Notwithstanding the facts of this particular case o detailed substance of the opinions filed, SCOTUS appears to agree (across party lines) to limit scope of US gov "common law" enforcement.

While some readers will be immediately delighted by the implication for parallel prosecutions by states of Trump's suspicious conduct, the timing of SCOTUS opinion is portentous. In the short-term, pending  voter rights challenge to states' district maps: 15th Amd; in the long-term, high-frequency abrogation to states' "conscience clause" exceptions.

Which "ideological leaning" will progressives blame then?

reference
incorporation doctrine
"selective incorporation", table

archived
US is so headed for a carnival of broke-ass, sovereign states' wildlife.
Limbs va. Indiana
"incorporated protection applicable to the States", Ginsburg vs Thomas

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

[T]he language of the Clause ... protects  individuals from being twice put in jeopardy 'for the same offence,' not for the same conduct or actions," Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508, 529 (1990), as Justice  Scalia wrote in a soon-vindicated dissent, see United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S. 688 (1993) (overruling Grady). ... As originally understood, then, an "offence"  is defined by a law, and each law is defined by a sovereign. So where there are two sovereigns, there are two laws, and two "offences." See Grady, 495 U.S., at 529 (Scalia, J., dissenting) ("If the same conduct violates two (or more) laws then each offense may be separately prosecuted")

In case of Curtis Flowers, who was tried six times for the same murders, #SCOTUS holds that the prosecutor's repeated use of peremptory challenges to remove black people from the jury pool violated the Constitution

KEYWORD: Mississippi (ironically sovereign), double-jeopardy, incorporation doctrine (ironically selective)

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

The man who accused Kevin Spacey of groping him at a Massachusetts resort island bar in 2016 asserted his Fifth Amendment [wut] right against self-incrimination [wut] and refused to testify Monday after being questioned about text messages [Spacey's] defense [atty] claims were deleted.

After being pressed by Spacey's lawyer about whether he knew that altering evidence used in a prosecution is a crime, the man invoked [Fifth Amendment protection], and the judge said his testimony Monday would be stricken from the record.
[...]
The judge said he would not immediately dismiss the case, but acknowledged prosecutors would have a tough time bringing it to trial if the man won't testify. "Once exercised, it may be pretty hard to get around this privilege at trial," Judge Thomas Barrett said.

The allegations were first made in 2017 by the man's mother, former Boston TV anchor Heather Unruh. ...Unruh told investigators that she deleted items concerning her son's "frat boy activities" from the phone before giving it to authorities. She acknowledged Monday deleting things that "concerned" her but denied touching text messages or anything else relevant to the case.

Senators REACT! to emerging "Ihren trade secrets, bitte?" applications of the ruling
Lawmakers talk legislation in response to FOIA changes

"Transparency laws like the Freedom of Information Act [FOIA] help provide access to information in the face of an opaque and obstinate government. Unfortunately, a recent Supreme Court ruling and new regulations at EPA and the Department of Interior are undermining access," [Grassley!] said in a late June speech on the Senate floor.