Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Preppers' lede into the first day of senate Q&A echoes yesterday evening's WSJ, WaPo headline--behind the paywalls. Expect robust interpretations of Q's by reports over next two days to divine leading nominees.

McConnell: Republicans don't have the votes to block witnesses in impeachment trial, reports say

McConnell told Republicans in a closed-door meeting Tuesday that they did not have the votes to block additional witnesses from being called in the president's impeachment trial, according to multiple media reports.

The revelation, first reported by the Wall Street Journal, means that A HOST OF WITNESSES could be considered as part of the trial, potentially lengthening the proceedings significantly.

Allowing witnesses would give Democrats a major win.

simple majority, cattle call for actors
If there are 51 votes, senators could propose hearing from a VARIETY OF WITNESSES and asking for A HOST OF DOCUMENTS. It could open the door for both Democrats and Republicans to call those at the top of their list, including John Bolton, the president's former national security adviser, Mick Mulvaney, Trump's acting chief of staff, along with GOP-witnesses, such as the whistleblower whose complaint helped launch the impeachment inquiry and Hunter Biden, the former vice president's son.
cold water
A senior Republican aide noted the headlines and pointed out that a lot could change in the days before the vote on witnesses, which currently is planned for Friday.
yep, majority and minority leaders' "deal" on procedure--case-by-case vote to admit each witness, for example, would dramatically deflate the draft calendar, if Bolton and his Mystery Date sit for x-examination by managers as expected.

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Wed Jan 29th, 2020 at 03:12:37 PM EST
by Cat on Wed Jan 29th, 2020 at 03:44:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
One Q&A "phase", two stories

Politico | 12 questions to expect at Trump's impeachment trial
Conclusion seems to rely on private agreement between minority and majority leaders or an interpretation of Clinton trial procedures, which is not cited.

NPR | Impeachment Trial Moves To Question Phase, While Witness Vote Looms
Does not corroborate Politico procedural assumptions.
--
Neither mentions 5-min. time limit for managers' responses.

Neither contemplates rebuttal by "managers" to each response to alternating questions by senators.

Neither expects the purported "clearing house" (Politico) to order questions submitted by senators dynamically, ie. as pertinent to response immediately preceding the alternate question.

supra
amateur transcript
Congressional Record (pdf, p 9)

Mr. MCCONNELL.  Mr. Chief Justice, I have reached an agreement with the Democratic leader on how to proceed during the question period. Therefore, I ask unanimous consent that the question period for Senators start when the Senate reconvenes on Wednesday; further, that the questions alternate between the majority and minority sides for up to 8 hours during that session of the Senate; and finally, that on Thursday, the Senate resume time for Senators' questions, alternating between sides for up to 8 hours during that session of the Senate.
[...]
The CHIEF JUSTICE. During the impeachment trial of  President Clinton,The CHIEF JUSTICE. During the impeachment trial of President Clinton, Chief Justice Rehnquist advised "counsel on both sides that the Chair will operate on a rebuttable presumption that each question  can be fully and fairly answered in 5 minutes or less." The transcript indicates that the statement was met with "laughter." Chief Justice Rehnquist advised "counsel on both sides that the Chair will operate on a rebuttable presumption that each question can be fully and fairly answered in 5 minutes or  less." The transcript indicates that the statement was met with "laughter."
by Cat on Wed Jan 29th, 2020 at 06:11:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Prayer, pledge, proclamation buried ... annnnnd Q&A is off!

McConnell recaps. Majority leads with a collective Q submitted by 4 (R) senators (There's a twist!), addressed to (R) managers by COLLINS, concerning MOTIVE

< wipes tears >

by Cat on Wed Jan 29th, 2020 at 06:20:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Democratic leader silently passes Q, which is read aloud by CJ. Roberts, to House manager for response.

Recaps amount and value of aid to Ukraine. Flogs necessity to call BOLTON "a subpoena away" testimony.

< wipes tears >

by Cat on Wed Jan 29th, 2020 at 06:26:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
replies SCHIFF "Don't wait until MARCH 17TH."
(another NS advisor might publish a memoir?)
with two (2) video clips to illustrate
by Cat on Wed Jan 29th, 2020 at 06:29:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
(R) senator Q addressed specifically to (R) Mr Counsel to rebut Schiff's response.

< wipes tears >

My work is done here. Checks watch. Returning at lunch. Buh bye.

by Cat on Wed Jan 29th, 2020 at 06:32:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
White House tells Bolton his manuscript contains classified material, cannot be published
The letter from the White House National Security Council to Bolton's attorney, Charles Cooper, and seen by Reuters, said the manuscript contained some material that was considered "TOP SECRET" that could reasonably be expected to cause "exceptionally grave harm" to U.S. national security if disclosed without authorization.
uh oh. Bolton's atty and Bolton's publisher got some splainin to do.
The letter, which was sent via email to Cooper, was dated Jan. 23.
[...]
The letter, signed by Ellen Knight, the senior director for records, access and information security management, said Bolton's manuscript was still being studied.

"The manuscript remains under review in order for us to do our best to assist your client by identifying the classified information within the manuscript," it said. "We will do our best to work with you to ensure your client's ability to tell his story in a manner that protects U.S. national security."

hmm, I'd had the impression from press reporting on the whistleblower-who-must-not-be-named's expert counsel that IC, NSC, NSA had a veritable mill running out clean manuscripts for ret'd officers.
by Cat on Wed Jan 29th, 2020 at 08:45:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series