The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
As of the withdrawal date, the United Kingdom will no longer be part of the customs and tax (VAT and excise) territory of the Union. Consequently movements of goods between the UK and the EU 27 will constitute third country trade. The principles outlined in this paper aim to ensure an orderly withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union in respect of customs related matters. [...] It is for the declarant to demonstrate the status of the goods (Union or non-Union) before the date of withdrawal and the fact that the relevant movement or entry into a customs regime was initiated before the date of withdrawal. The following general rules seek to implement that approach and should apply in accordance with Union Law, as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union on the date of entry into force of the Withdrawal Agreement: ...
No wonder UK gov't hastens to enact the "Repeal" bill (12,000 EU-compliant provisions?) with the Poison Pill (Henry VII).
Retention of existing EU law 2 Saving for EU-derived domestic legislation 3 Incorporation of direct EU legislation 4 Saving for Signaturerights etc. under section 2(1) of the ECA 5 Exceptions to savings and incorporation 6 Interpretation of retained EU law
EU's workgroup will need all of 2018 and an army to comb out the nits in it. Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
The government's White Paper says there is "no single figure" for this, but that there are believed to be 12,000 EU regulations (one type of EU law) in force, while Parliament has passed 7,900 statutory instruments implementing EU legislation and 186 acts which incorporate a degree of EU influence.
errata: 7,900 statutes + 186 statutes. My bad.
So.
How eager would the EP, EC, and Council need to be in order to accommodate an orderly UK "transition"? Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
Didn't he open up trade with France? This seems a strange choice. Maybe you meant Henry VIII? (they might have considered using Anne Boleyn laws as well, if Diana had not been in the habit of not wearing a seatbelt).
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 14 78 comments
by Oui - Nov 13 20 comments
by ARGeezer - Nov 7 73 comments
by Oui - Nov 7 5 comments
by Oui - Nov 7 11 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 2 71 comments
by fjallstrom - Oct 31 5 comments
by gmoke - Oct 30 2 comments
by Oui - Nov 152 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 1478 comments
by Oui - Nov 1320 comments
by Oui - Nov 132 comments
by Oui - Nov 9
by Oui - Nov 75 comments
by Oui - Nov 711 comments
by ARGeezer - Nov 773 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 271 comments
by Oui - Nov 14 comments
by Oui - Oct 31
by fjallstrom - Oct 315 comments
by gmoke - Oct 302 comments
by Oui - Oct 29
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2521 comments
by Oui - Oct 243 comments
by Oui - Oct 205 comments
by Oui - Oct 192 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 1747 comments
by Oui - Oct 171 comment