Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Indeed! And just because, historically, almost all benefits of European or US FDI have flowed to the investor with a small bit flowing to local elites that we call 'corrupt' and they think of as 'traditional' does not mean that more broadly shared benefits are not possible. Especially were the foreign investors make that a requirement. We should not assume that this is categorically impossible.

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Thu Aug 10th, 2017 at 03:36:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
hmm, yes, well, given outcomes of prior trials, what are the odds that a privately-owned commercial business will require distribution of specific benefits of public utility for "North Africa" in order to begin construction of DESERTEC?

Have you a recent example?

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Thu Aug 10th, 2017 at 05:07:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Not for North Africa, Oakland under Jerry Brown did impose some 'affordable housing' requirements on developers. Point being that it is possible, not that it is likely. And we are full speed ahead in the opposite direction presently in the USA with Public Money in Private Pockets Partnerships.

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sat Aug 12th, 2017 at 02:17:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series