Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
HLS Review | Segregation by Citizenship, March 2019
In 1954, Jacob Javits, then a New York representative to Congress, "protested the use of prisons" on the ground that detaining noncitizens in penal institutions was "disruptive . . . of our social concept of the purposes of a prison."90

There are two ways to understand this objection. As Javits argued to the press, housing detainees in prisons scrambled the distinction between criminal and civil incarceration, casting all immigrants as criminals.91 Confining detainees in prisons also violated prevailing norms around the use of penal institutions. The mid-twentieth century was the height of the rehabilitative ideal, a theory of punishment in which prisons serve to reform criminals through individualized, therapeutic treatment.92 This conception of punishment presumed prisoners' eventual release and reintegration into the United States.93 Holding detainees -- a class of people not yet admitted into the polity, who might ultimately be expelled -- in prisons undermined this vision of "corrections" and conflicted with dominant assumptions about the relationship between prisons and American society.

BONUS popular, modern fallacy:
54 See LUCY E. SALYER, LAWS HARSH AS TIGERS: CHINESE IMMIGRANTS AND THE SHAPING OF MODERN IMMIGRATION LAW 3 (1995). As Professor Hiroshi Motomura has noted, federal laws regulating the movement of "free blacks and slaves" can also be understood as early immigration laws. HIROSHI MOTOMURA, IMMIGRATION OUTSIDE THE LAW 65 (2014).


Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Tue Apr 9th, 2019 at 08:52:32 PM EST

Others have rated this comment as follows:

Display:

Top Diaries

Occasional Series