb 25
by Oui - Mar 261 comment
by Oui - Mar 259 comments
by Oui - Mar 244 comments
by Oui - Mar 246 comments
by Oui - Mar 23
by Oui - Mar 231 comment
by Oui - Mar 211 comment
by Oui - Mar 191 comment
by Oui - Mar 19
by Oui - Mar 18
by Oui - Mar 175 comments
by Oui - Mar 16
by Oui - Mar 165 comments
by Oui - Mar 1510 comments
by Oui - Mar 155 comments
by Oui - Mar 147 comments
by Oui - Mar 1312 comments
by Oui - Mar 12
by Oui - Mar 1113 comments