The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The future of Britain is going to be shaped to a far greater extent by Saturday's EU-27 Council meeting than it will be by the June general election. That is one of the many ironies of the Brexiter mantra of `taking back control', because whilst the chain of coming events was begun not by the EU but by the British referendum, the shape of those events will be very much down to the EU. So insular has the discussion in the UK been before and since the referendum that one might think that Brexit is simply a matter of the UK formulating its demands. The EU will then fall into line because `it's in their interests' or `it's in Germany's interests' or even because `it's in German's car industry's interests'; and anyway because `we're the world's fifth largest economy'. There are many versions of this wishful thinking, all of them completely devoid of any understanding whatsoever of how the EU - or the world in general - operates. If it was how they think, then Britain would never have left the EU, since doing so is so far at odds with both our national and business interests. It's true that in the immediate aftermath of the referendum Britain might have been able to pursue a soft Brexit of single market membership. That would have taken considerable diplomatic and political skill, but it might have been achievable. Instead, everything the government has done since then has had the effect of making goodwill and room for manoeuvre disappear. And not just the government. EU leaders (and their electorates) see and have disdain for the infantile headlines of the Brexit press, and they don't simply laugh off Farage's oafish rudeness, on the odd occasions he turns up at the European Parliament, or Johnson's boorish buffoonery about `prison guards' and `Prosecco exports'. So whilst Britain has been engaging in an orgy of stupidity and insularity, the EU has, almost since the day after the referendum, been quietly and consistently developing its stance, as explained in this excellent three-part summary of the EU's position by David Allen Green of the FT. It is a stance that has changed very little from what was indicated before the referendum, and every leave voter who cared to could have known in broad terms what it would be. None of them can say there was no warning.
So insular has the discussion in the UK been before and since the referendum that one might think that Brexit is simply a matter of the UK formulating its demands. The EU will then fall into line because `it's in their interests' or `it's in Germany's interests' or even because `it's in German's car industry's interests'; and anyway because `we're the world's fifth largest economy'. There are many versions of this wishful thinking, all of them completely devoid of any understanding whatsoever of how the EU - or the world in general - operates. If it was how they think, then Britain would never have left the EU, since doing so is so far at odds with both our national and business interests.
It's true that in the immediate aftermath of the referendum Britain might have been able to pursue a soft Brexit of single market membership. That would have taken considerable diplomatic and political skill, but it might have been achievable. Instead, everything the government has done since then has had the effect of making goodwill and room for manoeuvre disappear. And not just the government. EU leaders (and their electorates) see and have disdain for the infantile headlines of the Brexit press, and they don't simply laugh off Farage's oafish rudeness, on the odd occasions he turns up at the European Parliament, or Johnson's boorish buffoonery about `prison guards' and `Prosecco exports'.
So whilst Britain has been engaging in an orgy of stupidity and insularity, the EU has, almost since the day after the referendum, been quietly and consistently developing its stance, as explained in this excellent three-part summary of the EU's position by David Allen Green of the FT. It is a stance that has changed very little from what was indicated before the referendum, and every leave voter who cared to could have known in broad terms what it would be. None of them can say there was no warning.
h/t ceebs keep to the Fen Causeway
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 3 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 2 2 comments
by gmoke - Nov 28
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 21 10 comments
by gmoke - Nov 12 6 comments
by Oui - Dec 96 comments
by Oui - Dec 88 comments
by Oui - Dec 717 comments
by Oui - Dec 54 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 32 comments
by Oui - Dec 214 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 22 comments
by Oui - Dec 26 comments
by Oui - Dec 112 comments
by Oui - Dec 14 comments
by Oui - Nov 306 comments
by Oui - Nov 289 comments
by Oui - Nov 276 comments
by gmoke - Nov 26
by Oui - Nov 268 comments
by Oui - Nov 26
by Oui - Nov 2513 comments
by Oui - Nov 2318 comments
by Oui - Nov 22