Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Are Critics of Economics Inconsistent? - Unlearning Economics - Medium
Bounded rationality is a paradigmatic example. Early criticisms of rationality from people like Herbert Simon were broad ranging criticisms of the idea that people could even begin to behave in the way depicted by the standard utility-maximising model given that they had neither the information, the capacity to process that information, nor the ability to act upon it that would be required. Thus they would use rules of thumb, `satisfice' instead of `optimise', and and so forth.

Are Critics of Economics Inconsistent? - Unlearning Economics - Medium
`Imperfect information' in mainstream economics is another example: in a sense individuals have more information than under perfect information, since they know all the probabilities and possible states of the world instead of just one of the latter. And as I have previously argued, this point applies even to the name of macroeconomic models -- which claim to be Dynamic, Stochastic, General and Equilibrium, but are not really the first 3 in any meaningful sense. Critics would like to see their issue at the core of theories instead of bolted on at the end.
by generic on Tue Sep 4th, 2018 at 12:48:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
So many memorable quotes from which to choose, so little time to read the book The Sciences of the Artificial. Where to begin ... symbol systems? intelligence as computation? ... judgment? ... abstract rationality? ... utility functions? ah! Chapter Two, "Operations Research and Management Science"
Today several branches of applied science assist the firm to achieve procedural rationality. 3 One of them is operations research (OR); another is artificial intelligence (AI). OR provides alogrithms [RULES] for handling difficult multivariate decision problems, sometimes  involving uncertainty. Linear programming, integer programming, queuing theory [eg FIFO], and linear decisions rules are examples of widely used OR procedures.

To permit computers to find optimal solutions with reasonable expenditures of effort when there are hundreds or thousands of variables, the powerful [RULES] associated with OR imposes a strong mathematical structure on the decision problem. Their power is bought at the cost [EXPENDITURE] of shaping and squeezing the real-world problem to fit their computational requirements: for example, replacing the real-world criterion function and constratins with linear approximations so that linear programming can be used. Of course the decision that is optimal for the simplified approximation will rarely be optimal in the real world, but experience shows that it will often be satisfactory.

The alternative methods provided by AI, most often in the form of heuristic search (selective search using rules of thumb) [BIAS, PREJUDICE], find decisions that are "good enough," that satisfice. The AI models, like OR models, also only approximate the real world, but usually with much more accuracy and detail than the OR models can admit. They can do this because heuristic search can be carried out in more complex and less well structured problem space than is required by OR maximizing tools. The price paid [EXPENDITURE] for working with the more realistic but less regular models is that the methods generally find only satisfactory solutions, not optima. We must trade off satisficing in a nearly-realistic model (AI) against optimizing in a greatly simplified model (OR). Sometimes one will be preferred, sometimes the other.

NEXT WEEK: truth-seeking with Oliver Williams in The Economic Institutions of Capitalism

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Tue Sep 4th, 2018 at 03:13:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Top Diaries

Occasional Series