The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
>"Flattening the Curve" is a deadly delusion
The "flattening the curve" idea suggests that if we wash our hands and stay at home while being sick aggressively enough, we won't have to stop the virus from becoming endemic and infecting 40% to 70% of all people, but we can slow the spread of the infection so much that out medical system can deal with the case load. [...] Dampening the infection rate of COVID-19 to a level that is compatible with our medical system means that we would have to spread the epidemic over more than a decade!
And at least this writer is honest:
My curves are not correct! My back-of-the-envelope calculation is not a proper simulation, or a good model of what's going on either. Don't cite it as such! In reality, the spread of a disease does not follow a normal distribution.
My back-of-the-envelope calculation is not a proper simulation, or a good model of what's going on either. Don't cite it as such! In reality, the spread of a disease does not follow a normal distribution.
There's a bit of incorrect html on the end of the original [the <Br or %3CBr if you paste it into the address bar. ]
Truth is, people simply are not, may never be, sufficiently organized to test theory definitively. Free-range, liberal, etc. As important, European intellectual history abhors AUTHORITARIAN CIVIL indoctrination except religious instruction. So. Medieval medicine. Roll eyes.
ABSTRACT The term "herd immunity" is widely used but carries a variety of meanings [1-7]. Some authors use it to describe the proportion immune among individuals in a population. Others use it with reference to a particular threshold proportion of immune individuals that should lead to a decline in incidence of infection. Still others use it to refer to a pattern of immunity that should protect a population from invasion of a new infection. A common implication of the term is that the risk of infection among susceptible individuals in a population is reduced by the presence and proximity of immune individuals (this is sometimes referred to as "indirect protection" or a "herd effect"). We provide brief historical, epidemiologic, theoretical, and pragmatic public health perspectives on this concept.
The term "herd immunity" is widely used but carries a variety of meanings [1-7]. Some authors use it to describe the proportion immune among individuals in a population. Others use it with reference to a particular threshold proportion of immune individuals that should lead to a decline in incidence of infection. Still others use it to refer to a pattern of immunity that should protect a population from invasion of a new infection. A common implication of the term is that the risk of infection among susceptible individuals in a population is reduced by the presence and proximity of immune individuals (this is sometimes referred to as "indirect protection" or a "herd effect"). We provide brief historical, epidemiologic, theoretical, and pragmatic public health perspectives on this concept.
by gmoke - Nov 30
by gmoke - Nov 24
by gmoke - Nov 7
by gmoke - Nov 11
by Oui - Dec 4
by Oui - Dec 3
by Oui - Dec 312 comments
by Oui - Dec 2
by Oui - Dec 1
by Oui - Nov 303 comments
by Oui - Nov 302 comments
by Oui - Nov 30
by Oui - Nov 29
by Oui - Nov 28
by Oui - Nov 288 comments
by Oui - Nov 283 comments
by Oui - Nov 277 comments
by Oui - Nov 274 comments
by Oui - Nov 26
by Oui - Nov 262 comments