This graph is simply bullshit, as it doesn't account for land area. It does not support the charge of "Green fake news."

Simplifying a complex energy situation doesn't help, especially if one doesn't know what one is writing about.

The same goes for your comment on the Economist post where they parrot the gas industry who says they can double German gas production in 18-24 months. Your comment was "stupidity to the nth degree" or something inane. You know nothing about the vast increase in earthquakes in western Niedersachsen, where the fracking has plummeted property values. You know nothing about how increased gas use will not stop germany's use of coal, nor about how it would affect germany's long term climate goals.

But mostly you don't know anything about the german push to accelerate the change to a hydrogen economy, and how capital needs to b e directed in that direction, in order to stave off the worst effects of the climate emergency.

You should be writing about how most countries in northern and western Europe are already steadily accelerating the transition from more than two centuries of fossil fuels poisoning society to the most rapid social experiment ever undertaken, the switch to a hydrogen economy.

"Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin