The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
"On Wednesday, the EU took the unprecedented step of ending a long-held ban on using resources from its central budget to provide cash to the arms industry."Kleptocratisch geboefte. [_link]— Fernand Keuleneer (@FKeuleneer) May 4, 2023
"On Wednesday, the EU took the unprecedented step of ending a long-held ban on using resources from its central budget to provide cash to the arms industry."Kleptocratisch geboefte. [_link]
EU pledges over $1 billion to refresh its arms factories for Ukraine | Defense News | 'Sapere aude'
Funding the EU's security, defence, and border policies, 2021-2027 At time time of writing, a war is being waged in Ukraine following an illegal invasion by Russian troops in February 2022. In response to this war, European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, announced that the EU would, for the first time ever, finance the purchase and delivery of weapons to a country under attack. EC vice president and high representative for foreign affairs and security policy, Josep Borrell, confirmed that lethal weapons would be sent to the war zone, funded by the European Peace Facility, saying that `another taboo has fallen... that the European Union was not providing arms in a war'. The European Peace Facility is but one of the EU's array of budgetary instruments that form part of the 2021-27 Multi-annual Financial Framework (MFF), under which an unprecedented amount of money has been earmarked for security and defence purposes. Other instruments with specific budget lines for security, defence and military equipment include the Internal Security Fund (ISF), the Integrated Border Management Fund (IBMF), the Asylum and Migration Fund (AMF), the Security Research Programme and the European Defence Fund (EDF), among others. This research discusses the objectives and functioning of each of these instruments, while also interrogating the larger political picture regarding what their approval means for the EU as a whole. [...] The ultimate aim of all these movements is a more just, peaceful world - one that eliminates the historic systems of social and economic inequality that have for so long divided people and societies, as well as the systems of surveillance, coercion and exclusion that underpin these systems. Governments have not given a warm reception to this message. On the contrary, by and large they continue to press ahead with failed models of security that have done so much harm, propelled by economic interests that see `solutions' for security problems in new technologies of surveillance and coercion. The new seven-year security budgets approved by the European Union (EU) in early 2021- the subject of this report - provide a clear example of this woeful tendency. A massive increase in security spending over the next seven years - to the tune of tens of billions of euros - is set to further reinforce `Fortress Europe', bolster the technologies and powers available to police forces, and provide enormous sums for the development of new military equipment and the deployment of military operations overseas. This report is intended as a guide for campaigners, journalists, researchers and others who wish to understand how these budgets work, with the aim of spurring critical engagement with the projects and activities the EU currently funds, as well as informing subsequent negotiations on the next round of EU security spending, due to start in 2025.
At time time of writing, a war is being waged in Ukraine following an illegal invasion by Russian troops in February 2022. In response to this war, European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, announced that the EU would, for the first time ever, finance the purchase and delivery of weapons to a country under attack. EC vice president and high representative for foreign affairs and security policy, Josep Borrell, confirmed that lethal weapons would be sent to the war zone, funded by the European Peace Facility, saying that `another taboo has fallen... that the European Union was not providing arms in a war'.
The European Peace Facility is but one of the EU's array of budgetary instruments that form part of the 2021-27 Multi-annual Financial Framework (MFF), under which an unprecedented amount of money has been earmarked for security and defence purposes. Other instruments with specific budget lines for security, defence and military equipment include the Internal Security Fund (ISF), the Integrated Border Management Fund (IBMF), the Asylum and Migration Fund (AMF), the Security Research Programme and the European Defence Fund (EDF), among others. This research discusses the objectives and functioning of each of these instruments, while also interrogating the larger political picture regarding what their approval means for the EU as a whole.
[...]
The ultimate aim of all these movements is a more just, peaceful world - one that eliminates the historic systems of social and economic inequality that have for so long divided people and societies, as well as the systems of surveillance, coercion and exclusion that underpin these systems. Governments have not given a warm reception to this message. On the contrary, by and large they continue to press ahead with failed models of security that have done so much harm, propelled by economic interests that see `solutions' for security problems in new technologies of surveillance and coercion.
The new seven-year security budgets approved by the European Union (EU) in early 2021- the subject of this report - provide a clear example of this woeful tendency. A massive increase in security spending over the next seven years - to the tune of tens of billions of euros - is set to further reinforce `Fortress Europe', bolster the technologies and powers available to police forces, and provide enormous sums for the development of new military equipment and the deployment of military operations overseas. This report is intended as a guide for campaigners, journalists, researchers and others who wish to understand how these budgets work, with the aim of spurring critical engagement with the projects and activities the EU currently funds, as well as informing subsequent negotiations on the next round of EU security spending, due to start in 2025.
In 1951, Robert Schuman saw Europe in big, when he initiated the European Coal and Steel Community. A precursurer to the EU today, it was the first time ever that six countries united to create a common market for coal and steel. #Archives30 #EUarchives pic.twitter.com/rAoeckYxwD— European Commission (@EU_Commission) August 6, 2018
In 1951, Robert Schuman saw Europe in big, when he initiated the European Coal and Steel Community. A precursurer to the EU today, it was the first time ever that six countries united to create a common market for coal and steel. #Archives30 #EUarchives pic.twitter.com/rAoeckYxwD
Troubling Times for Fortress Europa 'Sapere aude'
Rejecting Fortress Europe | Apr 23, 2023 | The European Union will not solve the problems of an aging and shrinking society by discouraging immigration. Creative legal migration policies are needed. Europe is getting older. It has fewer births and people are living longer. The EU's population will peak at 526 million, according to current projections by the 2040s, and then decline by nearly 30 million people by the end of the century. A third of Europeans will be over 65 by the 2050s, up from 20 percent today.
The European Union will not solve the problems of an aging and shrinking society by discouraging immigration. Creative legal migration policies are needed.
Europe is getting older. It has fewer births and people are living longer. The EU's population will peak at 526 million, according to current projections by the 2040s, and then decline by nearly 30 million people by the end of the century.
A third of Europeans will be over 65 by the 2050s, up from 20 percent today.
So what is the decision by EU Consilium and Parliament? Investment in more wars, reject peace. The secondary effects from 9/11 and the War on Terror by the Bush neocon clan from 2001-2009. Make NATO a tool of aggression ... 'Sapere aude'
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 3 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 2 2 comments
by gmoke - Nov 28
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 21 10 comments
by gmoke - Nov 12 6 comments
by Oui - Dec 8
by Oui - Dec 716 comments
by Oui - Dec 5
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 32 comments
by Oui - Dec 214 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 22 comments
by Oui - Dec 26 comments
by Oui - Dec 112 comments
by Oui - Dec 14 comments
by Oui - Nov 306 comments
by Oui - Nov 289 comments
by Oui - Nov 276 comments
by gmoke - Nov 26
by Oui - Nov 268 comments
by Oui - Nov 26
by Oui - Nov 2513 comments
by Oui - Nov 2318 comments
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 222 comments