The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
As part of our commitment to ensuring free, fair, safe, and secure elections in Pennsylvania, Secretary Schmidt visited all 67 counties to sit down with the dedicated election officials working day and night to make sure that when you show up to vote, your vote will be counted. pic.twitter.com/HBSAmDGDgU— PA Department of State (@PAStateDept) October 31, 2024
As part of our commitment to ensuring free, fair, safe, and secure elections in Pennsylvania, Secretary Schmidt visited all 67 counties to sit down with the dedicated election officials working day and night to make sure that when you show up to vote, your vote will be counted. pic.twitter.com/HBSAmDGDgU
Democracy a guarantee for FREE and FAIR voting ... not in USA 🇺🇸
GOP PA: "Your days are numbered BITCH!" 'Sapere aude'
Image credit geology.com
Understanding Pennsylvania's Early Vote | Booman23 | This year I am going to revert back to how I voted in 2016, in person on Election Day at that elementary school. Even though I'm tempted to vote early to help GOTV efforts, I like voting in person on Election Day and I especially like knowing my vote will be counted right away, and everyone will see it on their television screens on Election Night. I tell this story because it will help you understand the significance of this article in Politico. Trump lagging in early vote with seniors in Pennsylvania, a red flag for GOP The main theme of the article is about the early vote with Pennsylvanians over 65, and I'm not that old yet. But there are two things about the elder vote here that are encouraging to the Democrats. The first and most important is that several polls are showing Harris winning the elder vote, where Clinton and Biden lost it. The second is that pollsters are asking people they contact who have already cast a ballot who they voted for, and they're seeing an advantage for Harris here, too. This is positive news, but it's not why I'm writing this. [...] This is exactly what we expected to see, with the Republicans cannibalizing more of their Election Day vote than the Democrats. Now, put that together with the data on the elder vote, and the Democrats are feeling good. That's because "voters over the age of 65 have cast nearly half of the early ballots" and "registered Democrats account for about 58 percent of votes cast by seniors, compared to 35 percent for Republicans." Then there's survey data on the elder vote as a whole. The most recent Fox News poll of Pennsylvania has Trump "running 5 percentage points behind Harris among voters ages 65 and over." That's troubling for the Republicans because elders have the highest percentage turnout of any demographic, and 53 percent of them voted for Trump last time in a losing effort.
This year I am going to revert back to how I voted in 2016, in person on Election Day at that elementary school. Even though I'm tempted to vote early to help GOTV efforts, I like voting in person on Election Day and I especially like knowing my vote will be counted right away, and everyone will see it on their television screens on Election Night.
I tell this story because it will help you understand the significance of this article in Politico.
The main theme of the article is about the early vote with Pennsylvanians over 65, and I'm not that old yet. But there are two things about the elder vote here that are encouraging to the Democrats. The first and most important is that several polls are showing Harris winning the elder vote, where Clinton and Biden lost it. The second is that pollsters are asking people they contact who have already cast a ballot who they voted for, and they're seeing an advantage for Harris here, too.
This is positive news, but it's not why I'm writing this.
[...]
This is exactly what we expected to see, with the Republicans cannibalizing more of their Election Day vote than the Democrats. Now, put that together with the data on the elder vote, and the Democrats are feeling good. That's because "voters over the age of 65 have cast nearly half of the early ballots" and "registered Democrats account for about 58 percent of votes cast by seniors, compared to 35 percent for Republicans."
Then there's survey data on the elder vote as a whole. The most recent Fox News poll of Pennsylvania has Trump "running 5 percentage points behind Harris among voters ages 65 and over." That's troubling for the Republicans because elders have the highest percentage turnout of any demographic, and 53 percent of them voted for Trump last time in a losing effort.
Trump and Harris are both a normal polling error away from a blowout | ABC News | This raises two questions for 2024: First, what would happen if the polls are off again? And second, how likely is it that the polls will be off by as much as they were in 2016 or 2020? Either Trump or Harris could win comfortably In 2020, polls overestimated Biden's margin over Trump by about 4 percentage points in competitive states. As of Oct. 30 at 11:30 a.m. Eastern, the margin between Vice President Kamala Harris and Trump in 538's polling averages is smaller than 4 points in seven states: the familiar septet of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. That means that, if the polling error from 2020 repeats itself, Trump would win all seven swing states and 312 Electoral College votes.
This raises two questions for 2024: First, what would happen if the polls are off again? And second, how likely is it that the polls will be off by as much as they were in 2016 or 2020?
Either Trump or Harris could win comfortably
In 2020, polls overestimated Biden's margin over Trump by about 4 percentage points in competitive states. As of Oct. 30 at 11:30 a.m. Eastern, the margin between Vice President Kamala Harris and Trump in 538's polling averages is smaller than 4 points in seven states: the familiar septet of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. That means that, if the polling error from 2020 repeats itself, Trump would win all seven swing states and 312 Electoral College votes.
Nate Silver @NateSilver538 12h There are some confounders here, but the inflation thing is actually statistically significant! Each additional $100 of inflation in a state since January 2021 predicts a further 1.6 swing against Harris in our polling average vs. the Biden-Trump margin in 2020.
There are some confounders here, but the inflation thing is actually statistically significant! Each additional $100 of inflation in a state since January 2021 predicts a further 1.6 swing against Harris in our polling average vs. the Biden-Trump margin in 2020.
Grabbing headlines
In 2020, the polls showed Biden with the incredible lead in the Rust Belt states that insured a landslide victory. The only thing counteracting that was the Selzer poll, which should have showed Iowa maybe Trump +1 or two or maybe even Biden plus one but instead showed Trump +8. This threw Cold water on the entire idea that Biden was going to win in a massive landslide. Which turned out to be true. He barely won.
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 3
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 2 2 comments
by gmoke - Nov 28
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 21 10 comments
by gmoke - Nov 12 6 comments
by gmoke - Nov 8
by Oui - Dec 23 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 22 comments
by Oui - Dec 26 comments
by Oui - Dec 111 comments
by Oui - Dec 13 comments
by Oui - Nov 301 comment
by Oui - Nov 289 comments
by Oui - Nov 276 comments
by gmoke - Nov 26
by Oui - Nov 268 comments
by Oui - Nov 26
by Oui - Nov 2513 comments
by Oui - Nov 2318 comments
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 222 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 2110 comments
by Oui - Nov 214 comments
by Oui - Nov 2117 comments