Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
It's not that Cameron's deal was too complex, it was that he'd set up a narrative beforehand of "Victory or Referendum".

What the media expected was for Cameron to go to Brussels and give them a Thatcher-esque handbagging. When Cameron emerged from the meeting conspicuously lacking Angela Merkel's head on a plate, the obvious tabloid interpretation was that he'd failed.

Farage seized his opportunity to shout into every microphone he could see (and there were many) that Europe could not be negotiated with. Given the expectations he'd already set up, by the time Cameron got near a microphone, he was already a loser.

Cameron's problem was that, although he was Prime Minister, he was really only playing one on TV. He had no political intelligence, no low cunning. He should never have fallen into making himself hostage to an impossible bargain in the cheap way that he did.In this he was consistently outplayed by flyweights like Boris and Gove. But, given his Eton and Oxford background he thought he'd be good at poltics because he was privileged and entitled and so deserved it. The idea that it had to be worked for and worked at simply never occured to him.

The moment he encountered a difficulty, he resigned. It would have been better for everybody if he'd retired to the library with a good cigar, a bottle of whisky and a revolver. Indeed he could have done that in 2010 for the betterment of us all. But we aren't so blessed with men of principle nowadays. Just over-promoted chancers

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Mon Feb 18th, 2019 at 03:42:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:

Display:

Occasional Series