Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.

Did you already know about the War Scare of 1948?

But of course, I was told of it at my mother's knee   0 votes - 0 %
I've been aware of it most of my adult life as a fact of US history   1 vote - 9 %
Sorta heard about it somewhere but never knew what it meant   2 votes - 18 %
News to me, but hardly a surprise   7 votes - 63 %
I'm shocked, I tell you -- shocked!   1 vote - 9 %
 
11 Total Votes
Display:
My father was a naval communications officer who served on the Admiral's flagship in the Pacific fleet during WWII, and was a historian and teacher in civilian life. We discussed the history of the cold war in general terms, and he told me that in his opinion the justification for it was shaky and open to historical doubt. In his younger years he was deeply afraid of the possibility of the loss of civil liberties in the United States as a result of the growth of a power center composed of the "defense" department and the industries that fed it- or is it the other way around?

In later years his views became more conventional for an ex-naval officer, but by that time it was too late--he had already infected me with the habit of independent thought.

Thanks, dad.

Capitalism searches out the darkest corners of human potential, and mainlines them.

by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Mon Mar 3rd, 2008 at 02:29:42 AM EST
Great diary to stir up old pots. On a cold and rainy day, I will ramble some, just for fun.

one of the things historians most often fail to discuss -- are the precise means by which the dominant class and those who serve it go about accomplishing their goals in politics.

It's not hard to see why.
The lives and activities of the "dominant class" are almost all shrouded in secrecy, - their homes, hobbies, recreational facilities and clubs, their phone numbers, ---and they react with angry defensiveness to those who would dig too deep. Trouble there.
Tis is even more apparent in France than in the United States.

Historians tend to fall into two categories- the academic historians and the writers of trade literature, of all stripes. The academicians often produce tomes to be used as texts, so need to tow the line -for them the term "controversial historian" is an oxymoron. Controversy in the typical American history classroom is anathema. If you want to remain publishable or get tenured, -or sell your text book- you're careful. I suspect this applies to European universities as well. After all, it's the dominant class who endow these places-or dominate them. Also, there's a distinct aroma of  authoritarian worship about many academicians, and the peer pressure from these guys can be extreme on any rebellious spirit, as my father discovered to his dismay.  

I praise the gods for people like Howard Zinn , Noam Chomsky, Peter Linebaugh, Markus Rediker, Chalmers Johnson, but note that though they all have some respect in the academic community- particularly outside the US- they write things that appeal significantly to the trade -- that is to say, the over-the-counter book sales business.

That said, an awful lot of human activities can be massaged into a conspiracy narrative, however, and most of them are fancifully false.
I think this human tendency has a number of precursors- the love of a good story, when reality offers a not-as-good narrative, the presence of real paranoid tendencies, and the consequent clumping together of those with this mind-set, and above all, anger.  Feelings of powerlessness, anomie, the certain knowledge that the "dominant class" has and will again screw you at the first opportunity-- anger is a reasonable reaction.
But if the story does not represent the real course of events, then decisions taken based on it will likely be poor ones. And narratives with cartoon-simple bad guys-good guys seem to draw out the dingbats- write one, even if it's true, and the round-eyed ones flock to it. It makes one reluctant to open those doors.

How then can one do the separation -of fantasy from reality?
A couple thoughts.
The techniques of reasoned analysis are not taught much these days. Analysis is subversive.
Believe it or not, the criminology area of most good sociology departments offer some treasures, as well as some rhetoric and journalism classes.
life teaches one to assemble puzzles pretty well, to a fair degree, or nothing we do would work.

Most of what could be onspiracies sink on the rocks of complexity. The whole thing is just too unwieldy to be managed without discovery, and discovery would carry consequences that outweigh the payoff. Bush is, of course, nuts, and hubris is the hallmark of today's Empire. Hm.
Also, the limits to risk need to be modified to include incredibly improved media control. Discovery today is often like a stone falling into a pond- with hardly a ripple. Witness Siebel Edmonds. Or the Downing Street Memo, though it got some press in the UK.

For me, one important part is knowing when to apply old Occam's Razor-- and when not to.
It's always a good idea to search out one's hidden assumptions, and eliminate those that just aren't germane, but the simplest explanation is not always the right one.
I think Occam must have occasionally cut off some useful parts while shaving. People just aint simple.

The puzzle of the failure of the Democratic congress is a great one. When it is finally known -if it ever is- it will likely be part history, part technothriller, and part plain megalomaniac nuttiness. Really good true story there, I think.

Capitalism searches out the darkest corners of human potential, and mainlines them.

by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Tue Mar 4th, 2008 at 03:54:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
good stuff, de.

has anyone discovered collusion in russia between military-industrial biz and government to distort facts too, or is it just the westTM?
back in the 40's, or now?

on a paranoid day, i see visions of all the death-tycoons on both sides agreeing to whip up fear for mutual profit.

i wonder if that's happening now...

'hey vlad, we're gonna put more bases around you, that should boost you guys' bizniz, now why don't you make some noise about training missiles on yurp, and how you're going to plough more roubles into your war machinery.'

'that should do the trick george,will do. brilliant!, see ya at g8 for drinks and golf. oh, and thanks for saying you saw my soul, the russian church love me now'.

'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Mon Mar 3rd, 2008 at 05:45:55 AM EST
on a paranoid day, i see visions of all the death-tycoons on both sides agreeing to whip up fear for mutual profit.

I believe that "Kinky Sex Makes the World Go 'Round" is the authorative reference on that.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Mon Mar 3rd, 2008 at 05:49:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
lol

'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Mon Mar 3rd, 2008 at 06:08:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Swiss newspaper "Le Temps" reports about a conference in Geneva on 9/11 questions:

La version américaine sur le 11 septembre continue de susciter la méfiance
(The American version of September 11 continues to raise suspicion)

The conference "The Oil Age Peak, 2001 September 11 and the War On Terror: What Links Them?" (approximate translation from here) is held at the "Forum Meyrin" center, inspired by the film "9/11: Press for Truth" shown in Switzerland at the end of January. 9/11 doubts were raised recently by Japanese and European parliamentarians.

Googling up for 9/11 at Google News gives the following two interesting stories:

'Official Conspiracy Theory' Believed Only by 'Hypocrites and Fools'

More evidence of Pre-9/11 Inside Trading: Follow the Money? God forbid

by das monde on Mon Mar 3rd, 2008 at 09:32:36 PM EST
If you don't laugh, a possible basis of the modern conspiracy pyramid:

"In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell

The year is 1913, Woodrow Wilson is president, and powerful banking interests, who have been trying for year, finally achieved their long term goal, of silently taking control of the American government.

The first thing the did to accomplish their take over was convince secretary of state, Flan Denox, to lie to the American people, and tell them that the 16th amendment [Income Tax Amendment] had been legally ratified by the states when it was not. The bankers knew that this tax would ultimately end up in their pockets.

Because of this fraud the American people were led to believe there was a tax on their labor. Congress and the President ARE completely aware of this fraud and it was cited in a recent court case:

"If you... examined [the 16th amendment] carefully, you would find that a sufficient number of states ratified that amendment." - U.S.District Court Judge, James C. Fox, 2003

That very same year [1913] the bankers committed their second, and by far most diabolical fraud ever perpetrated on the American people, by bribing senators to pass the Federal Reserve Act, without the required Constitutional amendment. They did this during Christmas vacation, when many senators where home celebrating Christmas with their families.

And that is how the unconstitutional Federal Reserve Act came into being. They were very clever, and understood that who ever issued the money for America controlled the government.

"Give me control of a nations money supply, and I care not who makes its laws." - Mayer Rothschild, Private Banker

President Wilson, who signed the Federal Reserve Act later said in regret:

"I'm a most unhappy man; I have unwittingly ruined my country a great industrial nation is now controlled by a system of credit. We are no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinions and duress of a small group of dominant men." - Woodrow Wilson, 1919

How did America transform from being a truly free country with a servant government where our individual rights are protected by our Constitution, to being a country that talked about being free but really wasn't?

The change started when the Federal Reserve came into existence, and America adopted one of the major planks of the Communist Manifesto by creating for America this central bank.

The very same people that back the Federal Reserve System also back the graduated income tax, a second plank from the Communist Manifesto.

And now our Congress so dominated by the banks, is helping them entrap people even further by passing new Bankruptcy Laws making it more difficult for the people to declare bankruptcy and get a fresh start.

"Who controls money controls the world." - Henry Kissinger, Council of Foreign Relations

These are starting theses from Aaron Russo's film America: Freedom to Fascism (transcribed from here).

Check also Peter Joseph's movie Zeitgeist.

by das monde on Tue Mar 4th, 2008 at 12:36:24 AM EST
Display:

Occasional Series