Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Fintan O'Toole: Welcome to the United Kingdom of Absurdistan.
Britain's democracy is built on feudalism and its unwritten constitution is feeble
Brexit is a very strange kind of revolution - the heroic overthrow of imaginary oppression, in which tragedy and farce are not sequential but simultaneous and deeply interwoven. But it is a revolution nonetheless, and it is conforming to these patterns. A goal that was unutterable in 2016 - the Year Zero of No Deal - is now mainstream policy. And the ancien regime of the Westminster system is having all its delusions mercilessly exposed by, of all places, Italy.

One thing that still unites the warring factions in England is the belief that Westminster is "the mother of all parliaments" and the envy of the democratic world. Well, it sure looks like the mother of all something right now, but it's not parliamentary democracy. Consider what has happened. Boris Johnson was elected leader of the Tory party by 92,153 people. He was then appointed prime minister by a hereditary monarch with no parliamentary involvement whatsoever. Since July 24th, when he became prime minister, he has appeared just once in the House of Commons to answer questions. And he has now used those monarchical powers to prorogue parliament and make himself even more unaccountable to it. The one virtue of Johnson's brazenness is that he has surely made obvious to his compatriots what outsiders can see - that the system in which all of this is possible is a democracy built around a solid core of feudalism.

To grasp the absurdity of this spectacle, we might turn to one of England's great minds, Jonathan Sumption. He is simultaneously one of his country's most distinguished lawyers, recently retired from the UK's supreme court, and one of its leading historians, whose superb ongoing multivolume history of the Hundred Years War is much better than Game of Thrones. Last week, the London Times asked him to pronounce on the legality of Johnson's prorogation of parliament. "I don't think what the prime minister has said he is going to do is unlawful," he said. But he added: "It might be considered unconstitutional in as much as it might be argued to be contrary to a longstanding convention of the constitution."

So what Johnson is doing is probably unconstitutional but probably not unlawful. I don't think most people in England have any idea how utterly nonsensical this seems to all the rest of us. It's like saying that a man is almost certainly dead but nonetheless in quite good health. In any other democracy, if it's unconstitutional, it's unlawful. Only in the United Kingdom of Absurdistan can it possibly be otherwise. And the heart of the absurdity is that great tautology, the "unwritten constitution".



Index of Frank's Diaries
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Tue Sep 3rd, 2019 at 09:25:51 AM EST
I think I've been saying very similar things for quite a while. I probably wouldn't have reviously put it as harshly as "fuedalism playing democratic charade", but I think the gloves have come off as the powers that be, those who pull strings behind the scenes, have decided that the enefits are too great to risk losing them by maintaining the fictions of democratic goverment.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Sep 3rd, 2019 at 09:02:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yep. And it is hard to blame the problems on the British constitution, given that the US, Israel, Italy, and several other democratic countries are suffering similar problems, even though the mechanical and legal structures of their governments are quite a bit different.
by asdf on Thu Sep 5th, 2019 at 02:30:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The form of all their governments is republican.

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Thu Sep 5th, 2019 at 03:22:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And the Italians have just solved their problem, because they have the structures - mainly a President with key powers - to actually resolve them - whereas the Queen has virtually no power to do anything useful.

Index of Frank's Diaries
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Thu Sep 5th, 2019 at 11:41:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Writing down your constitution hardly gives you a majority in the commons. As I understand it there would be ample time to install the Jam man as PM so he can ask for an extension and then call for new elections.
by generic on Thu Sep 5th, 2019 at 12:09:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
A majority in the Commons isn't required, see The Prisoner of No. 10

Index of Frank's Diaries
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Thu Sep 5th, 2019 at 12:15:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
HRM is president pro temp of UK parliament? Why don't IE or BE have one of those?

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Thu Sep 5th, 2019 at 09:10:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series