The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Zelensky does not seem hard pressed to agree to what Trump suggest, rather he seems ethusiastic. And the arms support does not seem to have been contingent on an agreement. So if this is extortion, it is only in the sense that when the sole super power calls the threat is always present. And I doubt the US wants to criminalise that.
Zelensky is not invited to meddle in the US election as such, but encouraged to investigate possible foul deeds in Ukraine (with repercussions on US politics). Having been elected on a anti-corruption platform this is a natural fit for his stated politics. It will interesting to see if it goes anywhere, considering the rumours of connections between Burisma and the oligarch Kolomoyskyi, who also supported Zelensky's career. Anyway, as Ukrainian president I would assume that can (obeying the proper forms) order the prosecutors to investigate foul deeds in Ukraine. Asking a foreign president to investigate crimes in accordance with their laws (including investigations that have political consequences) is also something the US does and probably doesn't want to criminalise.
So, I do get the abuse of power aspect - the president has to be prevented from bringing the full weight of the govenrment apparatus on his opponents - but I don't get what the felony is.
It is clear from the writings of the founders of the nation that it was specifically to remedy such acts, seen as potentially fatal to the survival of the nation as a representative republic, that the impeachment clauses were ADDED to the Constitution before it was submitted for ratification. Bribery is specifically enumerated as a cause of impeachment.
The term 'High crimes and misdemeanors' is not limited to specifically illegal acts. It also covers actions that are detrimental to the good governance of the nation. The fact that such acts may have been committed but not prosecuted in previous administrations is no defense. It also covers acts such as obstruction of justice that are also criminal offenses.
"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by eurogreen - Jun 28 23 comments
by gmoke - Jun 28
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 27 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 3 4 comments
by Oui - Jun 25 12 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 16 10 comments
by Oui - Jun 17 56 comments
by Oui - Jun 15 8 comments
by Oui - Jul 52 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 34 comments
by gmoke - Jun 29
by eurogreen - Jun 2823 comments
by gmoke - Jun 28
by Oui - Jun 2712 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 271 comment
by Oui - Jun 2512 comments
by Oui - Jun 1756 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1610 comments
by Oui - Jun 158 comments
by Oui - Jun 1210 comments
by Oui - Jun 89 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 79 comments
by Oui - Jun 767 comments
by Oui - May 29163 comments
by Oui - May 22123 comments