Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.

What Cocaine Says about Britain

by RogueTrooper Thu Nov 10th, 2005 at 11:30:43 AM EST

What cocaine says about you

A model is caught on camera snorting a line and is vilified; a would-be prime minister refuses to deny using it in the past - and nobody seems to care. Cocaine used to mean moral degeneracy or metropolitan indulgence. What on earth does it stand for now?

Intersting article about drug use in the UK.

Once upon a time Cocaine used to be up with Heroine in the pantheon of Big Bad Drugs.

We used to think we knew what cocaine meant - it meant a bad, dangerous habit, a short-circuit to pleasure that was indulged in by those on a fast track to ruin. Unless, of course, you indulged in it yourself, in which case you were able to keep your sordid little habit under control and besides, it wasn't sordid, on the venerable principle that an alcoholic is someone you don't like who drinks as much as you. It has, alone among the pharmacopoeia, the property of turning its users into hypocrites.

But the fuss, or rather, the non-fuss, about David Cameron's drug use has changed all that. Although it is perhaps too early to say whether Labour or even the Tories will decide to capitalise on his near-admittance of cocaine use before becoming an MP (and there's a sentence that I could never have imagined writing, even six months ago), it seems at the moment as if he is going to get away with it.

Not anymore. However, that said Britain's prohibitive culture regarding drug use is a relativly recent phenemona. My guess is that this prohibition culture was a manifestation of the rise of American soft power.

If you're doing it in a toilet, then you will probably feel even more furtive and squalid. Felicitously, the drug is designed to banish, if only temporarily, such feelings. If it didn't, no one would do it any more. These matters used to be handled with a little more dignity. Compare the image of someone crouched over a bog lid with paper currency up their hooter with the one offered us at the beginning of The Sign of the Four: "Sherlock Holmes took his bottle from the corner of the mantelpiece and his hypodermic syringe from its neat morocco case. With his long, white, nervous fingers he adjusted the delicate needle, and rolled back his left shirt-cuff. For some little time his eyes rested thoughtfully upon the sinewy forearm and wrist all dotted and scarred with innumerable puncture-marks. Finally he thrust the sharp point home, pressed down the tiny piston, and sank back into the velvet-lined armchair with a long sigh of satisfaction."

It's bad, and he shouldn't be doing it - but it isn't half glamorous. Just look at the adjectives and adverbs: "neat", "delicate", "thoughtfully", "velvet-lined" - even "long, white, nervous" attests to a very refined, aestheticised excitement. Doyle and Watson may have disapproved of Holmes's cocaine habit, but the disapproval is bound up with a strong, sensual awareness of the excitement that even the thought of the drug can generate. And it is this which we thrill to when we are presented with images of hard drug use. The iconography has a malevolent pull to it - and Doyle was writing at a time when the drug wasn't even illegal.

The money quote

Which is that someone who is having a line is supplying himself with qualities and emotions that should rather be earned, such as confidence, talkativeness and an attractive self-image. To take a short-cut to these is as much to admit that one lacks them in oneself - and with such widespread experience, whether at first- or second-hand, there is now a pragmatic, realistic attitude to cocaine use rather than one that is stoked by sensational journalism. The news that the overwhelming majority of banknotes now contain traces of the drug gave everyone an opportunity to reflect on the drug's current place in society, whether as metaphor or simple fact. Did anyone, for instance, take any pleasure in the pictures of Boy George's recent arrest for possession in New York - in which he looked anxious, defeated, as unlike the person we remember as Boy George as you can get - or in the fact that he faces a five-year prison sentence in an American jail if convicted? Once upon a time the brouhaha would have been deafening. Now all there is is a quiet sympathy.

There is a message about Tony Blair's Britain in that last quote.

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Is cocaine a zero sum drug?

Ballsy diary.

by Shockwave (shockwaveatinorbitdotcom) on Thu Nov 10th, 2005 at 10:37:13 PM EST
Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

I treasure my one year in London.

The most civilized police, taxis, business people, bureaucrats and then some, in the world.

Aaaahh! Speakers Corner, closest to Athens 400BC.

by Shockwave (shockwaveatinorbitdotcom) on Fri Nov 11th, 2005 at 12:46:10 AM EST
I find this interesting. To me the implications of the article are the essential failure of the "war on drugs." Cocaine is now so available that it is losing some of it's "underground cachet" and at the same time some users are finding a balance with their habits that we have always been told is physiologically impossible.

Maybe in another 20 years time we can stop wasting money on prohibition and focus on treatment and helping people find their own way forward.

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Fri Nov 11th, 2005 at 02:53:29 AM EST
use drugs, or used to use drugs or experimented with drugs.
Wars on drugs are just slogans for right wing media, Christian facists, right wing police commanders and those members of the "rabble" who consume vast quantities of alcohol but don't use drugs.
by observer393 on Fri Nov 11th, 2005 at 09:30:53 PM EST

Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]