Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
I do another drive-by: Bennet is "killing it" now, it being conceptualization of a fair trial in the USA. Without witnesses.

I must have missed the part about plea bargaining in hall ways by public defenders.

They're still at it, reading statements to "cover-up" the moral ambiguity inherent in US legislation and warfare, also known as rationales to convict or not to convict the current "leader of the free world" mounted on that "city on the hill".

Next.

by Cat on Wed Feb 5th, 2020 at 06:39:24 PM EST
btw, camera POV from ceiling: the chamber is empty. The Desk ("C.J. Roberts") appears to be wearing a wig of very long, light brown hair.

Senator from Wisconsin (not that one, the other one) seizes the podium to lecture on impartial judgment, full fair and honest trial, and defense of the US Constitution.

buh-bye.

by Cat on Wed Feb 5th, 2020 at 06:43:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
So yeah. I took a long coffee break with my PPC buddy, and while I was gone, the trial of the century ended, temporarily. (Note to self: Act II, 1 Mar-3 Nov 2020) I first perceived the verdict through the lenses of twitterverse retweets alternately! portraying Mitt Romney as an object "high character" < wipes tears > or  cold  opprobrium.< wipes tears > I'm thinking, wahthafu...so I hit USAToday.

I'm wondering, to hell wit dat. 52-48 (Art. I), 53-47 (Art. II). From under which floorboard did the 'new' acquittal votes come?! Shadow app?? < wipes tears > Rather than read USAToday's version, I'll read the Congressional Record tomorrow a.m. -- That way I can cue the senators' "statements" in their own words, in their entirety to the dismal deeds. woo boy howdy, that's got to be some rationale.

by Cat on Wed Feb 5th, 2020 at 11:10:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The roll calls are not balanced "along party lines", because a few senators split their votes by article. DOH. Be that a provocative symptom of political ambivalence as it may, any urgency to investigate the particulars escapes me.
by Cat on Thu Feb 6th, 2020 at 05:35:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The day will come, when senators do not convict a POTUS of all charges, perhaps 1/2 or 2/8. Then what? The twitterverse quantum explosion of rancorous senate rules versus norms "analyses" and recommended sentencing procedure.
by Cat on Thu Feb 6th, 2020 at 05:40:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Suppliants will rush the Chief Justice and fall to their knees. "What shall we do? Oh, how do you decide?" Then, and only then, will The Desk pull out one of Gödel's flaming incompleteness theorems from a voluminous sleeve. "The normal rule is that all the votes fail."
by Cat on Thu Feb 6th, 2020 at 05:52:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
m'k. No Congressional Record, Congressional Record, Issue: Vol. 166, No. 24 printed as yet. I suppose, I ought attribute the delay to postponement of senators' statements until 26 Feb; 100% receipts needed "officially" to close the trial record.

OTOH, the secretary of the senate turfed a copy of the verdict to Secretary of State Pompeo for his officious autograph, 5 Feb 2020.

by Cat on Thu Feb 6th, 2020 at 05:28:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Congressional Record, Issue: Vol. 166, No. 24, February 5, 2020

Duly noted sections:
[...]
4. RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME
[...]

  1. IMPEACHMENT
  2. RECOGNITION OF THE MINORITY LEADER
  3. STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS
  4. IMPEACHMENT
  5. RECESS SUBJECT TO THE CALL OF THE CHAIR
  6. TRIAL OF DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
  7. ADJOURNMENT SINE DIE OF THE COURT OF IMPEACHMENT
[...]

DICTION CORNER
adjournment sine die
discursion
Duhaime's Law Dictionary
Project Gutenberg
practices
Glosbe.com | translation memory
The Hindu | Parliament adjourned sine die (2018)

by Cat on Fri Feb 7th, 2020 at 09:17:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series