Last night, while searching for the CNN recording, I heard some YouTube reactionary attribute that "big lie" bromide to Hitler.

Then, I learned yer MLB boy poll-of-polls statistician Nate Silver desperately needs help validating his post-2016 uhh calculations. He's a slow learner.

According to Sabby Sabs

@2:23:56: Remember, Nate Silver said, if she didn't get the +14 coming out of that convention like Obama, he was going to have to make adjustments with his predictions.

Now, I don't know what kinda of scientists encourage students to substitute an orange toss from 16 years ago for a coin toss today, but Sabatini further refers to "Presidential Model" notes published beyond the Silver Bulletin subscriber pay-wall.
national average "convention bounce adjustment"?

Apparently, he hadn't figured on "high-quality" state polls spoiling the model's "electoral bias" and "house bias" co-efficients... until last night. Now, he's preparing to concede that Kamala?! might "win" the popular vote but "lose" the electors, although that's not his substack front page story.