The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Britain would be hit with shortages of medicine, fuel and food within a fortnight if the UK tries to leave the European Union without a deal, according to a Doomsday Brexit scenario drawn up by senior civil servants for David Davis. Whitehall has begun contingency planning for the port of Dover to collapse "on day one" if Britain crashes out of the EU, leading to critical shortages of supplies. Last month officials in Davis's Brexit department and the departments of health and transport drew up scenarios for a no-deal Brexit -- a mild one, a severe one and one dubbed "Armageddon". A source said: "In the second scenario, not even the worst, the port of Dover will collapse on day one. The supermarkets in Cornwall and Scotland will run out of food within a couple of days, and hospitals will run out of medicines within two weeks." Officials would have to charter aircraft, or use the RAF to ferry supplies to the furthest corners of the UK. "You would have to medevac medicine into Britain, and at the end of week two we would be running out of petrol as well," the source said. Concern about chaos at Dover was behind a decision by Highways England to announce plans last month to build "one or more lorry holding areas" in Kent "to reduce the congestion caused by cross-Channel disruption". It is understood that the papers were prepared for the so-called Inter-Ministerial Group on Preparedness, which meets weekly when parliament is sitting. One official said the scenarios are so explosive they have only been shared with a handful of ministers and are "locked in a safe".
Whitehall has begun contingency planning for the port of Dover to collapse "on day one" if Britain crashes out of the EU, leading to critical shortages of supplies.
Last month officials in Davis's Brexit department and the departments of health and transport drew up scenarios for a no-deal Brexit -- a mild one, a severe one and one dubbed "Armageddon".
A source said: "In the second scenario, not even the worst, the port of Dover will collapse on day one. The supermarkets in Cornwall and Scotland will run out of food within a couple of days, and hospitals will run out of medicines within two weeks."
Officials would have to charter aircraft, or use the RAF to ferry supplies to the furthest corners of the UK. "You would have to medevac medicine into Britain, and at the end of week two we would be running out of petrol as well," the source said.
Concern about chaos at Dover was behind a decision by Highways England to announce plans last month to build "one or more lorry holding areas" in Kent "to reduce the congestion caused by cross-Channel disruption".
It is understood that the papers were prepared for the so-called Inter-Ministerial Group on Preparedness, which meets weekly when parliament is sitting. One official said the scenarios are so explosive they have only been shared with a handful of ministers and are "locked in a safe".
The Guardian adds:
The government has suggested it would temporarily waive tariffs and border checks on goods entering Britain in the event of a no-deal scenario, in an effort to minimise disruption at borders. But the EU could still halt the flow of goods in the opposite direction.
The UK strategy seems to be to keep the posts customs controls/tariff free in the hope that the EU would reciprocate. However this is because they simply don't have the infrastructure in place to impose those controls in the first place, and hope that that way they will have access to the Single market by default as if they were still a member.
However those nasty French will probably not reciprocate, partly because they may have more of the required infrastructure in place, the tariffs will come in handy to replace the lost UK contribution to the EU budget, and mainly because there are few UK exports that are absolutely critical to French/EU food/production supply chains.
The Brits will scream blue murder and that the actions of the French amount to a declaration of war. The EU will reply that they are simply treating UK goods and passengers in the same way as any other non-member state goods/citizens.
Unlike the UK where everything seems chaotic, I would be surprised if EU plans for a no-deal Brexit are not well advanced. And it is much easier for the EU to be prepared: UK exports make up only 4% of EU imports whereas EU sourced goods make up 40% of UK imports. So the impact on EU customs infrastructure is relatively marginal - an order of magnitude less than the impact on UK infrastructure - although highly concentrated in the channel ports area.
In the meantime, a new Cork to Santander ferry route has just been opened and Irish shipping firms plan to bypass British ports with direct routes to Europe.
CLdN, a shipping company in Luxembourg, has introduced two "mega vessels" on new direct freight routes between Dublin and the ports of Zeebrugge, Belgium, and Rotterdam, in the Netherlands. Irish Continental Group will boost weekly freight capacity from 120 to 1,155 lorries between Dublin and the French port of Cherbourg this summer. Brittany ferries will this month start a service between Cork and Santander in Spain
Irish Continental Group will boost weekly freight capacity from 120 to 1,155 lorries between Dublin and the French port of Cherbourg this summer.
Brittany ferries will this month start a service between Cork and Santander in Spain
The reaction from the tories more or less confirmed the truth of it and, with less than a year to go, even close friends of the Tories are wondering what on earth is going on.
A Times opinion column this morning called on May to go. However, after he outlined all the problems that she faced trying to simultaneously square several circles whilst deflating various brexiteer trial balloons, all the while avoiding upsetting influential voices who might derail the entire project, it was quite obvious that these cats ain't gonna be herded anytime soon.
Brexit is disintegrating in front of us, destroyed by the incompetence of its most enthusiastic supporters. I'm currently wondering whether at some point May will be making a version of the Japanese Emperor's Jewel Voice broadcast at the end of WWII the brexit situation has developed not necessarily to Britain's the Tory party's advantage" keep to the Fen Causeway
At the moment the June EU summit seems doomed to failure, and with it May's reputation for keeping the process going. It seems likely that she will lose a critical Commons vote sometime soon, but that may only usher in another Tory leader, not a general election.
Whatever chance May has of evoking a sympathetic response from EU leaders, Johnson, Gove, or Rees-Mogg have none. The will have no choice but to go for a no-deal "clean" break from the EU, with all the consequences described in the Times article.
Then after about two years of absolute mayhem I would expect a general election and a new government led by Corbyn. But he will receive no better welcome from the EU, particularly it's far right eastern leaders.
This has the potential of going complete out of control and downhill all the way, with the additional complications of the Italian crisis and the Trump Trade War thrown in for good measure.
How to destroy a relatively benign global economic outlook in three easy lessons. I still can't see a bottom to all of this... Index of Frank's Diaries
Re-group is around the proverbial corner. Y'all just got to keep your shit together for two more years. Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
Many are venal and stupid, but they are not that venal and stupid.
The final 18 months of "Trump" trade will concentrate the two brain cells between them to vote up --by ballot or bullet-- anyone but. Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
>who ARE the republicans and Democrats (or Independents)... The uniparty is already floating favored POTUS candidates. Why don't you know them? For example, Sen. Flake, one of the least distinguished in the wave of incumbents retreating from RNC #NeverTrump'16 to temporary obscurity, while Democrats besmirch the mid-term congressional recycle derby. What is Mr Flake's hook in I, D, R voters, Frank?
Independent a/k/a unaffiliated registered voters is NOT a partisan organization or incorporated enterprise. As such independent voters as a group do not raise capital or nominate candidates and are not regulated as such by the FEC and states' election boards. But individual independent voters are subject to FEC regulation limiting "donor" gifts to any party campaign. Further, independent voters are permitted only to vote for partisan candidates in open primary and general elections. Independent voters don't "put up" candidates. They make or break them. Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
Let's recap. I said he would not be elected again. Any one but:
I suggested that regardless of binary statistical descriptions of voter preferences, the true "margin of error" --independent voters-- will be the instrument of Trump's defeat. They will join with Trump opposition constituents in both parties to form a majority "for love of money."
Independent is a party of one. Squabbling over profits lost, jobs saved or created.
Now, you've pointed out --to the size of the minority faction with no indication of irony-- that splitting 56% of the remaining electorate (hidebound, middle-class, "Reagan" republican voters) lost the incumbent (G.H.W. Bush) the seat.
Case closed. Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
Look what happened to Flake. Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
We don't even know who the Dem candidate will be. I'm just using the graph to illustrated there is very little evidence that Trumps appalling record to date is causing any meaningful erosion of his base at the present time.
What happens in two years time is another matter, and depends on how the US economy fares after a trade war and whatever other wars Trump starts. BTW did the EU just target only Republican owned businesses? Index of Frank's Diaries
Per betting markets, Democrats' chances of winning the House have decreased from ~66% to ~58% over the past few months. It's a change worth noticing if you're an electoral junkie I guess? But either way the uncertainty remains super high. Polling isn't too precise in House races.— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) June 4, 2018
Per betting markets, Democrats' chances of winning the House have decreased from ~66% to ~58% over the past few months. It's a change worth noticing if you're an electoral junkie I guess? But either way the uncertainty remains super high. Polling isn't too precise in House races.
"It is the economy, stupid." Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
However, looking 'behind' the graph are some known GOP propaganda outfits such as Rasmussen whose "results" (sic) are keeping Trump's numbers high. When Gallup has a 12 to 15 point gap in approval and Rasmussen reports a 1 point gap something isn't kosher.
I think Trump and the GOP are in deep trouble.
IF people get off their asses and vote ... always a 'sometime thing' in midyear elections. She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre
Was it mathematically rigorous? Well, no, but if it was I would have failed. The formulas simply make no sense in and of themselves, and the class was happy to treat them as mysterious black boxes. I would not trust myself to use them in real research situations, then or now. However, it helped sharpen up my general thinking a little bit, and I remain far more aware of research design issues and the various potential flaws of data than most of my humanities-oriented peers. It's an incredibly low bar, but still.
And that's what set the House members off, because none of them believes there will be any more than one roll-call vote for the nominee. In their view, that means elected Democratic officials -- who have been put into office by hundreds of thousands or even millions of constituents -- won't play a role in nominating their party's presidential candidate.
In their view, that means elected Democratic officials -- who have been put into office by hundreds of thousands or even millions of constituents -- won't play a role in nominating their party's presidential candidate.
"I believe this decision, if they go forward, is going to do terrible damage to party harmony," said Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), who raised his objections with Perez during Tuesday's dinner. "It disenfranchises the elected leadership of the party. The last time we allowed that to happen was 1972, and we had the worst landslide in our history."
:: Hello! The Modern History of the Democratic Presidential Primary, 1972-2008 "Most political observers consider 1972 the beginning of the "modern era" of presidential politics. After the controversial 1968 presidential cycle..." The Modern History of the Republican Presidential Primary, 1976-2012 "While the Republican Party also went on to adopt [']many reforms['] as well, it importantly has never adopted proportionality as a universal rule, largely leaving delegate allocation methods to the state parties." Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
I did not see this coming.
20/20 hindsight: 13 April 2018 besides 54 bills (both chambers, both parties).
All things equal, I have to change my call from SELL to HOLD. The "trade war" will have to tank the economy hard and fast for to take the edge off Trump signing any of them. Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by gmoke - Nov 28
by gmoke - Nov 12 7 comments
by Oui - Dec 1
by gmoke - Nov 301 comment
by Oui - Nov 3010 comments
by Oui - Nov 2837 comments
by Oui - Nov 278 comments
by Oui - Nov 2511 comments
by Oui - Nov 24
by Oui - Nov 221 comment
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 2119 comments
by Oui - Nov 1615 comments
by Oui - Nov 154 comments
by Oui - Nov 1319 comments
by Oui - Nov 1224 comments
by gmoke - Nov 127 comments
by Oui - Nov 1114 comments
by Oui - Nov 10
by Oui - Nov 928 comments
by Oui - Nov 8