The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Majoritarianism is believed to be a desirable ideological objective of "modern" and liberal sovereign governance.
Advocates of majoritarianism argue that majority decision making is intrinsically democratic and that any restriction on majority decision making is intrinsically undemocratic. If democracy is restricted by a constitution which cannot be changed by a simple majority decision then yesterday's majority is being given more weight than today's. If it is restricted by some small group, such as aristocrats, judges, priests, soldiers, or philosophers, then society becomes an oligarchy. The only restriction acceptable in a majoritarian system is that a current majority has no right to prevent a different majority emerging in the future (this could happen, for example, if a minority persuades enough of the majority to change its position). In particular, a majority cannot exclude a minority from future participation in the democratic process. Majoritarianism does not prohibit a decision being made by representatives as long as this decision is made via majority rule, as it can be altered at any time by any different majority emerging in the future.
A common framework for interpreting populism is known as the ideational approach: this defines populism as an ideology which posits "the people" as a morally good force against "the elite", who are perceived as corrupt. Populists differ in how "the people" are defined, but it can be based along class, ethnic, or national lines. Populists typically present "the elite" as comprising the political, economic, cultural, and media establishment, all of which are depicted as a homogenous entity and accused of placing the interests of other groups--such as foreign countries or immigrants--above the interests of "the people". According to this approach, populism is a thin-ideology which is combined with other, more substantial thick ideologies such as nationalism, liberalism, or socialism. Thus, populists can be found at different locations along the left-right political spectrum and there is both left-wing populism and right-wing populism.
From where therefore does a distinction between the terms "populist" and "democratic" derive persuasive currency except in definition of citizenship, the eligible voter? In either case majority rule --measured by plenary ballot of individuals to elect public officers-- is antithetical to minority, or "elite," rule.
Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 10 41 comments
by IdiotSavant - Nov 8 13 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 6 33 comments
by Oui - Nov 8 1 comment
by Oui - Nov 4 13 comments
by IdiotSavant - Oct 15 6 comments
by gmoke - Nov 8
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 31 54 comments
by Oui - Nov 122 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 1041 comments
by Oui - Nov 81 comment
by IdiotSavant - Nov 813 comments
by gmoke - Nov 8
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 633 comments
by Oui - Nov 413 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 3154 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 3031 comments
by Oui - Oct 2915 comments
by Oui - Oct 2713 comments
by Cat - Oct 2512 comments
by Oui - Oct 252 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 2532 comments
by IdiotSavant - Oct 2520 comments
by Oui - Oct 24136 comments
by Oui - Oct 235 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2235 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2089 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 1734 comments