Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.

PPPs in the transportation sector : enhanced public service ?

by Agnes a Paris Mon Jan 23rd, 2006 at 03:46:48 AM EST

Promoted by Colman

See also the first installment on Central and Eastern Europe in the diary section.

The approach to transportation infrastructure finance in Europe, this diary focusing on highways, is quite different from country to country. Among the discriminating factors, ownership (public or private) of the motorway operators, as well as the way users are made to contribute to refunding the construction capex and pay for the service.

One key feature is that PPP has been embraced by most European countries as the one best way to finance the transportation infrastructure needs. Herebelow the situation in some European countries as an open door to the debate.
Plus, as an up-date, a specific focus on Spain.


At both state and local level, Spain continues to represent one of the most active proponents of toll road concessions. The promotion of enhanced accessibility and regional development through shadow toll road concessions clearly remains a key objective for many of the country's autonomous regional communities. In Galicia, the regional government is promoting five shadow toll roads. Two of these concessions were awarded in mid 2005: the €100 million ($121 million) Autovia Santiago-Brion; and the €40 million Autovia de Salnes. Valencia has announced up to nine new shadow-toll road projects as part of its regional infrastructure plan. In June, two of these, CV-35 and CV-50, were awarded to a consortium led by large Spanish concessionaire Sacyr under a €450 million 35-year concession.

In 2005, the regional government of Catalonia announced four design, build, finance, and operate (BBFO) shadow toll road concessions in a move away from user-paid toll constructs. Bids were received in September for the first of these roads, the €63 million, 27 kilometer Macanet-Platja d'Aro motorway, with others valued between €50 million and €220 million scheduled to follow in late 2005 and early 2006.

Other regional developments include: the submission of bids for Zaragoza's first shadow toll road project, worth €200 million in Aragon, northeast Spain, in September 2005; a €200 million shadow toll road package in Castilla y Leon, also to the north; and the award of the AS-18 shadow toll road concession, worth €200 million, in Asturias to Sacyr.

Closer to Madrid, but staying at the local-government level, a €400 million bridge facility for Madrid's M-30 ring road closed in mid 2005. This is Spain's biggest-ever PPP financing. Major Spanish concessionaire Cintra was awarded a 30-year concession for the €80 million M-203 user-paid toll road in July 2005.

Other European Countries

In Germany, the process is well under way as a bunch of A-modell motorway projects  are currently at BAFO stage : Bucholz-Bremmer Kreuz ; Baden Baden to Offenburg ; Bubesheim to Augsburg.
In Austria, the Ostregion scheme is a programme of PPP planned road concessions which will form a network of highways to the north, east and south of Vienna, as well as between Vienna and the Czech border. The roads are expected to enhance the Gdansk-Brno/Bratislava-Vienna corridor, forming part of the Trans European network. Total construction costs for the whole programme will be around 3 Bio €. The first package is currently in tender, and the preferred bidder will be announced in March 2006. There should be a vignette system, ie yearly charge per vehicle no matter what road you take. But no talk of real toll highways.

In Ireland , the NDP (National Development Plan) was published in 1999 with the key target to improve Ireland's physical infrastructure, particularly the road national network.
In Dec. 2003, the Ministry of Finance announced a 5-year multi-annual allocation to the NRA (National Roads Authority) of approx. 7 Bio € and the NDP has confirmed that a significant portion of the proposed investment will be delivered through a PPP programme, with a min. indicative target for private sector investment in PPP projects of 2.35 Bio €.
It is clear from the NDP that the roads sector is a PPP priority. The M3 Clonee to Kells project will stretch on almost 100 km and was won last July by the Spanish Cintra-led consortium on the basis of best priced bid. Other projects, including N7 Limerick Southern ring connecting Limerick to the Dublin road, are currently in tender.

In France, we have yet another situation : it would be unthinkable that users do not pay tolls on all major motorways, even if the caprex costs have long been recouped.
With the currently on-going privatisation process of highway operators, the State is successfully having the private sector fund the budget deficit. Both the State and banks are rubbing their hands. The latter are bound to make big money by extending loans to potential bidders lacking big pockets.
Among motorway operators still remaining partly public-owned : ASF (Autoroutes du Sud de la France) and Cofiroute have already a strong private flavour with Vinci owning a significant chunk in both. In the privatisation process, Eiffage teamed up with Australia's Macquarie to win the bid for APRR (Autoroutes Paris Rhin Rhône).

The result of all this is that transportation infrastructures are bound to be not only private-owned, but may also fall into the hands of foreign companies. Local or foreign, private companies have an ROE constrain and shareholders to satisfy, does this leave much room for the concept of public service ?

Display:
From the Hungarian experience, not much. Tough, given the thinner purses of Hungarians, that may not be a directly applicable lesson for Western Europe.

I also add that in the sector where I'd favor more construction instead of highways, the PPP scheme is also en vogue - despite negative experiences (in Britain). For example, the Perpignan-Figueras Spanish-French crossborder high-speed line (recently started, opens c. 2009) is PPP, with the state only paying in part and the two companies constructing and running it.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Thu Jan 19th, 2006 at 04:28:16 PM EST
The little I can say without disclosing privileged information, is that very few French banks got involved into the Perpigan-Figueras project, as there were strong doubts as to the economic rationale of that project . In other words, we do not know whether the project will actually attract the expected passenger volumes.

When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill
by Agnes a Paris on Fri Jan 20th, 2006 at 04:16:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, that's a doubt prevalent in the railway sector too, especially as France won't construct the missing high-speed section between Perpignan and Montpellier in the foreseeable future. There are doubts regarding the freight business, too.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Jan 20th, 2006 at 05:22:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]
is not necessarily the operator, but the regulator. Is it powerful enough? Is it knowledgeable enough? Is it in cahoots with the operator(s).

Having the private sector run some infrastructures does not necessarily shock me so long as it is the regulator (the State) which defines the needs, the rules to be followed, and enforces them.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Thu Jan 19th, 2006 at 05:35:31 PM EST
Agreed, on the other hand, there is also the cost factor, and (OK less important for highways) operational coordination.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Thu Jan 19th, 2006 at 06:02:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
As regards highway operations, they may prove tricky, especially when ETC (electronic toll collection) systems combined with tunnels are involved.
The Melbourne Citylink (Transburban) project experienced some operational difficulties at the beginning as the back office coordination had to be optimised. It has been running successfully now for a long time.
True, this is not the case with most European highways. The performance of the Toll-Collect system that will be implemented in Germany yet remains to be assessed.

When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill
by Agnes a Paris on Fri Jan 20th, 2006 at 04:25:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Straight to the point !

When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill
by Agnes a Paris on Fri Jan 20th, 2006 at 05:25:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It also seems that there is a difference between arrangements where the private party collects tolls to reimburse the construction bonds and then exits the picture when they're paid off, and the other case where the private party continues on as a regulated road operator indefinitely into the future.
by asdf on Thu Jan 19th, 2006 at 08:07:30 PM EST
There is no indefinite involvement of the private party, as Jérôme pointed out in another thread, concession agreement are always fixed-terms (sometimes very long such as the Chicago Skyway toll bridge where the remaining tenor is 99 years) but the project is then handed back to the granting authority, ie the public sector. That is the principle of the BOT scheme : build operate and transfer (ie hand back).

As to the private party exiting the project once the financing is paid off, that would not happen automatically (ie no contractual constrain in that respect). As I was pointing out, in France, there are private parties involved in the shareholder base of real toll road companies that have long recouped the construction costs, and the private parties still take advantage of the toll collection proceeds.

When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill

by Agnes a Paris on Fri Jan 20th, 2006 at 04:32:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm delighted to see your extensive diaries on roads in Europe, as I hink roads are so vital. They're the pipelines of Europe and although I know very little about them, I've always thought they have an immense value. Infrastructure makes or breaks a country, in my mind.

So, it's with a little disgrace that I need to ask this question: what does the abbrevation PPP stand for? (I'm guessing public and private and them something else...)

by Nomad (Bjinse) on Fri Jan 20th, 2006 at 07:07:13 AM EST
just to make you feel comfortable about that, the word Public Private Partnership superseded PFI because no one could remember whether PFI meant public finance initiative or private finance initiative !

When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill
by Agnes a Paris on Fri Jan 20th, 2006 at 08:37:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Two out of three right, not bad at all.
by Nomad (Bjinse) on Fri Jan 20th, 2006 at 07:37:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
In July 2005, the French government announced that it sought to raise about €11 billion by selling its shares in three partly state-owned toll road network operators: Autoroutes du Sud de la France S.A. (government stake 51 %), Autoroutes Paris-Rhin-Rhone (government stake 70%), and Sanef (government stake 76%).
The result is beyond expectations : € 14.8 billion were actually raised.

When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill
by Agnes a Paris on Fri Jan 20th, 2006 at 09:05:14 AM EST
It should be noted that an official Ministry of Finance report suggested that the stakes were worth closer to EUR 23 bn - if you used a different discount rate, i.e. the one always used previously, and not the one suggested by private financiers...

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Fri Jan 20th, 2006 at 05:48:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Let me guess,  your source is le Canard Enchaine ? I'am afraid they are not that far off the mark.

When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill
by Agnes a Paris on Mon Jan 23rd, 2006 at 04:42:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
My take

I love tolls, I think all the highways should be much more expensive that what they really are. In Eurpe there should be an extra toll.. one for the private industry (the only ones who should build highways) and one for the state...

In Catalonia you ahve to pay in all the highways...tolls everywhere. It is long due that other areas of Spain pay also a heavy price if they want to use them....

I do not drive a car I am pro-environment.. I do not want my taxes to be used for building highways or roads...I want a private company to make profit and I want the state to collect some extra taxes to fund a all-train-networked system, which is long needed in Europe for hte day we will ahve to make the change from oil to electricity-pwered transport (at most a couple of decades away anyhow).

My personal and humble opinion.

A pleasure

I therefore claim to show, not how men think in myths, but how myths operate in men's minds without their being aware of the fact. Levi-Strauss, Claude

by kcurie on Fri Jan 20th, 2006 at 02:41:34 PM EST
...also one I really feel like agreeing with. Liberty to choose use of the road and those who do, pay up. Nice.

Thanks for that. Happy thoughts.

by Nomad (Bjinse) on Fri Jan 20th, 2006 at 07:36:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]