Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.

European Breakfast - July 26

by Izzy Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 12:19:17 AM EST

We fetch fire and water, run about all day among the shops and markets, and get our clothes and shoes made and mended, and are the victims of these details, and once in a fortnight we arrive perhaps at a rational moment.

Ralph Waldo Emerson


Display:
The Guardian:  Iran warns the west: ignore us at your peril

Iran warned the west yesterday that attempts to broker a Lebanon peace deal at today's Rome summit are destined to fail and it predicted a backlash across the Muslim world unless Israel's military forces were immediately reined in.
Senior government officials said the exclusion from the summit of Iran, Syria and their Lebanese ally Hizbullah meant that no lasting settlement was possible.

Hamid Reza Asefi, the foreign ministry spokesman in Tehran, said: "They should have invited all the countries of the region, including Syria and Iran, if they want peace. How can you tackle these important issues without having representatives of all countries in the region?"

The Rome conference is to be attended by the US, Canada, Britain, France, Spain, Germany, Turkey, Russia, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan, as well as the UN and the World Bank.



Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes
by Izzy (izzy at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 12:23:45 AM EST
It's okay, the israelis have declared war and then declared peace on so many occasions witout consulting the other side that the UN has decided to copy them.

If the Israelis are fighting Hezbollah (who seem to live in every square inch of Lebanon to judge by the targetting, including UN watchtowers), then it'd help if somebody to do with that organisation was at the peace talks.

Rice can say what she likes about not returning to the status quo ante, but to ignore one half of the problem when seeking a solution is utterly futile

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 05:10:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Guardian:  Reid promises electronic border controls to check visitor numbers

The home secretary, John Reid, yesterday promised to introduce electronic border controls that will count in and out of the country the 90 million people who travel to Britain each year, but admitted the new system will not be fully running until 2014.

Mr Reid said the embarkation controls will form the cornerstone of his package to restore public confidence in the immigration service that he had declared "not fit for purpose". The "eBorders" programme logging all entries and exits will be introduced in stages over the next eight years, starting with highest risk routes, with enforcement action taken against those who overstay their welcome.



Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes
by Izzy (izzy at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 12:27:13 AM EST
I want to see enforcement action on Blair.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 01:42:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This is another 5 o'clock folly from the man who thinks that "strut and bluster" is the most enviable product of state policy.

Expect a photo op soon of normal immigration folk in shiny uniforms with peaked caps, bold epaulettes and ribbon looking uncomfortable as they beat up the first non-white person to emerge from a plane whilst a beaming JR looks on.

Then they'll all bugger off to Whitehall and the uniforms will be put away and forgotten till the next PR crisis.

This isn't Government, this is damge control masquerading as news management which is all this lot are capable of.

We need a period of quiet competence, not John Reid.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 05:15:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Australian:  Moscow arms sale to Chavez angers US

HUGO Chavez, the ardently anti-American President of Venezuela, arrived in Russia late last night to sign a billion-dollar arms deal that has infuriated and alarmed the US.
The self-styled leftist revolutionary will sign an agreement with President Vladimir Putin to buy 30 Sukhoi Su-30 fighter jets and 30 military helicopters worth $US1billion.

The two leaders will also discuss plans to build two Kalashnikov factories in Venezuela - to add to the 100,000 Kalashnikov AK-103 assault rifles Venezuela has bought from Russia in the past year.

The arms deals - and the visit by Mr Chavez - are the latest evidence of Mr Putin's drive to re-establish Russia as a counterbalance to the West in international affairs.

But they threaten to sour relations with Washington just a week after Mr Putin and President George W. Bush publicly reaffirmed their friendship at the G8 summit in St Petersburg.

The US has repeatedly asked Russia to reconsider its arms sales to Venezuela, which the State Department says does not co-operate in the fight against terrorism.



Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes
by Izzy (izzy at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 12:38:07 AM EST
Kommersant:  Venezuela Adds Russia to Its Arsenal

A delegation of dignitaries including Volgograd Governor Nikolay Maksyuta and the Blue Flow, a Cossack band, met the Venezuelan president at the airport of Volgograd. After the president stepped onto the ladder, Maksyuta rushed to hug and kiss him. Hugo Chavez greeted Nikolay Maksyuta like an old friend and the Blue Flow stroke up a Cossack song. They gave Hugo Chavez a glass of vodka on a saber, and the leader drank it in one gulp.

(...)The Venezuelan leader said that he was going to discuss in Moscow the construction of a pipe plant in Venezuela for a stunning 8,000 km-long pipeline that would run throughout the whole Latin America and would cost some $20 billion. Hugo Chavez reported that he was planning "another project with the share of RUSAL" but gave no details. "We are trying to break the American blockade," Chavez said. "They want to disarm us and reign over the whole world."

(...)Chavez repeatedly refers to the motive that drives him to buy more Russian arms -"the threat of American military invasion." He says Washington has mapped out a plan of the attack on Venezuela, and Caracas is familiar with the details. Hugo Chavez frequently instruct his people on how they should prepare to hold the line against the United States - blow up oil deposits, go to the mountains and "defend every street, every hill and every corner" with Kalashnikovs from Russia.



Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes
by Izzy (izzy at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 01:46:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That article is funny. "publically reaffirmed their friendship".
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 01:58:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What did the US expect after they blocked Venezuela's attempts to get new Western aircrat (and parts for maintenance of old ones)? Of course they are going to go and buy Chinese and Russian planes.

Don't they say "keep your friends close and your enemies closer"? The US should be engaging Venezuela instead of pushing it into Russia's arms like they did Castro.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman

by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:03:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Can someone ship a box of copies of The Prince and The Art of War to these people?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:07:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Or maybe the Dummies Guide to International Politics.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:08:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Why don't we just let them crash?

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:14:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Because we're in the back of the bus.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:46:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Can't we get off?

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:53:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Apparently not. They seem to have locked the doors and to be intent on driving down mountain roads at high speed.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:56:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
"Let's roll", then.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 03:01:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Reuters:

UN deaths put pressure on Rome talks for ceasefire

BEIRUT (Reuters) - Israel's killing of four U.N. observers piled pressure on an international conference in Rome on Wednesday to end a 15-day-old Middle East conflict, as Hizbollah vowed not to accept any "humiliating" truce terms.

United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan demanded Israel investigate the "apparently deliberate targeting" of a U.N. post in southern Lebanon where an Israeli air strike killed the four U.N. military observers on Tuesday.

Israel, waging a military offensive in Lebanon against Hizbollah guerrillas, announced it would hold a probe and expressed regret at the deaths but said it was shocked Annan had suggested the observers may have been deliberately targeted.

A Chinese national was among the four observers killed, China's official Xinhua news agency reported. It said the other three were from Finland, Austria and Canada.

U.N. officials said the air strike had caused the building housing the observers to collapse and that rescue teams had been sent to retrieve the bodies from the rubble.

"(This) attack on a long established and clearly marked U.N. post at Khiam occurred despite personal assurances given to me by (Israeli) Prime Minister Ehud Olmert that U.N. positions would be spared Israeli fire," Annan said in a statement.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 01:52:03 AM EST
It's not like we don't know where this is coming from...
Haaretz: Israel accuses UN of collaborating with Hezbollah (11/09/2005)
Israel is lobbying to have the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) mission in southern Lebanon reduced in size, saying that the organization collaborates with Hezbollah.

"The UN is in fact collaborating with a terrorist organization," says a political source in Jerusalem. "This is an intolerable situation, when the UN speaks at the same time of fighting terror."

In diplomatic meetings with the U.S. and France in the past weeks, a series of complaints about UNIFIL were brought up: The UN force maintains a permanent dialogue with Hezbollah, chiefly because of UNIFIL's own interest in survival; in many places along the Israel-Lebanon border, Hezbollah has posts and positions adjacent to UNIFIL positions; deployment of the force serves as an excuse for the Lebanese government not to deploy in the south, as required by UN Security Council resolutions; and UNIFIL treats the IDF as equivalent to the Hezbollah terrorist organization when reporting violations of the cease-fire.



Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:10:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This is paranoia taken to the nth degree. I can only imagine they have become so used to demanding and getting whatever they want from the USA that anyone who doesn't immediately do what they want must be in league with terrorists.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 04:59:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That's a pretty accurate assessment.
by Richard Lyon (rllyon@gmail.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 10:13:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Here is a rather clear sign that Israel is targeting civilians intentionally, from Globe and Mail:

Ali Al-Akhrass, a pharmacist who had brought his family back to Lebanon to spend the summer with relatives, died, along with his wife, Amira, and their four children as a result of the July 16 attack. Residents of Aytaroun say a total of 11 people were killed because of the air strike, all of them members of the same extended family.

Just why the Al-Akhrass home was specifically targeted by the Israeli air force is about to become the subject of international scrutiny. The New York-based Human Rights Watch plans to highlight the incident in a forthcoming report about Israel's alleged targeting of innocent civilians during the 13-day-old conflict. "This case is of particular interest to us because this family came from Canada to Lebanon after 15 years away, just a few weeks before the bombing started," said Peter Bouckaert, director of emergencies for the rights group. "It's very clear that they had no Hezbollah links. It just shows how indiscriminate the attacks on villages are."



*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 04:16:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Haaretz: Was there a proper decision process? (Aluf Benn, July 26, 2006)
The decision to launch a broad military operation in Lebanon, in response to the abduction of soldiers near Zar'it on the morning of July 12, was made with lightning speed. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert decided almost immediately on a strong military response, and in the evening he presented for cabinet approval a plan for an air assault on Hezbollah's rocket launchers and symbols of the Lebanese government, topped by Beirut International Airport. Ministers were told that Haifa might be hit by retaliatory fire, and that the operation would not be brief. The government approved it unanimously.
No, there was no deliberate targeting of civilians.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 05:41:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]
There was debate recently whether Israel reduced its attacks on Lebanese civilian facilities (by an order of magnitude), or are the factors of people fleeing and rescuers finding corpses days later in the rubble enough to explain any reduction.

I scrolled through Reuters' news reports, and put the day's first and last reported figures in a spreadsheet. I made two graphs:

Image Hosting by PicsPlace.to

Image Hosting by PicsPlace.to

Notes:

  • On the second graph, next to the raw data (in red), I added a crude sliding average (light blue; 1/3 of each day moved to the day before and 1/4 to two days earlier except at the ends).
  • No precise data for 18 and 19 July: the Reuters news reports just said "more than 200" and "more than 300" -- I tabled 200 and 300. But while the latter must have been just barely above (next morning it was 306), other agencies reported figures between 215 and 250 during the day of 18 July.
  • The latest figure I found today morning was 422 Lebanese dead.

So there seems to have been a drop from 20-50 deaths per day to 10-25 deaths, only a halving. So with the factors named above, I don't see much of a real let-up.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 04:52:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Associated Press

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip (AP) -- About 50 Israeli tanks moved back into northern Gaza early Wednesday and five Palestinians were killed in airstrikes as Israel pressed ahead with its nearly month-long Gaza offensive.

Israeli aircraft carried out at least three airstrikes as the troops moved in, killing five people and wounding 15, hospital officials said. Two of the five dead were militants, but the other three were not immediately identified, they said.

The Israeli military said forces were operating in northern Gaza as part of a campaign to stop terrorism and rocket barrages at Israel. The military said aircraft targeted three groups of militants who were approaching the troops. Exchanges of fire between the two sides were reported through the night.

A number of Israeli tanks and bulldozers also crossed into southern Gaza near Khan Younis on Tuesday, witnesses said.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 01:55:53 AM EST

Whoops. Looks as if the "IQ is mostly genetic" studies are hopelessly contaminated by sample bias.


David Kirp on Heredity and IQ Once Again...
In the New York Times magazine: After the Bell Curve - New York Times: Then along came Eric Turkheimer.... In combing through the research, he noticed that the twins being studied had middle-class backgrounds.... Together with several colleagues, Turkheimer searched for data on twins from a wider range of families. He found what he needed in a sample from the 1970s of more than 50,000 American infants, many from poor families, who had taken I.Q. tests at age 7. In a widely-discussed 2003 article, he found that, as anticipated, virtually all the variation in I.Q. scores for twins in the... [Brad DeLong's Semi-Daily Journal]

Whatever IQ measures.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:09:30 AM EST
As they say, IQ measures the ability to do IQ tests.

And it's true the "genetic science" involved is soft and fuzzy. Mostly new studies of the literature, which is in itself often questionable.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:23:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The problem I have with this sort of crap is that I'm not aware that humanity is sufficiently genetically diverse for race to have any meaning. So any test  which claims to detect "race" must be 8/3 Pi r cubed.

I read somewhere that there is more genetic diversity in a litter of puppies than in the entire human race. I admit that this is a nice glib phrase that is probably meaningless, but it conveys a truth that humans simply cannot be divided into race.

I believe Heydrich had a similar problem with the Jews during WWII.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 05:06:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, and there's the Social Darwinism aspect too: the Bell Curve argued that society's winners were up there because they were the brightest and best who had fought to the top, while the poor were poor because they were the rejects.

From the NYT Mag article quoted in extenso by Brad DeLong:

A later study of French youngsters adopted between the ages of 4 and 6 shows the continuing interplay of nature and nurture. Those children had little going for them. Their I.Q.s averaged 77, putting them near retardation. Most were abused or neglected as infants.... Nine years later, they retook the I.Q. tests.... The amount they improved was directly related to the adopting family's status. Children adopted by farmers and laborers had average I.Q. scores of 85.5; those placed with middle-class families had average scores of 92. The average I.Q. scores of youngsters placed in well-to-do homes climbed more than 20 points, to 98.... Taken together, these studies show that the issue has changed: it is no longer a matter of whether the environment matters but when and how it matters. And poverty, quite clearly, is an important part of the answer.
(bolding mine)
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 06:16:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Stephen Jay Gould's The Mismeasure of Man is a thorough debunking of IQ, social Darwinism, scientific racism and eugenics. Required reading.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 06:39:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Independent:

Moratorium on new soya crops wins reprieve for rainforest

 The Amazon rainforest has won a temporary reprieve from an invasion by soya farmers, after Brazil's major traders in the bean agreed to a two-year moratorium on crops from newly deforested land.

In recent years soya has overtaken illegal logging and ranching as the main engine of deforestation in the biggest and most important rainforest on the planet.

John Sauven, a campaign director at Greenpeace, said: "This is an important step as this is the first time we've had the multinationals and the Brazilians sit down and talk about environmental issues. But it will only prove to be a major breakthrough if real action is taken on the ground."

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:11:09 AM EST
Seattle PI:  'Zombies' booked for carrying fake WMDs

MINNEAPOLIS -- Six friends spruced up in fake blood and tattered clothing were arrested in downtown Minneapolis on suspicion of toting "simulated weapons of mass destruction."

Police said the group were allegedly carrying bags with wires sticking out, making it look like a bomb, while meandering and dancing to music as part of a "zombie dance party" Saturday night.

"They were arrested for behavior that was suspicious and disturbing," said Lt. Gregory Reinhardt, a police spokesman. Police also said the group was uncooperative and intimidated people with their "ghoulish" makeup.

One group member said the "weapons" were actually backpacks modified to carry a homemade stereos and the suspects were jailed without reason. None of the six adults and one juvenile arrested have been charged.

"Given the circumstance of them being uncooperative ... why would you have those (bags) if not to intimidate people?" said Inspector Janee Harteau. "It's not a case of (police) overreacting."

Harteau also said police were on high alert because they'd gotten a bulletin about men who wear clown makeup while attacking and robbing people in other states.



Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes
by Izzy (izzy at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:20:27 AM EST
I think PT Barnum was being cruel when he said "Never overestimate the intelligence of the American people".

But I think the addition of a uniform certainly seems to impair their humour if nothing else.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 05:19:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Glaxo has bird flu 'breakthrough'
GlaxoSmithKline believes it has a vaccine for the deadly H5N1 avian flu that may be capable of mass production by 2007. [BBC News]
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:30:08 AM EST
Ah, this would have nothing to do with the fact that they realised how much Hoffman La Roche were cmaking from Tamiflu, would it ?

Did anybody ever hear of Bird Flu before 1999 ? Three things happened that year;-
Hoffman La Roche got fined $500 million for offences realted to vitamin in the US market.

Hoffman La Roche patented tamiflu

The first televised bird flu scare which sent sales of Tamiflu soaring.

Anyone care to join the dots ?

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 05:24:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Iran warns: ignore us at your peril
Tehran predicts summit failure as UN observers die in Israeli airstrike. [Guardian Unlimited World Latest]
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:31:33 AM EST
Neither Israel, nor Syria, nor a Hezbollah representative [unless a Hezbollah representative is sent representing Lebanon] will be at the summit, so I think Iran is quite right.

Now, I look at the Lebanese Cabinet on wikipedia and what do I find?

Shiite Muslims
Faouzi Salloukh     Foreign Affairs     Independent (Hezbollah-endorsed)
This is just too funny.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:51:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Ukraine MPs vow to defy president after talks fail
Ukraine's beleaguered president Viktor Yushchenko faces a constitutional crisis after tangled coalition talks collapsed. [Guardian Unlimited World Latest]
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:32:01 AM EST
Ukraine's beleaguered president, Viktor Yushchenko, yesterday faced a constitutional crisis when MPs said they would refuse to obey any order from him after tangled coalition talks collapsed, giving him the legal right to dissolve parliament.

...

The crisis came after Mr Yushchenko, elected president on a wave of pro-western sentiment after the "Orange revolution" in November 2004, refused to accept parliament's nomination of his rival, Viktor Yanukovich, as prime minister.

Mr Yushchenko made no comment on the nomination, and as the deadline passed at midnight on Monday, gained the legal right to dissolve parliament and call elections. Most analysts think the Orange revolution's leader, whose popularity has collapsed after months of feckless government, is stalling and will eventually accept Mr Yanukovich as prime minister.

What games is The Guardian playing here? No "coalition talks" have failed.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:47:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That's Yushenko's line: as a president, he has a right to inject himself into the coalition and reformat coalition as he likes. Failed talks reference his failure to do this so far on his terms.

Pro-Western Our Ukraine sets terms for joining Rada coalition


KIEV, July 26 (RIA Novosti) - Ukraine's long-running political drama took its latest twist Wednesday with an announcement from the pro-presidential Our Ukraine bloc that it was ready to work within a new parliamentary coalition majority if other factions accepted its terms.

"We are ready for cooperation on condition the country continues its domestic and foreign policy line," he said.

Zvarych said Ukraine should continue working to join the World Trade Organization by the end of 2006 and the European Union, as well as maintain close ties with NATO and eventually join the alliance. Viktor Yushchenko has made these priorities since he won the presidency following the 2004 "orange revolution."

The pro-presidential faction had previously demanded the disbandment of the "anti-crisis" coalition of the Party of Regions, the Socialist Party and the Communist Party, which holds 240 seats in the 450-seat Supreme Rada, and a ban on the Communists from joining a would-be alliance.

by blackhawk on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 06:49:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Iran anger at Lebanon aid 'block'
Iranian media say Turkey and Saudi Arabia have stopped Iran using their air space to send aid to Lebanon. [BBC News]
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:33:33 AM EST
The Simpsons has announced next season's guest voices.

BBC News:

Kiefer Sutherland and The White Stripes are to make guest appearances in the next series of The Simpsons.
Sutherland plays a hard-nosed colonel in an episode that sees Homer Simpson accidentally joining the US army.

Rock group The White Stripes voice themselves when Bart Simpson organises a benefit concert in Springfield.

Other guests confirmed for the 18th series of the animated comedy include Natalie Portman, Eric Idle and talk show psychologist Dr Phil McGraw.



Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes
by Izzy (izzy at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:38:53 AM EST
EU Observer:

EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - EU trade commissioner Peter Mandelson on Tuesday (25 July) said he intends to launch a programme to save or extend parts of the so-called Doha global trade deal, which fell into "coma" the day before.

"As a starting point, we should extract from the rubble of the negotiation a significant development package," Mr Mandelson said at a press conference in Brussels.

The commissioner, who compared the Doha round to a patient in coma dependent on life support, also said he would like to see action from US president George W. Bush.

"I hope that president Bush will announce that he will veto any move to extend or roll over the existing US farm bill [on agricultural subsidies]," Mr Mandelson said.

With Mr Bush's trade mandate running out in 2007 - allowing him to negotiate trade deals on behalf of the US - there is little likelihood of the Doha round being revived unless, as Mr Mandelson hopes, Mr Bush is able to extend it.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:47:54 AM EST
You, Sir, Are Not Welcome in Rome
[Update added at the end.]

Here's the shorter version of the paternalistic, imperialistic, condescending Democrats:
After we destroy your country and unleash a vicious civil war which takes the lives of between 100 and 200 innocent Iraqis every day, and after we see that you are installed as leader of this dying country and prop up your doomed and ineffectual government, we expect you to repeat our propaganda without question or criticism.  If you do not, you obviously cannot expect to be warmly received in Rome.  We have lost American lives and treasure on this disastrous venture.  True, we had no justifiable reason whatsoever for taking these actions, and it was absolutely none of our goddamned business.  But we did so anyway, out of the endless beneficence of our magnanimous, "civilizing" hearts.  So you will express appropriate thanks, you ungrateful bastard.  Otherwise, get the hell out of town.
Here's the longer version.   I draw your attention to these paragraphs:
Senate Democrats in a letter to Maliki called his statements "very troubling" and asked for an explanation, but did not demand that his speech be canceled.

Several lawmakers said they would press Maliki for his view on the Middle East conflict in meetings before the prime minister makes his address, which is intended to try to reassure lawmakers that U.S. lives and money have not been squandered on a country descending into civil war.
Oh, my, yes: we have to reassure the lawmakers -- who helped make this disaster possible, a disaster which they still will not disavow -- that their immoral and illegitimate actions were not taken in vain.

And note this:
Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada said Maliki, in his White House appearance with President George W. Bush, again failed to state his view of Hizbollah, which the United States deems a terrorist organization.

"We have spent hundreds of billions of dollars in Iraq. We've lost more than 2,500 American soldiers, more than 20,000 wounded. We deserve that answer," Reid said.
With all due respect -- which is to say: none -- shut up, you offensive idiot.  No one asked us to "spen[d] hundreds of billions of dollars in Iraq."  No one asked us to send Americans to Iraq.  We did that all on our own, goddamn us.

One more excerpt:
House Democrats in their letter to Hastert cited reports that Iraqi leaders were "increasingly influenced" by Iran, and said the "goal of the invasion in Iraq was not to remove one threat in favor of another."
A number of people pointed out this precise danger, among many others, before the invasion of Iraq began.  Our governing class ignored all such warnings.

The attitude of Western colonialism and condescension is nauseating in the extreme -- and it is typical of the Democrats.  This is why I have repeatedly said that everyone in the political and foreign policy establishment works out of the same playbook: the playbook of "Western exceptionalism," which gives us the "right" to "civilize" the rest of the world by force, whether they want us to or not.  Our narcissism is disgusting and repellent.  We have but a single, monolithic, warmongering establishment.  Since these views are so entrenched in all parts of the governing class, the next war cannot be far away.

What an absolutely sickening nation we are today.  God can forgive us, although I have no idea why He would.  I do not expect the rest of the world to -- nor should they. [Once Upon a Time...]
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:48:33 AM EST
Don't vote for the Democrats, vote for someone else. This is still no improvement on 2004.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 02:59:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Can't vote for the Democrats. I'm not an American, even tho' somehow their president gets to run my government.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 05:28:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
An MSM article on the elected Democrats' so far most shameful move in the Boston Globe: Democrats rip Iraqi leader as weak.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 04:11:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Democrats rip Iraqi leader as weak.

Well, they are experts in the field of jellyfish-like spinelessness, so I guess they'd know weakness when they saw it.


keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 05:31:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Better Now

My friend is an old Middle East hand who has some  good sources on the Israeli side, mostly ex-military and ex-Mossad, plus some contacts among the Bush I realist crowd -- although of course they're not in government any more either.

He didn't have any secret dope on what the next military or diplomatic moves will be -- it seems to be purely day-to-day now -- but he DID get a clear sense that the Americans and the Israelis both understand now that they are in serious danger of losing the war.

They're freaking out about this, of course, because they're deathly afraid that if Israel is seen to fail, and fail badly, against Hizbullah, everybody and their Palestinian uncle will get it into their heads that they can take a crack at the Zionist entity. (The tough guy realists see this as a disaster in its own right; the "cry and shoot" gang frets the IDF will have to pound the West Bank and Gaza even harder to re-establish the balance of terror. Either way, it's an unacceptable outcome.)

Plan B, then, is to try to "make something happen" on the ground -- although what, exactly, isn't clear. Today it was killing a low-level Hizbullah leader (in a border village they supposedly secured three days ago) and pumping him up as a big catch (shades of Zarqawi's 28,000 "lieutenants".) Tomorrow it will be something else -- maybe the capture of the "terror capital" of south Lebanon, beautiful downtown Bint Jbeil.

But, of course, I'm getting the impression from reading between the lines of the official propaganda that the IDF is struggling just to produce these little symbolic victories -- they seem to be "securing" the same objectives over and over again. So my guess is that the internal debate will now turn to how many more divisions to commit to the battle, how far north to push, etc.

But the Israelis are being squeezed between two relentless pressures. One is the desire to avoid taking too many casualties, and the other is the amount of time left to achieve even their minimal objectives. The less time, the more casualties -- and the more firepower that will have to be poured down to hold those casualties down. More firepower means more scenes of civilian death and devastation. (The Arab puppet regimes can see what's coming, which is probably why they all bailed today.)

But the end game remains stubbornly unclear. Or rather, what is being put forward as the official end game -- insertion of a force of NATO peacekeepers into the "buffer zone" -- is so outlandish it's hard to believe that the Israelis (the ultimate hard-eyed realists) believe it for a second. An ex-Mossad guy actually told my friend the Israeliis were optimistic that the EU would provide the troops. The EU!

So I explained to my friend that the EU manages a currency and writes standardized regulations for toaster safety and stuff like that. It doesn't do peacekeeping. If the Israelis want boots on the ground, they're going to have to go to the Germans and the Danes and the Poles and the French (yes, the cheese eating surrender monkeys) -- who are about as enthusiastic about the idea as they are about the spread of Mad Cow disease. Maybe less.


[Whiskey Bar]
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 03:07:13 AM EST
they seem to be "securing" the same objectives over and over again
How many times did the US military capture the city of Umn Qasr in March/April 2003?

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 03:57:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
From Billmon:
Revolt of the Puppets

The Cheney administration's Arab "allies" appear to have had enough of Condi's natural childbirth method. They're screaming for an epidural



Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 04:16:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The SISMi scandal continues to unfold. Yesterday it was revealed that Pirelli employed a CIA station chief formerly stationed in Mogadiscio, John Paul Spinelli. Pirelli and Telecom are closely linked through the same ownership. It appears that employees of Pirelli and Telecom may have been involved in the Abu Omar kidnapping, along with employees of Cipriani's private security companies. Cipriani received regular payments from Telecom for tens of millions of euros through a series of societies abroad.

Excerpts of Pio Pompa's intercepted phone calls indicate frequent and friendly conversations with Edward Luttwak of the Washington based CSIS. According to reports in the Repubblica, Luttwak was kept abreast of developments and probable disinformation campaigns in the Abu Omar kidnapping case.

Edward Luttwak is a regular fixture on Italian television as some sort of expert. He spent many years of his childhood in Italy as a refugee and speaks fluent Italian.

The CSIS has always been a favoured conduit for undercover operations and disinformation campaigns in Italy as well as South America. A favourite think tank of the Reagan and the Bush père administrations, it earned its brownie points with the Billygate scandal. That scandal tipped the scales in favour of Reagan.

by de Gondi (publiobestia aaaatttthotmaildaughtusual) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 03:26:30 AM EST
This has gone so far into spy movie land that I have trouble believing it!
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 03:30:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Italy has always been a great source of inspiration for script writers. Intrigue here exceeds imagination.
by de Gondi (publiobestia aaaatttthotmaildaughtusual) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 03:52:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
According to transcripts, Pio Pompa, Renato Farina and Giuliano Tavaroli were aware of Adamo Bove's activity and kept each other updated on Bove's progress as he collaborated with the Milan Procura in unravelling the SISMi involvement in the Abu Omar kidnapping.

It is not known if they were aware that Bove had also managed to discover them.

According to investigative hypotheses and Bove's brother's testimony, Adamo was very much disturbed by a disinformation campaign launched to frame him. Immediately after Bove's death, disinformation news items appeared as dispatches linking him to illegal wire-tapping.

by de Gondi (publiobestia aaaatttthotmaildaughtusual) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 03:47:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Guardian: The Thatcherite disdain for public employees lives on

. . . Almost nothing in the public sector now seems to work properly. Think of all those disastrous IT projects in health, passports, criminal records, benefits, defence and so on; of the failure of Gordon Brown's ingenious tax credits scheme to get the right amounts of money to the right people, so that £1 in every £10 goes to somebody who is not entitled to it; of how the ID-card scheme has already run into trouble; of how the health department, implementing a new pay regime, ended up giving doctors more than anyone intended; of the Home Office's blunders on foreign criminals and illegal migrants, which led the home secretary, John Reid, to announce an overhaul of its immigration department yesterday. These are just the most recent examples. . . .

I suspect that, over the past 25 years, public services have been afflicted by a new problem. They have simply not attracted people of dynamism, talent or initiative. Or, if they did, such qualities were quickly suppressed. . . .

It goes back to the Thatcher years. Why should any bright, ambitious young person at that time have joined the civil service, local government, the teaching profession, the NHS or any nationalised industry? . . .

If anything, New Labour has tightened the chains with its targets and performance indicators. The presumption remains that private-sector firms, or people recruited from them, will do most things better. The idea that there is such a thing as a public-service ethic is as unfashionable as ever. It is assumed to be a con, an attempt by entrenched "producers" to protect comfortable, unchallenging jobs. . . .

As any teacher knows, if you tell people often enough that they're no good, they will eventually be no good.  . . . Paradoxically, New Labour has ended up bringing out the worst in the public sector. . . .

by TGeraghty on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 04:05:39 AM EST
El Pais: It is very sad to tell the people who love you that you've been kicked in the face for being a faggot (26-07-2006)
The man assaulted at a Madrid swimming pool for kissing another has fractures in the face

Luis, 30, has half of his face broken: fracture of several bones on the left side and possibly affected jaw. Today he will be operated in a Madrid hospital, as a result of a kick he received last Saturday at the public swimming pool of La Elipa, in Moratalaz (Madrid). He was assaulted by a group of 10 youth, most minors, after kissing a dutch friend. They were called "faggots" and were told: "Sons of a bitch, you don't deserve to live!" and "your life is shit!". The couple had gone to the nudist solarium frequented by gay groups.



Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 04:36:53 AM EST
Breaking news - 12 Israeli soldiers killed today in South Lebanon

from news banner at www.foxnews.com

by manon (m@gmail.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 05:19:40 AM EST
banner has been changed to "At least 9 Israeli soldiers killed in South Lebanon"
by manon (m@gmail.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 05:30:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
from the London Times:

Israeli forces were reported to have taken heavy casualties this morning in the battle for control of a Hezbollah stronghold on the Lebanon border as Arab and Western foreign ministers gathered in Rome to discuss the crisis.

The Arabic television channel al-Jazeera said that nine Israeli soldiers were killed in clashes in the village of Bint Jbeil, while al-Arabiya, a rival channel, put the death toll at 12. Israeli military sources said that nine soldiers had been "hit" in heavy fighting, but gave no further details.

by manon (m@gmail.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 07:07:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Washington Post:

JERUSALEM, July 26 -- The Israeli army suffered heavy casualties Wednesday in its fierce battle to take the Hezbollah stronghold of Bint Jbeil in what has developed into the heaviest ground combat so far in a war now into its third week.

Arab news outlets reported the deaths of at least nine and as many as a dozen Israeli troops, numbers unconfirmed by Israeli officials, who did acknowledge significant casualties.

Bint Jbeil, we have been told several times over the last few days, has already been taken.

Seen on French public TV news last night: a "report" (read IDF photo-op) of how IDF "took" Bint Jbeil. Tanks drive along tracks in dusty countryside. Young Israelis in olive-green combat fatigues smile. One youngster, too young to be there, nice smile, neither macho nor muscular but even a bit goofy, the kind that makes you think this is just another very ordinary nice Israeli kid who's defending his country (which is of course what you're supposed to think, this is angelisation as opposed to demonisation) tells us:

(rough transcript from memory)

It's not easy fighting Hizbullah because they shoot at us from hiding. They daren't come out into the open because we'd walk all over them.

All this with a naive smile. The thrill of victory at Bint Jbeil. His togs weren't even dusty. He did look like a nice kid. I hope they kept him for the photo-ops and didn't send him into the real fighting at Bint Jbeil.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 08:06:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Hezbollah is wearing IDF uniforms so it has been reported that many of the IDF deaths were friendly-fire as they are shooting at each other
by manon (m@gmail.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 09:26:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Or perhaps they're just plain straight friendly fire.

That would have a certain (uncomfortable) symmetry about it.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 09:16:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Victory For Iraq Families

The families of British soldiers killed in Iraq have won a dramatic legal breakthrough in their attempt to force a full public inquiry into why Britain entered the conflict.

In what their lawyers described as "a stunning victory", the Court of Appeal has ruled they were entitled to apply for judicial review of the Government's refusal to hold an independent inquiry.

www.skynews.co.uk

no article is available yet

by manon (m@gmail.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 05:27:22 AM EST
Update from the BBC here.

"In particular, the government must finally explain how the 13-page equivocal advice from the Attorney General of March 7 2003 was changed within 10 days to a one-page completely unequivocal advice that an invasion would be legal."

The attorney general's office said: "At the full hearing, the government will continue to argue strongly that there is no legal merit in the applicants' case and that issues relating to the use of armed force are fundamentally matters for the elected government to decide, not for determination by the courts."

BBC home affairs correspondent Margaret Gilmore said the decision was a "small victory" and it was unlikely that the hearing would result in the families being given the full public inquiry that they seek.

Pretty useless argument from the AG. Does that mean that the elected government can do anything it wants with the armed forces with no legal consistency or oversight?

I'd hope any lawyer should be able to point out that there may perhaps be one or two minor problems with that line of reasoning.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 09:26:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Izzy, if you're still up or find it tomorrow: could you adopt Fran's system of ordering news under top-level comments naming a category? (e.g. "Europe", "World", "This and That", possibly "Middle East", whatever).

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 05:29:24 AM EST
Appreciation for today's quote though. That was definitely a good one. :)
by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 09:27:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]