Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Sorry I've not been in theis diary. There have just been too many rumours and counter rumours.

There was a point early last week where Hammond (Chacellor of the exchequer) and McDonnel (Labour Shadow chancellor) seemed to be very publicly planning an end run around their respective leaders to pull an agreed rabbit out of the hat.

However, all went quiet on that front. The completely crap Budget speech may have had a lot to do with it, where McDonnel and Corbyn reluctantly voting for it for tactical reasons but have made plain their contempt.

However, interestingly, the 20 right wing Labour rebels defied their party line and voted against it. These are the very 20 votes May could be looking at to push through her bexit deal. Especially as Blair has come out and said that any deal will be awful for the country, but nothing will be as bad as a no deal.

tbh the various factions of Labour seem to be having an "opposite day" moment. Worrying about their viewpoints at this time is, sadly, becoming irrelevant.

Now Robert Peston (the journalist who first realised that the 2008 crash was actually happening) has an interesting view on the timeline, basically it's this month

Robert Peston FB

So at last, we really really really are entering the crunch phase of Brexit talks. You have heard this before but this time it is true.

Because the British government - not Brussels, not the EU 27 leaders - has decided that unless there is a deal this month, the default option of a no-deal Brexit becomes the probable outcome.

"We don't want no-deal. But because of the parliamentary timetable it becomes very hard to avoid if talks continue past this month" said a senior member of the government. "And that is why negotiation have massively shifted up a gear, with officials working through the night".

The important dates are tomorrow, when the prime minister briefs her cabinet on the likely shape of a deal, and (probably) next Monday - which is the probable cut-off day for organising an emergency Brexit council of EU leaders.

Or to put it another way, a week from today is when a comprehensive framework for withdrawal from the EU and the future relationship will need to have been settled, or preparations for a no-deal Brexit will have to be massively stepped up.

What are the obstacles?

The daunting one is the same as ever it was - how to keep open the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic.

Now the EU felt (rightly) it moved very significantly towards accommodating May's sensibilities last week, by belatedly agreeing in principle that the insurance policy or backstop to avoid any border checks on the island of Ireland could include the whole UK staying in a customs union with the EU and not just Northern Ireland - so as to prevent the creation of a UK-fracturing hard border between Great Britain and NI.

But it is not enough for May and her cabinet. And on its own, without associated constraints on the UK's freedom to manage its economy, there remain problems and concerns for the EU 27, especially France.

For example, a backstop that was only about avoiding tariffs being levied at Dover and Calais would still introduce friction at those ports - thus damaging British industries dependent on frictionless trade.

So May would prefer a backstop that also allowed for continued regulatory alignment between the UK and EU - such that British-based businesses with global supply chains did not risk falling off a cliff when the so-called Brexit implementation period, or our temporary status as a non-voting EU member, ends on 31 December 2020.

But to many Brexiters that would look like the UK as the EU's vassal or enslaved state - since such a backstop would see the UK following EU rules for business, the environment and competition and having no right to agree free-trade deals with other countries.

And for many in the EU it would look like the UK having and eating that notorious cake.

So both sides, the UK and the EU, have an interest in making it crystal clear that the backstop cannot be forever.


Neither side wants the other side to have the unilateral right to end the backstop period - for the normal if depressing reasons of national and supranational pride.

There will have to be a dual control mechanism for deciding when the backstop is no longer needed.

Here is what will electrify UK politics and outrage many Brexiters.

The dual control mechanism will be seen by Brexiters as the EU27 having a right to veto any decision by the UK to terminate the backstop.

And they would be right. The EU will not agree any Brexit deal that does not give the EU27 the ability to overrule any request by the UK to exit from backstop arrangements.

So there will only be a Brexit deal if enough Brexiters can be persuaded to trust that the EU has no interest in keeping the UK in backstop arrangements forever - but reserves the right for legitimate reasons to assess whether the border in Ireland could be kept open by means other than the backstop.

In the short term, the risk for May of Brexiters cutting up rough is that a few members of the Cabinet may prefer to resign than endorse what they would see as backstop (the UK as vassal state) in perpetuity - and most ministerial eyes are on the Brexiter Brexit secretary Dominic Raab, because he has been publicly posturing that the UK must have a unilateral right to terminate the backstop.

"What none of us know is whether that is theatre for the benefit of [the Brexiter] ERG, so he can say to them that he did his best to rein in the PM" said one of his colleagues. "Or whether he is really on the point of quitting".

Another said: "The PM can probably get the Brexit deal she wants through the Cabinet but possibly not without saying goodbye to some colleagues. As I said, for a variety of reasons this is a big week".

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Mon Nov 5th, 2018 at 08:30:00 PM EST
our temporary status as a non-voting EU member, ends on 31 December 2020

This opportunity --along with binding third-country trade restrictions--is entirely contingent in the first place on the UK signing a withdrawal agreement --with the consent of the EP and the EU Council on or before 29 March 2019. 29 March 2019 is the UK "cliff" per A50.

he has been publicly posturing that the UK must have a unilateral right to terminate the backstop.

More of the same. They run down the clock with trash talk rather than face up to their constituencies what a craven, vindictive lot of politicians they are. That is prepare the nation for the consequence of their actions. I suppose, Robert Preston will not be last struggling to make sense of it. But he ought to stop "enabling" them.

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Mon Nov 5th, 2018 at 10:51:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Every time I read the latest ruse by Brexiteers to screw Ireland or whoever I have this monumental urge to wish the very worst possible no-deal Brexit on them - if only cut through all the Brexiteer crap for once and for all.

And then I remember that it is ordinary people in the UK and Ireland who will suffer the most from such an outcome and try to become all responsible and think through a scenario where a little common sense can win through.

It is very easy to wreck stuff and very difficult to rebuild any of it afterwards after everyone has been inflamed and a lot of people have been hurt.

This has the potential to go very wrong indeed, to the point it could take a generation to fix, and yet most people seem to be happy to let the Brexiteers have their fun and games. Some of these guys make Trump look responsible.

Index of Frank's Diaries

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Tue Nov 6th, 2018 at 01:04:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I still remember that the DUP's avowed aim is to wreck the GFA. All they have to do is be extra intransigent, knowing that the Tory party will cave to each and every one of their demands, and they presume they will get their happiest dream.

However, this is no longer 1975 and things have changed somewhat; the Republic is now the strong economy and Ulster is the poor relation. Equally, post-brexit, Westminster will no longer be willing to bankroll the apartheid regime the DUP think they can re-introduce and so Ulster faces a hard choice in the medium term. Either allow for sustained and continuing population loss as the young drift across the border in search of work or face the inevitable that the DUP, being an old people's party with nothing to offer Ulster in the 21st century are literally dying off and the time has come for the 6 counties to come home.

Either way, the DUP's short term tactics have destroyed their hopes to achieve their objective

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Nov 6th, 2018 at 08:32:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What were the tactical reasons to vote for the budget?
by fjallstrom on Tue Nov 6th, 2018 at 09:07:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
apparently there were some useful tax cuts for the lower paid, but I've heard several contradictory statements by various people and, frankly, I no longer care to work out what is or what is not true concerning statements by the Parliamentary labour party.

It's all kabuki

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Nov 6th, 2018 at 12:16:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]