The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Amended UK-EU withdrawal agreement? No. 24 Jan 2019: Barnier says time-limited Irish backstop not possible
Amended Uk-IE GFA after 29 March? Possible, low-probability. Besides this would require a referendum in both countries, no? Amended UK-IE GFA on or before 29 March? No.
Why? The answer to all these questions is, no one trusts Tory gov or HOC, not even the dread Arlene the Paisley. Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
A bit of "Internet research" suggests that the current trade volumes in each direction across the border are about equal. But the question is, what will they be after Brexit?
I would expect, post Brexit for North south smuggling to increase significantly if there is a depreciation of Sterling and the imposition of tariffs on some products. Overall, however, the volumes are small in an EU context. It is the legal precedents and implications for general tax compliance which are likely to be most problematic. Index of Frank's Diaries
Ireland dismisses suggestion it should quit EU and join UK
Ireland has dismissed the suggestion that the best solution to the Brexit impasse might be for the country to quit the EU and join the UK. Questioned about the possibility by the BBC Today presenter John Humphrys, Ireland's Europe minister, Helen McEntee, said it was not contemplating quitting the EU, that polls showed 92% of the population wanted to remain in the bloc, and "Irexit" was not plausible. She told the Radio 4 programme on Saturday that, in the event of no deal, Ireland was "not planning for the reintroduction of a border", and urged the UK to honour its commitment to ensure the border remained invisible, as it had since the Good Friday peace deal was signed nearly 21 years ago.
Questioned about the possibility by the BBC Today presenter John Humphrys, Ireland's Europe minister, Helen McEntee, said it was not contemplating quitting the EU, that polls showed 92% of the population wanted to remain in the bloc, and "Irexit" was not plausible.
She told the Radio 4 programme on Saturday that, in the event of no deal, Ireland was "not planning for the reintroduction of a border", and urged the UK to honour its commitment to ensure the border remained invisible, as it had since the Good Friday peace deal was signed nearly 21 years ago.
I have written about Irexit here. Nigel Farage and a couple of cronies have been trying to whip up a few discontents here. He hasn't been getting very far. Index of Frank's Diaries
It will be interesting to see how many other follow suit. It got coverage on Twitter after Ben Bradshaw, MP, commented.
British Lord Brings Up 'Idea of Recolonising Zimbabwe'
The Zimbabwean government has described as regrettable and unfortunate remarks by UK lawmaker Lord Adrian Palmer calling for Britain's recolonisation of Zimbabwe. Speaking in the House of Lords, independent cross-bench peer Lord Palmer asked: "Has the minister even considered the idea of recolonising Zimbabwe? It is tragic to see what is going on." British Foreign Office Minister Lord Ahmad said he had not considered that option.
We are deeply into the weeds of how much the madness of King George has spread amongst them keep to the Fen Causeway
I've begun to find BBC News unwatchable because the bias is just too overt keep to the Fen Causeway
Brexit planners are examining the possibility of martial law in Britain in the event of a "no-deal" Brexit, it has emerged. Whitehall officials are looking at how to use powers available under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 to stop civil disobedience after the UK leaves the EU. According to a report in The Sunday Times, the legislation gives ministers the power to impose curfews, travel bans, confiscate property and deploy the armed forces. A source told the newspaper: "The over-riding theme in all the no-deal planning is civil disobedience and the fear that it will lead to death in the event of food and medical shortages."
Whitehall officials are looking at how to use powers available under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 to stop civil disobedience after the UK leaves the EU.
According to a report in The Sunday Times, the legislation gives ministers the power to impose curfews, travel bans, confiscate property and deploy the armed forces.
A source told the newspaper: "The over-riding theme in all the no-deal planning is civil disobedience and the fear that it will lead to death in the event of food and medical shortages."
I guess Brexit means dictatorship then.
Britain has begun stockpiling food, fuel, spare parts and ammunition at military bases in Gibraltar, Cyprus and the Falklands in case of a no-deal Brexit, Sky News has learnt. Extra supplies are also being built up at bases in the UK to reduce the risk of the armed forces running short and being unable to operate if it suddenly becomes much harder to import and export day-to-day goods after 29 March.
Extra supplies are also being built up at bases in the UK to reduce the risk of the armed forces running short and being unable to operate if it suddenly becomes much harder to import and export day-to-day goods after 29 March.
Which invites the question: who are they planning to shoot after Brexit?
We are the country of Peterloo and Tonypandy. The upper classes always think the lower orders must occasionally be kept inline by the scent of blood and close quarters gunpowder. This is just the latest excuse keep to the Fen Causeway
Seems to me that a deal based on amending the GFA is pretty optimistic. The GFA took decades to negotiate, and depended on cooperation between organizations that haven't even been able get a government together in NI now for two years.
There are 60 days left.
Technically, and given the fondness of the UK for unwritten Constitutions, no amendment to the GFA is required. The UK government could simply agree a new Treaty stipulating that it will hold a referendum on N. Ireland remaining in, or re-joining the EU, should a majority there wish it and if no other way is found to avoid a hard customs border within Ireland.
That would solve the Irish border issue. Varadker could say it is up to the people of N. Ireland to decide whether they want a customs border with the south, and it is up to the UK to decide whether one is required down the Irish Sea - by deciding that Great Britain is leaving the CUSM. The Irish government will have had no hand, act, or part of deciding whether a customs border is required, and where it should be located - something it is politically impossible for it to do.
In the event of one being required down the Irish sea, the EU would require extra territorial control or supervision of that border as it would be within the UK, but also the EU's new external frontier. So a new three party UK/IE/EU agreement would be required.
The EU has already agreed N. Ireland can join the EU automatically in the event of Irish re-unification - a la East Germany. That agreement, too, would have to be extended to include a circumstance where N. Ireland remains within the UK, but also has democratically expressed its wish to remain within the EU (or rejoin it if after Brexit day).
Not being a sovereign territory, N. Ireland would have its own MEPs (as currently) but not its own Commissioner or representation on the EU Council etc. That part of its external affairs would effectively be handled by Dublin rather than London.
In my view an elegant solution to the GFA's requirement to guarantee parity of esteem for both traditions in N. Ireland. It would remain in both the EU and UK, and it's citizens could continue to opt for British or Irish (and EU) citizenship, as at present.
Of course the DUP would oppose it as a step towards a United Ireland. Hence it is something the UK government could only agree after the Withdrawal Agreement and other essential amending legislation to enable Brexit is passed by the House of Commons.
That is why I am suggesting May's deal should voted on by the house of Commons NOW with an amending clause limiting the backstop to two years after the transition period is concluded - i.e. Dec. 31st. 2022. That is beyond the life of this Parliament (and the DUP's likely control of the balance of power) similar to the amendment proposed by Andrew Murrison MP (Cons).
Of course the EU and IE will continue to insist on the Backstop until such time as the new tri-partite EU/IE/UK agreement is in place. That will be the EU/IE's price for ratifying the Withdrawal Agreement with the Backstop sunset clause and can only become public once all related legislation has been passed by Westminster and everyone is shit scared of an imminent no-deal Brexit. Index of Frank's Diaries
UK to warn of Brexit backstop's threat to Irish peace treaty
The detail is beyond my understanding, but the (UK) argument seems to be that the WA as it stands conflicts with the provisions of the GFA.
It follows accusations from DUP MPs and other leading unionists that the backstop itself contradicts the very historic peace agreement that it is designed to protect.
I'll leave others to comment if it is thought worthwhile to do so.
Tom McTague: EU officials NOT best pleased. "It's pretty desperate stuff," one diplomat said, rejecting the claim that the backstop itself undermined the Good Friday Agreement. "It's a bit rich. It's something of the devil quoting scripture for his own benefit." Remember: DUP opposed GFA 6/
That is "politically impossible" for either the Irish government or Brussels, according to one senior EU27 diplomat. "It's pretty desperate stuff," the diplomat said, rejecting the claim that the backstop itself undermined the Good Friday Agreement. "It's a bit rich. It's something of the devil quoting scripture for his own benefit."
"It's pretty desperate stuff," the diplomat said, rejecting the claim that the backstop itself undermined the Good Friday Agreement. "It's a bit rich. It's something of the devil quoting scripture for his own benefit."
I'll also freely admit that this game of three-dimensional chess is way too subtle for my understanding. I suppose it's like the rules of cricket: you have to be English to understand.
The problem with their proposal is that the Executive has not met for over two years because of an impasse between the two major parties - the DUP and Sinn Fein. Sinn Fein will never agree to its re-establishment if the purpose is simply to enable the DUP to block any divergence between N.I. and UK. - thus deepening community divisions still further.
Hence my proposal to extend the GFA's insistence that N. I. can only become part of a united Ireland by majority referendum vote to a circumstance where it can opt to become (or remain) part of the EU but remain part of the UK.
The DUP is playing a game here. They only got 28% of the vote in the 2017 Assembly elections and 36% in the Westminster elections. They lost the Brexit referendum 56-44% in N. Ireland and yet they are trying to impose their will on all in N. Ireland. They would therefore probably lose a N.I. referendum vote on EU membership, but successfully block it in the Executive (which requires explicit bi-community support).
But which is the greater constitutional change in N. Ireland, Brexit or some customs controls in the Irish Sea? I think my proposal of a referendum is fairer, less divisive, and won't block the re-establishment of power sharing in the interim. Brexit should not be driven entirely by one minority party but should require the support of a majority in all communities.
Basically my proposal just requires a simple agreement between UK/IE/EU that N.I. can rejoin the EU if a majority there vote in favour in a referendum to be held if no other means of keeping the Irish border has been agreed by end 2022. Alternatively, the agreement could stipulate that N.I. just rejoins the CUSM - thus also keeping the border open. The problem here is that N.I farmers would lose their CAP payments and farming would become uneconomic - their call... Index of Frank's Diaries
"The senior U.K. official said it is imperative for the U.K. to win a legally enforceable concession from Brussels to win back the support of the DUP -- and with them potentially scores of Tory MPs. "The DUP want to be able to say to their voters: `We made Theresa May make Leo Varadkar do this.'"
"The DUP want to be able to say to their voters: `We made Theresa May make Leo Varadkar do this.'"
When the major supermarkets are asking the government to avoid No Deal at any cost, while the same government is making plans for martial law - things probably won't end well.
There was more drama about the backstop, but everything the Tories do is bonkers anyway, so who knows where we'll be by the end of the week.
Suggestions? It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
Can't the Tory government simply move on a national security paradigm, due to universal stress in the UK, and call out Martial Law which would include a House of Commons shutdown with no reimbursement of lost income.
○ It's time to forget the games ...
UK begins EU citizen registration amid uncertainty, stress (_link) pic.twitter.com/zQPHed0LjR— Reuters Top News (@Reuters) January 21, 2019
UK begins EU citizen registration amid uncertainty, stress (_link) pic.twitter.com/zQPHed0LjR
○ How to apply for "settled status" for EU citizens
○ Brexit App Still Only Works on Android as Shitshow Continues
As a disabled EU citizen in the UK who's lived here for years, I can only apply for settled status through @ukhomeoffice's 📲 app or ID document scanner location 🏤. The app is only accessible w/ an Android which I don't have, and🏤is far. See the conundrum?! #RemoveBarriers 😡😤— Amalie Quevedo (@AmalieQuevedo) January 21, 2019
As a disabled EU citizen in the UK who's lived here for years, I can only apply for settled status through @ukhomeoffice's 📲 app or ID document scanner location 🏤. The app is only accessible w/ an Android which I don't have, and🏤is far. See the conundrum?! #RemoveBarriers 😡😤
Cross-posted from my diary - Pre-Brexit Chaos Ensues . Global Warming - distance between America and Europe is steadily increasing.
Ireland is uniquely vulnerable to Brexit with respect to trade with the UK. If any Brexiters have Indeed thought through the time-limit thing, it will be in terms of being able to impose very unfavourable terms of trade on Ireland (with or without an invisible border). It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
If I have thought of it, someone else has, too.
The pertinent question then is, How should I act? Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
Because it is the general agreement that is the sticking point, not the specific wording of the treaties. If general agreement can be reached in six months, then 18 months should be sufficient to get the treaties written up.
The opposition amendments first and the Brady amandment last. The DUP will suppport the Brady or Brexiteer (ERG) amendment.
Full list: amendments to May's statement on defeat of her Brexit bill Below are the amendments which will be voted upon, as selected by Speaker John Bercow. This is the order in which they will be taken: A: Labour's O: The SNP's G: Dominic Grieve's B: Yvette Cooper's J: Rachel Reeves' I: Caroline Spelman's N: Graham Brady's If the Labour motion is passed, the SNP's one will fall (that is, it will not be put to a vote). And if the Cooper amendment is passed, the Reeves one will fall.
Below are the amendments which will be voted upon, as selected by Speaker John Bercow. This is the order in which they will be taken:
A: Labour's
O: The SNP's
G: Dominic Grieve's
B: Yvette Cooper's
J: Rachel Reeves'
I: Caroline Spelman's
N: Graham Brady's
If the Labour motion is passed, the SNP's one will fall (that is, it will not be put to a vote). And if the Cooper amendment is passed, the Reeves one will fall.
Order! Order! Order! pic.twitter.com/WjvKZWGTPu— tagesschau (@tagesschau) January 16, 2019
Order! Order! Order! pic.twitter.com/WjvKZWGTPu
Ominous development ... UK CRASHING OUT ON MARCH 29 Global Warming - distance between America and Europe is steadily increasing.
Now voting on the Spelman amendment ... is carried 318 to 310 to prevent a no-deal A small majority, is not legally binding!
Now the vote on the Brady amendment takes place. Global Warming - distance between America and Europe is steadily increasing.
Forget that this ... thing ... is "not legally binding"; there's no action specified by the bill which to "bind" parliamentary acts. Not even appropriation for funds to print a commemorative postage stamp.
(US-Eng.) The Spellman amendment "expresses the sense" of the House of Commons that "leaving the European Union without [signing the] Withdrawal Agreement and a Framework for the Future Relationship [ETA]" is not a desirable policy choice.
The Brady amendment to the UK (Withdrawal) Bill is equally stupid in that it does not propose what "alternative arrangements to avoid a hard border" to the "backstop" for consideration by parliament. The only feature keeping it alive for vote is
Theresa May has ordered Conservative MPs to vote for this amendment. Some Conservative rebels, who voted against the prime minister two weeks ago, have said it is too vague and does not address their other concerns about her deal. Others, such as former foreign secretary Boris Johnson, said they would support it if Mrs May indicated that she will press the EU to re-open the withdrawal agreement to make changes to the backstop that would be legally binding - something she has told MPs that she will do.
Some Conservative rebels, who voted against the prime minister two weeks ago, have said it is too vague and does not address their other concerns about her deal.
Others, such as former foreign secretary Boris Johnson, said they would support it if Mrs May indicated that she will press the EU to re-open the withdrawal agreement to make changes to the backstop that would be legally binding - something she has told MPs that she will do.
"There's no negotiation between the EU and UK, that negotiation is finished."The EU's Deputy Chief Negotiator for Brexit Sabine Weyand says that the controversial 'backstop' was heavily shaped by British negotiators and that it will not be amended. pic.twitter.com/c5LRGJfmlY— Channel 4 News (@Channel4News) January 28, 2019
"There's no negotiation between the EU and UK, that negotiation is finished."The EU's Deputy Chief Negotiator for Brexit Sabine Weyand says that the controversial 'backstop' was heavily shaped by British negotiators and that it will not be amended. pic.twitter.com/c5LRGJfmlY
I'm sure they will light fires with such accusations to keep us warm as the wolves circle keep to the Fen Causeway
A spokesman for European Council president Donald Tusk says the Irish backstop is "part of the withdrawal agreement and the withdrawal agreement is not open for renegotiation"— Sky News Breaking (@SkyNewsBreak) January 29, 2019
A spokesman for European Council president Donald Tusk says the Irish backstop is "part of the withdrawal agreement and the withdrawal agreement is not open for renegotiation"
Yet to find an original source from the EU Council spokesperson ... Global Warming - distance between America and Europe is steadily increasing.
Has anyone known Barnier not to do what he says? Anyone?
archived EC | Michel Barnier, the European Commission's Chief Negotiator for the negotiations with the United Kingdom | An ambitious partnership with the UK after Brexit, 2 Aug 2018
"I'd be surprised as hell, if Barnier --after what he's been through wrangling 'banking union'....", Dec 2017 Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
Don't expect any leniency from Brussels. The mandate of PM May is to keep the Tory party together at all costs. The EU already made clear the preferred outcome was a partnership in the common market and a deal between friends. Westminster and the British MPs have shown a bellicose attitude towards Brussels and encouraged the Brexiteers (ERG) to come forward with an idiot proposal.
What needs to be done in the media and on blogs to spell it out very clearly what a fools' game te Conservatives have played these two years of "negotiations". The trade deal to be negotiated will start with a Dover cliff hangover. Good luck with that London! Only a few persons will be smiling ... Trump will be one of them. Sue the EU! Global Warming - distance between America and Europe is steadily increasing.
Brussels sees through the British shenanigans and have concluded PM May has failed to unite the House of Commons. One thing Westminster has proven in yesterday's vote: the members of the ERG group and the DUP cannot be trusted. The need for the Irish border backstop as insurance has been made clear. Brussels sees the vote on the amendments as tactical with no substance. The British politicians have failed their constituents and their (former) partners in the EU.
This morning the EU has realized that the no-deal scenario is real and likely preferred because at least it gives certainty. The economic hardship will be great on both sides. Global Warming - distance between America and Europe is steadily increasing.
In terms of internal Tory politics, it's a win. In terms of UK public opinion, it's probably a win too.
In terms of keeping the UK on its delusional suicidal trajectory to the cliff edge, it's a triumph. It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
Little matter that the EU is acting largely to protect the interests of a much smaller member state, Ireland, and the voiceless nationalist community in N. Ireland. Sinn Fein is coming in for a lot of criticism in Ireland for its abstentionist policy in Westminster which means that DUP politicians can claim, without blushing, to be speaking on behalf of both communities in N. Ireland.
Sinn Fein's 7 MPs in Westminster may or may not make a crucial difference to the numbers game in Westminster if they took their seats, but it would certainly change the media narrative currently dominated by the DUP. Index of Frank's Diaries
... the voiceless nationalist community in N. Ireland. Sinn Fein is coming in for a lot of criticism in Ireland for its abstentionist policy in Westminster...
I can understand that the oath of allegiance to the UK Crown, that a sitting MP is required to take, is an impossible act for an Irish Republican representative. This has the unfortunate consequences of loss of voice that you describe.
Apart from the Lambeg Drum Beat of the DUP, we hear far too little opinion from NI. Farming and business BBC programmes occasionally interview a very concerned spokesperson who expresses their concern cautiously as is required by their local politics.
Almost nothing is heard of the nationalist viewpoint. I find that concerning. Are nationalists keeping quiet and letting the Tories get on with destabilising the GFA or are their voices being ignored in the UK?
Leo Varadker has no track record on N. Ireland politics or policy, and yet is left to do almost all the heavy lifting. Index of Frank's Diaries
* In at least one case because the EU is the vehicle of the antichrist.
Even then there was some debate within the party and mixed feelings about supporting the Remain side - something Sinn Fein is rather coy about admitting now. With the DUP supporting Brexit, it had little choice but to support Remain as the issue became refracted by the sectarian divide in N.Ireland.
As a nationalist party it opposed European integration and as it moved leftward it increasingly embraced left wing critiques of the neo-liberalism, globalisation, and neo-imperialism of the EU.
But now Brexit has provided it with a stick to beat the DUP with and an opportunity to become part of a pro-EU majority in the North - almost as a proxy for a united Ireland. So prior opposition has been replaced by a muted scepticism, if not down right enthusiasm.
Past opposition to almost anything EU has been consigned to a memory hole. Index of Frank's Diaries
by tyronen - Mar 25 14 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 22 71 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 20 32 comments
by Oui - Mar 18 21 comments
by gmoke - Mar 19 2 comments
by IdiotSavant - Mar 14 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 15 50 comments
by Oui - Mar 15 25 comments
by tyronen - Mar 2514 comments
by Oui - Mar 248 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 2271 comments
by Oui - Mar 214 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 2032 comments
by gmoke - Mar 192 comments
by Oui - Mar 1821 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 1550 comments
by Oui - Mar 1525 comments
by IdiotSavant - Mar 142 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 138 comments
by IdiotSavant - Mar 1211 comments
by Oui - Mar 1138 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 841 comments
by Oui - Mar 830 comments
by Oui - Mar 312 comments
by Oui - Mar 22 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 27131 comments
by Oui - Feb 242 comments
by Oui - Feb 1121 comments