SO. Any officer such as executive, legislator, LE agent, or state licensee who deliberately contravenes US Constitutional law (by statute, ordinance, interdiction, or dereliction) to abridge legal protections afforded citizens expressly coded by the Civil Rights Act of 1866 et seq. and governed by 14th, 15th amdts among others,

is engaged in commission of a federal violation, entertaining both civil and criminal codes.

Accordingly, civil courts judge disputes of lawful intercourse between "private persons" according to standards of "equity law"--the balance of performance by litigants, if you will.

Real estate mortgage convenants are but one grotesque yet still active example how "free trade" in US operates under color of law and casually enforces political and economic inequity.

THE NUMBER of "private persons" who deliberately colluded, conspired, and/or materially benefited from such unlawful practices invoked by mundane ordinances or contested statutes
AND EXTENT TO WHICH all "private persons" who colluded, conspired, and/or materially benefited by such acts precisely because they and their descendants were not excluded

might appear to some to be untenable equation, but it's not. The variables are known and their values are all around us and quantifiable.

How would they know? How could they measure the injuries sanctioned by the state with which they abide and are directly and indirectly rewarded? Who's tending the ledger strapped to the family bible and shredding mementos? Why would they confess handicapping the competition in the great race from the middle to the top of the pyramid of US American ingenuity and leisure built on the back of slaves' unfree labor essential workers' industry? Thus, plausible deniability is a common feature in opposition today to class action reparations.