I second that request.

Sorry I can't make my self to do it.I am geting sick by simply reading all the crap.
And I just found this on Wikipedia:
*
Some critics have accused the coalition of leading a war in Kosovo under the false pretense of genocide [6]. President Clinton of the United States, and his administration, were accused of inflating the number of Kosovar Albanians killed by Serbians[7]. Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen, giving a speech, said, "The appalling accounts of mass killing in Kosovo and the pictures of refugees fleeing Serb oppression for their lives makes it clear that this is a fight for justice over genocide [8]." On CBS' Face the Nation Cohen claimed, "We've now seen about 100,000 military-aged men missing...They may have been murdered[9]." Clinton, citing the same figure, spoke of "at least 100,000 (Kosovar Albanians) missing[10]". Later, talking about Serbian elections, Clinton said, "they're going to have to come to grips with what Mr. Milošević ordered in Kosovo...They're going to have to decide whether they support his leadership or not; whether they think it's OK that all those tens of thousands of people were killed...[11]". Clinton also claimed, in the same press conference, that "NATO stopped deliberate, systematic efforts at ethnic cleansing and genocide[12]." Clinton even compared the events of Kosovo to the Holocaust. CNN reported, "Accusing Serbia of 'ethnic cleansing' in Kosovo similar to the genocide of Jews in World War II, an impassioned President Clinton sought Tuesday to rally public support for his decision to send U.S. forces into combat against Yugoslavia, a prospect that seemed increasingly likely with the breakdown of a diplomatic peace effort[13]." Clinton's State Department also claimed Serbian troops had committed genocide. The New York Times reported, "the Administration said evidence of 'genocide' by Serbian forces was growing to include 'abhorrent and criminal action' on a vast scale. The language was the State Department's strongest yet in denouncing Yugoslav President Slobodan Milošević[14]." The State Department also gave the highest estimate of dead Albanians. The New York Times reported, "On April 19, the State Department said that up to 500,000 Kosovar Albanians were missing and feared dead[15]."

However, the numbers given by Clinton and his administration have been proven false. The official NATO body count of the events in Kosovo was 2,788 (not all of them were war crimes victims)[16], with Slobodan Milošević charged with the "murders of about 600 individually identified ethnic Albanians[17]". Critics have noted that these numbers can not be considered genocide. The headline of The Wall Street Journal, which had launched an investigation into whether genocide had occurred in Kosovo, on December 31, 1999 was "War in Kosovo Was Cruel, Bitter, Savage; Genocide It Wasn't"[18]. The Wall Street Journal wrote, "the U.N.'s International War Criminal tribunal has checked the largest reported sites first, and found most to contain no more than five bodies, suggesting intimate acts of barbarity rather than mass murder... Kosovo would be easier to investigate if it had the huge killing fields some investigators were led to expect. Instead, the pattern is of scattered killings[19]."

In addition, a United Nations Court had previously ruled that Serbian troops did not commit genocide against Albanians. The court wrote "the exactions committed by Milošević's regime cannot be qualified as criminal acts of genocide, since their purpose was not the destruction of the Albanian ethnic group[20]". According to BBC, "the decision was based on the 1948 Geneva convention which defines genocide as the intent 'to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group as such'[21]". Milošević was not charged with genocide in Kosovo by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) but the more broader "crimes against humanity"[22]. Spanish forensic surgeon Emilio Pérez Pujol, who led the Spanish forensic team in Kosovo, gave an interview to the British paper The Sunday Times. The paper wrote, "In an outspoken interview, Pujol complained he had been sent to head a large investigation team attached to the ICTY, consisting of pathologists and police specialists, to work in the north of the country. But he found that what was publicised as a search for mass graves was 'a semantic pirouette by the war propaganda machines, because we did not find one--not one--mass grave.'[23]".
*
So much about yet another" genocide" that Serbs are guilty of.
When Americans invade a country on the other side of the world that has nothing to do with USA and kill (really) 200000 Iraqis and sink them to civil war, they are "spreading democracy" and everyone have to applaud. But when Serbs are fighting for their own land and their own people their battle is compared to Holocaust. Damn justice. I hope Clinton will find same justice on the Earth or even better in "afterlife"...
And yes if anyone find something, anything about Kosovo economy (industry, production or any other real work) please let me know!


Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind...Albert Einstein

Thank you for writing this, and please don't stop trying to encourage discussion....its too important, and it isn't going away.

Perhaps we have to think of how to approach the discussion differently. For example, another way to approach this in a future diary would be to identify the key points of agreement in the current and ongoing discussions in Kosovo, then pose it as a "debate", asking the readership as a whole to problem-solve how they might approach this whole issue. It is a very important and interesting issue to consider.

Unfortunately, I have noticed that there are certain topics that get introduced here at ET, that really bring out strong nationalistic (and worse) kind of responses (note anytime a discussion of Turkey is posted...). Nonetheless, despite people's emotional responses to different topics, it shouldn't stop us from being educated about the issues nor stop us from trying to have discussions about what might be best.

In particular, now that I think of it, the whole idea of a country splitting apart from a larger country is a difficult topic to discuss. Somehow, I think that it would have been difficult to have an unemotional discussion between Great Britain and the American colonies in 1776, when they the colonies decided to become independent...and they weren't in the same region.

This is an informative piece. Please, keep writing on this...

"Once in awhile we get shown the light, in the strangest of places, if we look at it right" - Hunter/Garcia

Quote:
However, it did and I can say that it was a bit disappointing because everything it goes back to trying to prove facts and not trying to figure out something for the future.  
*
So now facts are not important??? While future should be rosy cause it shouldn't be based on the facts.

Quote:
But, I just wished it went differently.  
*
I bet...

I suppose this is that fruitful discussion of future that you recommend to go "differently"?

Quote:
Simply put, Kosovo is going to become independent, internationals and local actors are trying to integrate the Kosovo Serbs, and Serbs just have to accept that.  There is no point to talk anymore about numbers and stuff because it won't lead us anywhere.
*
And you call it discussion? Same like EU `negotiators" that in Austria first delivered "verdict"of independant Kosovo and now are calling Serbs to "negotiate"...WHAT to negotiate? What else one would say on this but "cut a crap"! You already occupied Kosovo...Enjoy it while you can!


Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind...Albert Einstein

As far as I know, few people on ET are in favour of deportation.

Hardly a pain in the ass, and we wouldn't like to see you leave.

I would like to ask everyone to try and refrain from personal attacks please.