Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
If by "turnip" you refer to the root vegetable that fell off the truck this morning: a credulous, gullible, naive person.

"Intelligence" having little to do with measurement of one's proficiency applying alegbraic or arithmetic or geometry rules sets to manipulation of quantitative values. Then again, it's my view 95% of any functional skill sets (lately aided by CS computational fomulae) require no more sophistication than rudimentary rote mastery and application of algebraic and geometric ahh (theorem) postulates.

death of "long division"

Statistical information has a valuable place in estimating limits of tangible, physical properties (ie. periodic elements) of things manufactured by people for people consumption. Mechanical engineering would not normally include "psychology," it is true, if only because granularity of interaction observations between these physical properties relative to human physiology and their certain expression are unknown, indeterminate or immeasurable. Why pretend otherwise?

I have seen things (ROY, Blade Runner) over the past 35 years that suggest to me, innumeracy produced in the generations of students proceeding from my own is systematically determined by people who control political economy of a population. That is to say, innumeracy begins with public and "private" educators who do not exercise analytical principles in pedagogy. Instead they train their pupils in keyboard codes which symbolize unstated assumptions. Proficiency with keyboard codes is what standardized examinations measures. Consequently, many students, regardless of "scientific" interest in a particular vocation, are trained to reproduce instantiated, or dogmatic, ethical conclusions. They emerge from degree programs without experience with or skepticism toward the subject in hand which they purport to assay.

death of "p-value"

All this before one even attempts to verify THE central limit theorem--on which every westworld decision relies--with actual enumeration by subjects empaneled and inferences extrapolated from a sample; all this before one validates methodology ascribed to big data set compiled by 3 < x > 65* co-authors transforming "qualitative" responses from sundry data-collection devices--motives, mes rhea, or, shall we say, "psychometric data", to quantitative units relative to normal distributions of "prior art", describing wtf values in any given period. Baseline reference to people, process, or thing is not constant: Let's agree. Think about that the next time someone starts yammering about "progressive" policy benefit. When certainty no longer obtains objective precursors of recursive experimental observation, it is indeed time to evaluate standardized criteria of "the good" for every case. So much for universal law.

death of "The Bell Curve"

I could share inexplicable "statistics for psychology" curriculum, provided by my associate, that defined by or satisfice proficiency in python programming to collate rat or mice subject trial observations said to represent human physiology, of which human "cognitive" systems, but I won't. Objective "basic research" hit the nadir of plausible "applied science" while you were Googling. Res ipsa loquitor.

B. Russell and K. Popper philosophical treatises on subjectivity short: Barriers to "intelligence" and "truth" measurement are ubiquitous and artificial. For example, The World of Mathematics (1956) vol. 1-IV are not public domain material. Somewhere therein J.R. Newman is reported to caution "turnips"**.

Mathematical economics is old enough to be respectable, but not all economists respect it. It has powerful supporters and impressive testimonials, yet many capable economists deny that mathematics, except as a shorthand or expository device, can be applied to economic reasoning. There have even been rumors that mathematics is used in economics (and in other social sciences) either for the deliberate purpose of mystification or to confer dignity upon commonplaces as French was once used in diplomatic communications. .... To be sure, mathematics can be extended to any branch of knowledge, including economics, provided the concepts are so clearly defined as to permit accurate symbolic representation. That is only another way of saying that in some branches of discourse it is desirable to know what you are talking about.

--
* longest published citation I have observed

** True story. Talked today with yet another immigrant (taxi driver) who didn't know he was "Black or African American" until he arrived in the USA. What else didn't he know? Need I ask in order to qualify "intelligence."

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Tue Jul 30th, 2019 at 09:44:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:

Display:

Occasional Series