by Jerome a Paris
Thu Jun 15th, 2006 at 03:57:46 AM EST
Rising disability rates test policymakers
Soaring numbers of people on disability benefit across the industrialised world are becoming a "major policy concern" that has to be addressed as part of a reappraisal of job-creation strategies, governments were warned yesterday.
(...)
Some 265m people of working age did not have jobs in the OECD countries, with 37m classified as unemployed.
Another 42m of the total are on long-term sickness and disability benefits, with many others drawing other welfare benefits, including payments for lone parents and early retirement, according to the OECD.
'Real Swedish jobless rate 15%'
Sweden's unemployment rate is 15 per cent, three times the figure being used by the government, according to new research from McKinsey Global Institute, the think tank.
Now I am very suspicious of business consultants churning our studies saying that the jobs market is worse than we think, because I am pretty sure they have some "reform" they want to peddle, but the two articles point out nicely that joblessness is a tricky concept to measure, as are unemployment rates, and that the focus on "old Europe"'s unemployment rate at the exclusion of everything else to point out how bad things are there becomes all the more suspicious.
Why do we "care" so much about the unemployed than about the "disabled"? Is it because one category has a lower standard of living than the other? Is one status less shameful than the other?

proportion of disabled men, per age class, various countries
