The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Compromise is however what we in the western world have got used to, and it is much more efficient than tanks. While the age of compriomise (third way) has certainly ended the the US, and in the rest of Europe may only succeed as a (deeply undemocratic) united front against AfD in Germany and FN in France, it may be still be doable in the UK. Combined with financial pressures it would lead to Corbyn having a crippled second term, and - this is would be the real victory - no change in UK's political discussion.
The only way he can do that is if Tory Remainers develop a backbone and vote no-confidence in May's government and that they have been unwilling to do until now. So all the outrage that is being hurled at Corbyn really needs to be re-directed at Tory Remainers who talk a good game but who are ultimately not prepared to vote against their party even as it drives the UK over a cliff.
In the meantime the best Corbyn can do is try to keep both Leavers and Remainers in his party united around the common goal of defeating the Tories in a general election. Then he can campaign on the basis of giving the people a vote on whatever deal he can agree with the EU - which will probably end up being very similar to the current deal, but with different priorities for the future relationship.
Then, if the people vote for his deal or remain, he can accept their verdict and govern on the basis of the new dispensation. Whether he is an extreme left winger or not really is beside the point: The point is he is a democrat, and at this point he doesn't have a mandate either to govern or to oppose the referendum result. Without at least a second referendum with a more decisive result, there will never be any change in the dominant anti-EU narrative in UK politics.
Index of Frank's Diaries
This is incorrect. There is plenty of compromise in the American system, even with our current screwed up administration. An example is the pending government shutdown, which is related to a specific and narrow point of argument, and affects the 25% of government that is related to that point. The other 75% of the government spending bills have already been debated and passed, using the traditional system of compromise and bartering, and will not be affected by a shutdown.
The press focusses on the "man bites dog" stories for obvious reasons, but it is important to look carefully at the overall situation.
by IdiotSavant - Jan 15 38 comments
by fjallstrom - Jan 16 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 12 80 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 7 36 comments
by Oui - Jan 7 101 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 26 43 comments
by Oui - Dec 28 21 comments
by Oui - Dec 25 1 comment
by fjallstrom - Jan 162 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jan 1538 comments
by Oui - Jan 153 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 1280 comments
by Oui - Jan 9
by Oui - Jan 81 comment
by Oui - Jan 84 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 736 comments
by Oui - Jan 7101 comments
by Oui - Jan 56 comments
by Oui - Jan 3
by Oui - Jan 36 comments
by Oui - Jan 21 comment
by Oui - Dec 313 comments
by Oui - Dec 2821 comments
by Oui - Dec 278 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 2643 comments
by Oui - Dec 2617 comments
by Oui - Dec 25