The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
As a side note, I think the inherent differences between common law and civil law systems (which were never identified and addressed when Maastricht was being hammered out) provided much of the grist for the "We have to take control back from the Brussels bureaucrats" elements of the Brexit campaign.
At a grass roots Tory membership level, Trump's endorsement enhances his prestige as a global player and plays into the Tory conceit of being very important on the world stage. Many of them like Trump anyway,and share his attitudes to the EU.
The DUPes are allowed to make a lot of noise, but how much of their support is solid?
Their support is solid enough amongst their core fundamentalist protestant base, but that only amounts to 20-30% of the electorate. Most of them actually quite dislike and distrust the English, but know that their diminishing hegemony is based on the "English Backstop" made up of guarantees of being part of the UK and in receipt of £10 Billion p.a. in subsidies. They know the Republic of Ireland couldn't afford such largesse, and, in any case, would have different priorities in spending what subsidies it could afford.
But the elephant in the room is the long term decline and systematic underdevelopment of the N. Ireland economy which has made those subsidies necessary in the first place. From having a GDP/Capita of about twice that of the Republic on independence in 1922, that ratio has now been reversed to being half that of the Republic. If re-unified now, Northern Ireland would be a proportionately larger drag on the all Ireland economy than the former GDR is on Germany.
In principle, however, absent civil unrest, there is no reason why N. Ireland should be any less productive than the Republic if run on similar lines within the EU. The problem is this could take 30+ years to achieve - see continuing underperformance and de-population of the former East Germany within Germany - and there is no way the Republic could afford that under-performance in the meantime, especially with changes in global corporate taxation rules in the offing.
So the DUP support base is stuck in something of a time warp, economically, politically, and socially, with no one really wanting them or being able to afford them, and with their traditional strategy of just saying no to everyone losing its efficacy. The EU/Ireland has steadfastly ignored their objections to the backstop and I suspect Boris Johnson will probably end up doing so too. They will then become a very nasty minority to have to deal with in N. Ireland, Ireland, the UK and, by association, in the EU.
Health Disparities at the Intersection of Disability and Gender Identity
"research" into disparity of medical outcomes ultimately correlated to earnings and "unsupportive family networks," which legislation cannot remedy
Standards of Care for the Health of Transsexual, Transgender, and Gender Nonconforming People
clinical treatment of (alleged, as above) mental disability and controversial nomenclature
Given these examples, is it reasonable to suppose that one's "psychosocial" satisfaction with gender-affirmation or sex re-assignment would be identical to one's political expectations, but for "the visceral fear/disgust" expressed by psychopaths who are committed to sex discrimination in any case?
Who is using transgender political agitation to "whittl[e] minority rights generally"? Step back from hyperbole induced histrionics in media commentaries on the occasion of 2019 Pride month. Prohibition of sex discrimination (all of its instant permutations, including "gender" perception) in legislation and, most important, case law actually is not excluding transgender persons. Proceeding from a very important series of categorical ("protected class") opinions (beginning with Perry v. Schwartzenegger and culminating in Hollingsworth v. Perry) differential application of any state or federal law is impermissible. Of course, that doesn't immediately guarantee someone won't try. As they will every day, every year somewhere or another to some other representative member of a "protected class".
Iowa Sued Over Ban on Medicaid Funds for Sex-Change Surgery
Two transgender Iowans and a gay rights group backed by the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit Friday challenging the constitutionality of a new state law barring Medicaid coverage for sex-reassignment surgeries.
The law, passed on the final day of the Iowa Legislature's session and tacked on to a 108-page appropriation bill, was in response to a unanimous March 8 ruling from the Iowa Supreme Court striking down a state Department of Human Services rule excluding sex-reassignment surgeries from Medicaid coverage. The state's high court said the rule violated the Iowa Civil Rights Act, which includes gender identity among the protected characteristics.
"When Congress prohibited sex discrimination, it did so according to the plain meaning of the term, and we are making our regulations conform," said Roger Severino, director of the department's Office for Civil Rights.
I could argue that over the last four decades LGBQT have fomented more political divisions (by definition) in the USA than have "right-wing" reactionaries, wherever they may be found embedded in public offices including but not limited to ecumenical agents directed and financed by secular institutions. LGBQT activists have readily adopted specious argument which belie historical and concurrent civil rights legislation, litigation, and enforcement authority from the last century. The political agenda of this cohort is approaching the limit of grievances by its own designs on legitimacy. Competing interest in enforcement --those "wedge issues" inherent to sexual orientation-- within the ranks is illustrated in ideological disarray as well the prompt for discussion, "The lack of dedicated LGBTQ media is a disaster" (Bacharach, above).
I've thought about it --false dichotomies and "intersectional" calculus promoted by "the false left"-- a lot over forty years. I say that as one "in it but not of it", one who has been and remains an ally of "minorities" struggling to secure equal protection and enforcement of the laws of this nation while balancing "normative" shibboleths of "dignity" disposed to mere status quo ante victory; as one who has observed with dismay the degeneration of prescriptive action into revolving, rhetorical descriptions about "equality", "hate", and "empowerment" given by some figurehead of the day; as one who is reasonable suspicious of persuasion which advocates for primacy in peculiarity of suffering.
But for daily, conspicuous consumption of moral and industrial goods by "powerful" individuals, one might forget that we are all suffering at the hand of that nonpartisan minority. For rest of us our goal is to alleviate suffering regardless of hierarchy or condition of servitude, to commit our productive energy to positive reinforcement of institutional adaptation to diverse demands. Which means the majority of us need to acknowledge that barriers to achieving that goal lie not enumerating expressions of humanity by every conceivable ("demographic") characteristic --the infinitesimal "why" in or "how" of discriminatory affects; but in our failures wholly to affirm and demand from private- and public-sector agents of our governments the obligation to delivery essential utilities irrespective of the characteristics of any one.
As to speculation of a revival of "female homosexual" militancy, please note "news" so far removed from "solidarity" and "gender" coherence derived from "sexual revolution" as to be comical: LGBTQ Protest Under Fire from Zionists for Banning Pro-Israel Symbols
Dyke marches are a tradition in the U.S. that typically precede regular pride marches: they are distinguishable because they tend to engage in direct action, such as dropping banners and blocking traffic, and the participants typically hold more radical politics.
It is also obvious that the Boris Tories and the Farage Brutals are in a death match for the same group of voters and there really isn't room in UK politics with FPTP for two parties on the right. tbh, post-brexit I'm not sure either has a future
Any chance the two cut a survival deal? Provided, of course, they can overcome the trifling point that Frottage and Boor-Ass each has an ego with its own post code.
The eruption of naked privilege and grotesque hypocrisy has genuinely sickened many people. Their willingness to preside over the destruction of poor peoples' lives for lesser crimes than they themsleves committed has given a pause to many who would previously have considered them.
Then you're still a far more decent lot than we are. We've been fine for decades with scions of the Ueberklass getting away scot-free for behavior that puts the less-advantaged in prison for years.
And if I should chance to run over a cad,
I can pay for the damage if ever so bad.
So pleasant it is to have money, heigh ho!
So pleasant it is to have money.
by Bjinse - May 28, 195 comments
by Bjinse - May 28, 47 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 13 27 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 10 29 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 7 20 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 5 24 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 24 19 comments
by gmoke - Jun 3 2 comments
by Oui - Jun 3 13 comments
by IdiotSavant - May 29
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1327 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1029 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 720 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 524 comments
by Oui - Jun 313 comments
by gmoke - Jun 32 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 295 comments
by IdiotSavant - May 29
by Frank Schnittger - May 2724 comments
by Oui - May 271 comment
by Frank Schnittger - May 2512 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 2419 comments
by Oui - May 2339 comments
by Oui - May 2312 comments
by melo - May 239 comments
by ATinNM - May 2210 comments
by gmoke - May 17
by Frank Schnittger - May 1768 comments
by Oui - May 1542 comments