The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
There was so much politicking on Tuesday, a story slipped out in the late afternoon almost unnoticed. "Military travel issues resolved", reported the BBC. The ministry of defence had admitted it was all a misunderstanding on its part. The protocol contains an exemption to the military equipment requirement in the EU customs code, so paperwork had never been necessary. The ministry failed to spot this and instructed its officials to submit declarations. The UK never raised the issue at the implementation committees. Now both sides were truly as bad as each other. London had been as cavalier as Brussels in handling Northern Ireland with care - impeding its own army was a mistake every bit as extraordinary as the EU blocking medical supplies. In fairness to the UUP, it had said all along the fault probably lay with UK defence officials. However, the assumption was that they had rolled over to a maximum interpretation of the protocol, rather than simply not reading it. After the EU triggered article 16, the British government's restraint was widely praised. Might it have been tinged with sheepishness?
"Military travel issues resolved", reported the BBC.
The ministry of defence had admitted it was all a misunderstanding on its part. The protocol contains an exemption to the military equipment requirement in the EU customs code, so paperwork had never been necessary.
The ministry failed to spot this and instructed its officials to submit declarations. The UK never raised the issue at the implementation committees.
Now both sides were truly as bad as each other. London had been as cavalier as Brussels in handling Northern Ireland with care - impeding its own army was a mistake every bit as extraordinary as the EU blocking medical supplies.
In fairness to the UUP, it had said all along the fault probably lay with UK defence officials. However, the assumption was that they had rolled over to a maximum interpretation of the protocol, rather than simply not reading it.
After the EU triggered article 16, the British government's restraint was widely praised. Might it have been tinged with sheepishness?
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 23 9 comments
by Oui - Feb 22 12 comments
by Oui - Feb 25
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 20 9 comments
by gmoke - Feb 14 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 19 14 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 15 23 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 14 13 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 239 comments
by Oui - Feb 2212 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 209 comments
by Oui - Feb 2018 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 1914 comments
by Oui - Feb 197 comments
by Oui - Feb 18
by Oui - Feb 1766 comments
by Oui - Feb 168 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 1523 comments
by gmoke - Feb 142 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 1413 comments
by Oui - Feb 145 comments
by Oui - Feb 1243 comments
by Oui - Feb 774 comments
by Oui - Feb 667 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 518 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 412 comments
by Oui - Feb 136 comments