The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
I have a feeling that London may be about to nose out Paris for the 2012 summer games.
This is what I have picked up over the last couple of days.
We'll see... In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
The mood in Madrid
The mood in Paris
The mood in New York In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/other_sports/olympics_2012/4646759.stm
"Paris was upset on Monday after the Stade de France stadium, centrepiece of the Paris bid, was criticised at a London 2012 briefing.
Sydney 2000 organising chief Jim Sloman and architect Rod Sheard suggested the venue was not ideally suited to stage Olympic athletic events.
Paris will not lodge an official complaint, but the episode serves as a reminder of the strict rules set down by the International Olympic Commission's ethics commission, which state bid teams are not allowed to criticise rival cities." "Once in awhile we get shown the light, in the strangest of places, if we look at it right" - Hunter/Garcia
The popular opinion here is that the French will likely win, but that London 'deserves' to.
As an aside, is the work 'NO' the first thing that anyone else sees when they see the Moscow logo? It's a nice logo, and I see how they were trying to use the Kremlin imagery (that's where that toiwer is), but they don't seem to have focus-group'ed it in English-language markets.
Also, are the existing sports facilities adequate? I went to Wembley in the early 90's and concluded that if it were in the US it would have been dynamited years earlier. Even my college team had a nicer stadium.
As for places like the Oval, again ancient ramshackle facilities with miserable sightlines (at least from where I sat). Didn't ever enter Lords but sure looked old and "full of tradition" from the 2nd level of the bus. If this is what London is basing their bid on........
Not that we'd spend the money to fight the crowds half way around the world to watch track and field anyway.
It's also a few billion pounds over budget and will end up a year or two late, but that's to be expected with English construction.
Lords' isn't that bad nowadays, but seeing as it's going to be used for Archery, I'm not all that worried about it. Beach Volleyball is going to be in horseguards, which, while pretty sacreligious, is nothing compared to having it in Tian'an'men Square (like they're planning for in Beijing).
As for the rest, I'm nto sure where they're building them. I remember hearing about plans to raize the hundred football pitches of Dalston to build an Olympic village, and to redevelop parts of the East End for it as well. However, in order for that area to be enev renotely accessible, they need Crossrail - which ain't happening for a long time.
The Olympic area will be served by a high speed link from Stratford. That station will be on the new high speed channel tunnel link that terminates at Kings Cross and extra link trains will be run along that line. Crossrail may well go ahead for completion by 2012 if the bid is successful but Stratford is also served by the Jubilee Line extension which gets to central London in about 15 minutes and also the Docklands light railway which links to London City airport. Transport is therefore probably as easy as Paris even thought Paris has a more compact city centre bid.
Of the bidders, Moscow and New York are probably likely to go out first. Moscow has image and security problems. New York's bid should have been ruled out according to the rules because of the loss of the original stadium site. Madrid is likely to go out in the third round - although it has some positive aspects, its major disadvantage is that Spain had the Barcelona games fairly recently. London and Paris will probably be in the last run-off. Their bids are thought to be fairly evenly balanced with Paris having existing builds and more hotel rooms available at the time, London's bid has greater legacy (the main site will be used for a sports academy with the main stadium "shrinking" in capacity for ordinary meets) and regenerates a far bigger area than the Paris bid.
The final vote is thought to be so tight that indescrete remarks from Chirac about Finnish food might swing the balance. If London did get it, it would at least mean that there will be more time to prepare than the last time when there were less than three years after London bailed out the Olympics with a venue for 1948 when no-one else was willing or capable to. It will also bring the Olympics back to the home of the modern Olympics (read the history and where de Coubertain got the idea)
If the Paris bid does not win, I'll be mildly disappointed but I certainly won't be demoralized nor will I be upset by any tasteless gloating on the part of Mr. Blair or anyone else.
I'm more concerned by how much people seem to have riding on this to cheer up. It's just a sporting event and it won't, or shouldn't change our lives.
If just part of the money spent on campaigning, planning, and finally building lavish sports complexes, etc, were spread around on amateur sports facilities all over the countries concerned, that would do a lot more for sport, and public health, and society in general, than the great four-yearly dope-fest on TV that the Olympics have become.
Maybe the winter Olympics could be held in Switzerland or Japan or Colorado. Two sites, one for the summer and one for the winter.
Paris 1924 Last Olympic Games
~~~
Singapore Malaysia today
1980 - Moscow ◊ 1984 - Los Angeles ◊ 1988 - Seoul ◊ 1992 - Barcelona ◊ 1996 - Atlanta ◊ 2000 - Sydney ◊ 2004 - Athens ◊ 2008 - Beijing ◊ 2012 - ... 50 votes needed
PS Jerome, I hope you don't mind me jumping the gun ahead of the decision proces today within the IOC.
USA WELCOME: Make Yourself Known @BooMan Tribune and add some cheers! Amnesia and Gaza Genocide
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/other_sports/olympics_2012/4654201.stm
They are really trying to create the perspective of a likely London win. I'll be curious to see them explain after a (hoped for) Paris win that the Paris bid was really superior, no question about it, and that it was already a miracle that they got so close... I don't even want to imagine the crowing if they win! In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
Paris - London
Olympics countdown diary ◊ by Jerome a Paris Amnesia and Gaza Genocide
Could the European Tribune timestamp be changed to CET? *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
(This California software is good! ;-) ) *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
We can still have dinner in Paris during the Olympics!
Mind you, if any of your group have adverse reactions to beans, one might want to avoid enclosed spaces.
Now Chirac will have to eat his haggis.
The UK has had zilch Olympic games since 1948!
It should have been Paris. Can I go back and change my vote now? :-)
If France had won at last the games wouldn't have gone to a country presently led by a war criminal. Can anyone say Berlin?
London - Trafalgar Square Today
London 1948 Last Olympic Games Women Athletics - Fanny Blankers-Koen 3x Gold Mother and housewife - the Flying Dutch Woman
1980 - Moscow ◊ 1984 - Los Angeles ◊ 1988 - Seoul ◊ 1992 - Barcelona ◊ 1996 - Atlanta ◊ 2000 - Sydney ◊ 2004 - Athens ◊ 2008 - Beijing ◊ 2012 - London!
PS Difference was 4 votes: Madrid votes to London.
Probably not. Who reads Greek newspapers?
London Games would 'inspire athletes of tomorrow'
Lord Sebastian Coe
COE ASKS FOR BOLD DECISION
Sebastian Coe has launched a passionate and inspirational plea to the International Olympic Committee to deliver the 2012 Games to London.
The bid chairman's closing speech told the IOC members they had the opportunity to be "bold" and vote for London and take the Olympic movement forward - or by implication stand still and vote for a less ambitious Games.
Coe appealed "on behalf of the youth of today" and explained how he had been inspired to become an athlete as a 12-year-old by watching the 1968 Mexico Olympics on a black and white television.
[...]
At least we can rest assured that this was a sporting decision entirely free of politics.
Eh?
A la prochaine? Pogo: We have met the enemy, and he is us.
I see that the Olympic Games are a way to sell huge infrastructure investments, and that some of that investment is of general benefit. But much of the megabucks thrown around goes to the same old bunch of fat cat usual suspects, and the curmudgeon in me doesn't like that, and doesn't like the fact that all this sports nonsense has to be used as the cover for urban renewal.
It's all about money, it's all about politics, and the people are more or less innocent bystanders. (Spectators, one might say.) So that's why I said at the start of this conversation that the optics are bad. The Games are not 'awarded' to the people of the UK or of London, whatever the rhetoric may say; they are awarded to the government.
I'm all in favour of urban renewal, but I'm not in favour of a gesture that apparently puts the stamp of approval on a government that chose to join in with an illegal invasion and occupation against the wishes of the UN Security Council.
Sorry to rain on the parade. Pogo: We have met the enemy, and he is us.
The Olympic village will be used for social housing afterwards and will use the improved road and rail infrastructure (a lot would have been in place anyway but there are some addtional links as a result of the games). A lot of the site is a highly polluted disused industrial site at the moment so much will be spent on relaiming the land. Some has already been utilised for leisure land in the "Lea Valley Regional Park" but this will be further landscaped with river improvements and new landscaping after some of the temporary buildings have gone.
The improved infrastructure is part of the "legacy" that was an important aspect of the bid. The intention is that the Olympics will be linked in to sports for young people to provide the "next generation" who will be competing in 2012 and beyond. In sporting terms a proper Olympic standard swimming pool in the East of London is significant as there are very few in the capital (Crystal Palace being the other big one).
The Games are intended to pay their own running costs but the capital works are budgetted to cost and extra £2.2 billion. Much of this is to be funded from National Lottery income with addtional amounts coming from a £20 per year precept on the local property taxes accross London.
God help us all.
The idea of comparing Blair to Hitler says more about you than it does anything about Blair.
This is one of those kind of sites.
I actually want continental Europe to be competitive!
However, one look at your blog, and I have to think there's a certain amount of snark in that I actually want continental Europe to be competitive!
I have seen your site and was planning to invite you around, even though your opinions certainly do not fall in the mainstream of this site. But we're mostly reasonable people and I hope we can have some lively and open debate if you stick around! In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
Best of luck on your site.
Just sayin' :-)
As one who has made some of the comments you refer to, I think you make an excellent point here.
The Olympic award should not be seen in the narrow terms of Iraq, or Africa, or anything else, and East End urban renewal has to be a good thing, overall.
Unfortunately, I fear that the award will be seen in the distorted ways we've discussed. Perception vs. reality, and all that.
Thanks for weighing in. Pogo: We have met the enemy, and he is us.
Here's her conclusion:
The really important thing, however, is to keep this victory for London in proper perspective. We have had far too much sneering at the continentals lately, including some from a labour movement that ought to know better. Despite President Chirac's rude remarks about our food (can we honestly say he is wrong?), the French are our natural allies, as are the Germans and Spanish, and our destinies are linked. We need deals on the EU, on its budget, on aid and trade. We need to work more closely, not least in the next few days in Scotland, where, on almost every issue from global warming to aid for Africa, the real foes are the Americans. Tempting though it may be for some to ratchet up the war with the French, it is not in our interests to do so unless we want to become even more dependent on the United States, jumping whenever George Bush demands we jump, yet expecting nothing in return. So no triumphalism: let Tony Blair be generous and open-handed in private, whatever Chirac has said about him and the British, and move swiftly on to rather more important matters such as climate change, which has the power to flood our buzzing, multi-ethnic London and to starve Paris of water. That's where the real passion and argument should be directed, not - sweet though this victory is - at the less significant question of who gets to shuttle the archers and boxers round from stadium to hotel in seven years' time.
Tempting though it may be for some to ratchet up the war with the French, it is not in our interests to do so unless we want to become even more dependent on the United States, jumping whenever George Bush demands we jump, yet expecting nothing in return.
So no triumphalism: let Tony Blair be generous and open-handed in private, whatever Chirac has said about him and the British, and move swiftly on to rather more important matters such as climate change, which has the power to flood our buzzing, multi-ethnic London and to starve Paris of water. That's where the real passion and argument should be directed, not - sweet though this victory is - at the less significant question of who gets to shuttle the archers and boxers round from stadium to hotel in seven years' time.
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 18 16 comments
by gmoke - Jan 13 9 comments
by gmoke - Dec 22
by Oui - Feb 6
by Oui - Feb 5
by Oui - Feb 52 comments
by Oui - Feb 4
by Oui - Feb 3
by Oui - Feb 1
by Oui - Jan 31
by Oui - Jan 30
by Oui - Jan 29
by Oui - Jan 28
by Oui - Jan 281 comment
by gmoke - Jan 27
by Oui - Jan 27
by Oui - Jan 26