Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.

Fortress America

by XicanoPwr Tue Feb 28th, 2006 at 10:41:37 PM EST

Regardless of the political season, the issue of immigration is always considered a hot topic. In fact, the topic of immigration brings out every political spectrum when trying to solve the issue. Moreover, the most vocal of the groups most likely are xenophobic hate groups. Frighteningly, their presence have seeped into Congress and are constantly advocating for draconian measures to be included in any type of immigration reform bill. Even more alarmingly, nativism - a movement which is oftentimes fueled by xenophobia and hate - have  already entered into the mainstream media.

Nativism, the hostile reaction towards the flux of immigration, is not really a new phenomenon that currently was spawned within this new century. According to David Bennett, author of The Party Fear, nativist movements usually occur during times of major social, economic, or political disturbances are taking place. Oftentimes, American nativists will project their insecurities on the immigrants, ethnic/religious groups, or anybody different from their own for the troubles that America is experiencing.


It is interesting to note, the Immigration Act of 1965 signed by President Lyndon Johnson is considered to be part of Civil Rights legislation. Along with the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act, the Immigration Act became one the cornerstones to the Civil Rights Movement. The Act, was to rid the nation's history of racism and discrimination in immigration. It removed barriers based on national origin, and measures favoring immigrants from Western European countries. It also opened the door to more diverse patterns of immigration. Now, those changes and the Civil Rights tradition are once again under attack. The anti-immigrant sentiment is sweeping the country like wildfire.

Inspired by political successes in Arizona, and fanned by national and grassroots anti-immigrant groups, and like the predecessors, nativists continue the tradition of misrepresenting and disguising "their xenophobic and racists beliefs in order to garner favor with the American public."

One can expect to find groups like "Minutemen," who are trying to frame themselves as brave souls who are taking it upon themselves to protect our borders from lazy, shiftless, drug smuggling South-of-the-Border immigrants. In fact, they had to armed themselves, just in case they were attacked from violent border runners, particularly in the middle of the desert, at night, when no one else was around.

So it is not surprising a group like The Minutemen are reported to have to racist, White Supremacist groups. In fact, Minutemen found Chris Simcox and Jim Gilchrist are following in the footsteps of other anti-immigrant activists before them. Klansmen were on the Mexican border 28 years before the Minutemen came up with this bright idea. In 1977, the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan lead by David Duke and Tom Metzger also hatched the same plan of taking the law into their own hands to keep immigrants at bay. They formed Klan Border Watch, a KKK vigilante border patrol in southern California. The "Klan Border Watch" claimed to stretch from Texas to California, and was part of the "battle to halt the flow of illegal aliens streaming across the border from Mexico."

The Minutemen may speak of patriotism, and claim they have "no affiliation with, nor will we accept any assistance by or interference from, separatists, racists, or supremacy groups" but the simple truth, it just another public relation bullshit spin. Even more sickening, trigger happy white, jack-booted, skinhead members from the neo-Nazi National Alliance and other sick white supremacist groups are chomping at the bit to participate.

Perhaps most disturbing is Jim Gilchrist's partnership with Swift Boater Jerome Corsi to write a book about Mexico's conspiracy to trash America: [Hat tip to Orcinus.]

Jim Gilchrist, co-founder of the Minuteman Project, and Jerome Corsi, Harvard Ph.D. and co-author of the #1 New York Times bestseller "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry," have teamed up to write a shocking account of the endless flow of drugs, terrorists, and economic refugees at America's borders -- and to expose the Mexican government's open complicity in this full-fledged crisis. The to-be-titled book will be published by World Ahead Publishing and available in bookstores nationwide this July.
...
"Illegal immigration is bankrupting states along the border, but this is about more than economics -- we're placing our national security at risk," says Gilchrist, who along with other Minuteman Project volunteers has come under fire while on patrol and carrying nothing more than binoculars and cell phones. "Drug lords and violent gangs like MS-13 are streaming into the U.S. from Mexico. Terrorists are also walking in unopposed; our southwestern border is littered with Arabic papers and Islamic prayer rugs."
Sure it is easy to dismiss this book as a "joke," but this is exactly how propaganda is supposed to work because propaganda can be either blatant or subtle as a joke. Once that stage is completed, they will employ symbols (e.g., waving the flag) to stir audience's emotions to win their approval until their the sick agenda has been met. And what once was considered an "outrageous idea" - the creation of Fortress America


- has now gained acceptance.
The December House vote of 260-159 is the strongest endorsement yet for building a wall, which Rep. Duncan Hunter, a San Diego County Republican, has been pushing for two decades as a tactic against illegal immigration. Support for the wall was even stronger than for the bill it was attached to -- a larger plan to curb terrorism and illegal immigration sponsored by Wisconsin Republican Rep. James Sensenbrenner that passed 239 to 182.
This movement must be halted before any outrage to stop America's xenophobia will be easily ignored or we might as well say:

Welcome to Fortress America!

[Crossposted on my ¡Para Justicia y Libertad!]

Display:
I would not take issue with anything you have said regarding xenophobic hate groups or nativism.  I don't know much about the Minutemen, but their presence concerns me, and if, as you say, they support prejudice of one class of immigrants over another, I would condemn them, as you do.

I am concerned about lack of control of immigrants coming into the country.  This concern is very heightened after 9/11, and the ease with which are country can be penetrated by those who hate and would destroy the country, such as the 9/11 hijackers.  IMO, we can no longer afford the ineffecient immigration system that we have put up with for years.

A new system which is fair to people who desire to come to America, regardless of race, color or creed, and live and work in peace should be developed, IMO.  But this system should be the only way for entry into the country for people who want to live here.  The random nature of people crossing the borders and the lack of control of illegal immigrants in the country is dangerous and a disgrace.  It's unfair as well to those people who want to follow our immigration rules, and wait for years to get in, while others just ignore the rules and hop across the borders.  I don't really blame the immigrants who do that, I blame America for not fixing the problem.  We are a country of immigrants, and should support immigration wholeheartedly, once again IMHO.  But today's system stinks--and it's the fault of our politicians who have not fixed it, us the people because we haven't demanded it, and many others such as employers who know very well they are employeeing illegal immigrants, yet take advantage of their situation, ignore the laws, and employee them anyway--sometimes at below minimum wage, other times knowing they can never collect on the social security that is being held from their paychecks.  Congress needs to cut out the partisanship on this one, take responsibility and do their job--something Congress often puts low on their priority list, far far down the list from getting re-elected.

by wchurchill on Tue Feb 28th, 2006 at 11:05:23 PM EST
One of the meain reasons for the hugh influx, is globalization. Ever since Latin America was under the mercy of neo-liberalism and globalization, the current economic situation down there has become one of the worst in recent years. As long as US corporations only invest in poor countries because they can make greater profits from low wage levels and can get access to their natural resources, the problem will never go away.

I taught an ESL class and the first question I asked, "what brought you to this country?" and all said the same thing. Then I asked, but if you are only making a few more dollars, then how can you say it is better to live here. Their answer, the cost of living is so high in their countries, that there no way anybody can live there. And because the dollar is stronger, the money they send back home to their family in their country, can last them atleast a month, until they send them more.

So, yes we do have a problem with immigration, but we also the cause of the problem too. So the lawmakers are hoping to sweep the problem under the rug by deportation and hope it will go away, but in reality, the problem will only get worse.

Corruption and hypocrisy ought not to be inevitable products of democracy, as they undoubtedly are today. - Gandhi

by XicanoPwr (chicanopwr at gmail.com) on Wed Mar 1st, 2006 at 12:32:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I have reflected upon your diary and following comments, much of which I agree with as I reflected in my comments.I think we agree that the US immigration program needs to be fair and equitable, and not have a tinge of prejudice based on race, color or creed.  I imagine you also agree with my comments on the unfair practises of some employers paying illegals below minimum wage, and for others who are "on the books" not having access to the benefits of their social security contributions.
So, yes we do have a problem with immigration, but we also the cause of the problem too.
And we seem to agree there is a problem with our approach to immigration today.  I'm not clear on what you think the solution is,,,what practical policy changes should be made to change the system.
by wchurchill on Wed Mar 1st, 2006 at 01:20:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I taught an ESL class and the first question I asked, "what brought you to this country?" and all said the same thing. Then I asked, but if you are only making a few more dollars, then how can you say it is better to live here. Their answer, the cost of living is so high in their countries, that there no way anybody can live there. And because the dollar is stronger, the money they send back home to their family in their country, can last them atleast a month, until they send them more.

I've always thought that if the US wanted to get serious about stemming the flow of immigrants across the border, there would need to be an effort to provide people  thinking about immigration opportunities at home.  I expect that if Mexico could rise into the ranks of high income economies, there would be a huge opportunity to sell US products.  Rising wages in Mexico doesn't need to mean lowering wages in the US.  

The experience of the EU shows shows that integrating low income countries is possible.  

And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg

by ManfromMiddletown (manfrommiddletown at lycos dot com) on Wed Mar 1st, 2006 at 10:50:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That could easily happen if American companies moved their plants to Mexico. But that would be globalization...
by asdf on Thu Mar 2nd, 2006 at 08:53:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It's more than that.  If NAFTA had a political component like the EU, Mexico would have to adhere to basic labor standards and demonstrate a committment to democracy and civil society that's been lacking.  

And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
by ManfromMiddletown (manfrommiddletown at lycos dot com) on Thu Mar 2nd, 2006 at 11:43:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]

Top Diaries