The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
UN seeks ICJ opinion on Israel's illegal occupation of Palestine [_link] via @AJEnglish #UN #UNGA #ICJ #Palestine #Palestinians #Israel #IsraeliApartheid #IsraeliOccupation— Gavin in Istanbul (@HappinessPatrol) December 31, 2022
UN seeks ICJ opinion on Israel's illegal occupation of Palestine [_link] via @AJEnglish #UN #UNGA #ICJ #Palestine #Palestinians #Israel #IsraeliApartheid #IsraeliOccupation
Palestine has won the right of #ICJ in the UN vote but has exposed the western nations like US, UK, Germany, Hungary, Romania and their double standards on Humans right for Ukraine but tried to deny the same for Palestinians. Western hypocrisy is exposed again.— Imaan Ali 🇬🇧🇮🇳🇵🇸 (@Muslimah_Imaan) December 31, 2022
Palestine has won the right of #ICJ in the UN vote but has exposed the western nations like US, UK, Germany, Hungary, Romania and their double standards on Humans right for Ukraine but tried to deny the same for Palestinians. Western hypocrisy is exposed again.
#uncharter #UNSCresolutions #hypocrisy #exposed 'Sapere aude'
Appalling European vote count at last night's UNGA. Despite talking about importance of international law viz Russia's invasion of Ukraine, only 7 European states felt this legal right also applies to Palestinians. Shockingly 10 voted against ICJ referral, including UK & Germany. [_link] pic.twitter.com/zvL9Rr7cOa— Hugh Lovatt (@h_lovatt) December 31, 2022
Appalling European vote count at last night's UNGA. Despite talking about importance of international law viz Russia's invasion of Ukraine, only 7 European states felt this legal right also applies to Palestinians. Shockingly 10 voted against ICJ referral, including UK & Germany. [_link] pic.twitter.com/zvL9Rr7cOa
1 \ Scoop: Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu called on Friday night Ukraine's President Zelensky & asked that his country vote against the UN general assembly resolution to refer the issue of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank to the ICJ, Israeli & Ukrainian officials told me— Barak Ravid (@BarakRavid) December 31, 2022
1 \ Scoop: Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu called on Friday night Ukraine's President Zelensky & asked that his country vote against the UN general assembly resolution to refer the issue of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank to the ICJ, Israeli & Ukrainian officials told me
At a ceremony Sunday, [tourism minister Haim] Katz said he would channel resources to promote tourism in the West Bank. "We will invest in areas that may not have received sufficient support to date," he said. "For example, our local Tuscany in Judea and Samaria," he added, using the biblical term for the West Bank favored by religious and right-wing Israelis. The West Bank settler community has developed a small tourism sector that includes hotels, bed and breakfasts and wineries. Israel considers these industries to be part of the country's broader tourism sector, while international human rights groups have said they deepen control of occupied territory. [...]
The West Bank settler community has developed a small tourism sector that includes hotels, bed and breakfasts and wineries. Israel considers these industries to be part of the country's broader tourism sector, while international human rights groups have said they deepen control of occupied territory. [...]
ICJ -- Declarations recognizing the jurisdiction of the Court as compulsory The States parties to the Statute of the Court may "at any time declare that they recognize as compulsory ipso facto and without special agreement, in relation to any other State accepting the same obligation, the jurisdiction of the Court" (Art. 36, para. 2, of the Statute). Each State which has recognized the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court has in principle the right to bring any one or more other States, which have accepted the same obligation, before the Court, by filing an application instituting proceedings with the Court. Conversely, it undertakes to appear before the Court should proceedings be instituted against it by one or more other such States. The declarations recognizing the jurisdiction of the Court as compulsory take the form of a unilateral act of the State concerned and are deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations. On 4 July 2018, Palestine deposited in the Registry of the Court a declaration ...
The States parties to the Statute of the Court may "at any time declare that they recognize as compulsory ipso facto and without special agreement, in relation to any other State accepting the same obligation, the jurisdiction of the Court" (Art. 36, para. 2, of the Statute).
Each State which has recognized the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court has in principle the right to bring any one or more other States, which have accepted the same obligation, before the Court, by filing an application instituting proceedings with the Court. Conversely, it undertakes to appear before the Court should proceedings be instituted against it by one or more other such States.
The declarations recognizing the jurisdiction of the Court as compulsory take the form of a unilateral act of the State concerned and are deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
On 4 July 2018, Palestine deposited in the Registry of the Court a declaration ...
The big three are lacking: China, Russia, United States 🙃
Quite amazing the demonstrations near the Carnegie Peace Palace which houses the Highest International Court in The Hague.
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory - July 2004 'Sapere aude'
Geneva Conventions and their additional protocols Despite being signatory to the Conventions, there are some notable and often-criticized U.S. cases involving conduct that would otherwise be prohibited by the Conventions, such as Hamdi v. Rumsfield (2004). In Hamdi, a U.S. citizen was accused of being a member of the Taliban forces on U.S. soil as an "enemy combatant," and was detained by unilateral Executive decision. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on the validity of his detention.
Despite being signatory to the Conventions, there are some notable and often-criticized U.S. cases involving conduct that would otherwise be prohibited by the Conventions, such as Hamdi v. Rumsfield (2004). In Hamdi, a U.S. citizen was accused of being a member of the Taliban forces on U.S. soil as an "enemy combatant," and was detained by unilateral Executive decision.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on the validity of his detention.
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 11 11 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 8 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 6 4 comments
by gmoke - Mar 7
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 2 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 5 2 comments
by gmoke - Feb 25
by Oui - Mar 261 comment
by Oui - Mar 259 comments
by Oui - Mar 244 comments
by Oui - Mar 246 comments
by Oui - Mar 23
by Oui - Mar 231 comment
by Oui - Mar 211 comment
by Oui - Mar 191 comment
by Oui - Mar 19
by Oui - Mar 18
by Oui - Mar 175 comments
by Oui - Mar 16
by Oui - Mar 165 comments
by Oui - Mar 1510 comments
by Oui - Mar 155 comments
by Oui - Mar 147 comments
by Oui - Mar 1312 comments
by Oui - Mar 12
by Oui - Mar 1113 comments