Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
What if there is a county in Scotland that wants to hold an independence (from Scotland) vote? Etc.

Basic question is how often and in what circumstances an organization unit can review whether it wants to be part of the next higher level. Should households be able to get independence from neighborhoods? Neighborhoods from towns? Towns from counties? Counties from states? States from countries? Countries from federations?

by asdf on Fri Jun 17th, 2022 at 03:41:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]
If it is not possible for a region to assert sovereignty, how is it that over 200 independent nations have evolved on this planet? Historically sovereignty often had to be asserted militarily in order to be successful. Latterly it has been sufficient for significant civil resistance or economic cost to be sufficient for a ruling state to cede sovereignty over another region, a process Putin is currently trying to reverse.

Historically, Scotland and England were united by the 1707 act of Union. It would be a relatively simple legal process to repeal that act. The question of how the two states would divide common assets, liabilities, and manage ongoing relations is the hard part.

Index of Frank's Diaries

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Sat Jun 18th, 2022 at 10:43:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It depends on whether a system allows a unilateral separation. Can the Act of Union be repealed by Scotland without England's cooperation?

The EU allows it, although Brexit might trigger some eventual hardening of the withdrawal rules. I think the EU is an outlier among geopolitical arrangements, though.

by asdf on Sat Jun 18th, 2022 at 05:40:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Latterly it has been sufficient for significant civil resistance or economic cost to be sufficient for a ruling state to cede sovereignty over another region, a process Putin is currently trying to reverse.
Ukraine was kind of the opposite, no? With Yeltsin being the leading force of the breakup so he could get rid of Gorbachev.
Actually I don't think we can claim that there is a historic trend toward civil resistance leading to a ruling state ceding sovereignty. In the context of a rising USSR and the US still not being the undisputed hegemon of the western world? Sure I can see this happening. But that was India and Suez. Then came Algeria and Vietnam.

Irish unification doesn't seem that unlikely. It would be less of a headache than the status quo for basically everyone, the US would probably support it for domestic reasons and the political tendency that favors it has historically been willing to endure quite a bit of pain.
But Scotland? Who is going to force the UK to release Scotland? The EU really isn't a serious political actor and even if it was, who really wants a second Irish land border situation, but worse? The US has no reason to care. I guess Moscow would send sincere well wishes, but that and eight quid will buy you haggis. So my guess is still: The SNP will demand a referendum, the Tories will say no and that's that for the foreseeable future.

by generic on Sun Jun 19th, 2022 at 11:56:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Other issues for Scottish independence are the management of UK military infrastructure in Scotland, and the overall economic picture.

Irish unification is easy in comparison.

If the voters carefully consider the options (unlikely given recent voting history everywhere on the Earth), they would insist that the SNP provide an honest and comprehensive explanation about how things will work out. Just like there wasn't for Brexit.

My view is that Scotland is stuck in England for the duration. Although maybe the US would accept a petition for Scottish statehood!

by asdf on Sun Jun 19th, 2022 at 02:44:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series