Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.

Nancy Pelosi is painting the House GREEN ...

by a siegel Sat Mar 3rd, 2007 at 10:30:51 PM EST

Well, Democrats celebrate last November, expecting that Nancy Pelosi becoming Speaker presaged a cleaning up of the House. Not only a cleaning, but a redecorating. And, well, Nancy Pelosi has decided to redecorate GREEN.

Today, Pelosi sent a letter today to the Chief Administrative Officer of the House directing the 'greening of the Capitol' ...

Starting with her House, our House, Nancy is setting out on the path to Energize America toward a prosperous and sustainable energy future.


On 8 February, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi gave the opening speech to a Global Warming hearing and highlighted the implication of Democratic leadership for confronting global warming from a reality-based policy approach.

for twelve years, the leadership in the House of Representatives stifled all discussion and debate of global warming. That long rejection of reality is over, to the relief of Members on both sides of the aisle.

Yes!!! I can hear many saying. In fact, that short speech is worth a read, as it lays out cogently the obstacle of Bush Administration Global Warming Denial and, as well, the reality that we have in hand what we need to turn toward a better energy future, a prosperous energy future.

But, back to the <u>letter</u>.

In releasing it, the Speaker's blog (one of the bloggers, Karina), The Gavel states:

Addressing global warming and protecting the environment are vital to protecting the health of all Americans, particularly our children. For the sake of our future generations, America must provide strong leadership to reduce emissions that are responsible for global warming. Increasing use of renewable energy sources, including biofuels, and energy efficiency will help reduce emissions, protecting future generations from this global threat. And as they say, change starts at home.

Change starts at home ... Absolutely ...

So, let us turn to the letter she sent to the House's Chief Administrative Officer:

a critical initiative to address energy conservation, efficiency and cost savings for the U.S. Capitol and congressional office buildings.

Well, as a taxpayer, I celebrate. And, even relatively new buildings are often highly energy inefficient and, well, few Congressional buildings are new.  Walmart is spending $500 million a year on energy efficiency and renewable energy -- getting a two year payback on the investments. And, no Walmart store is as old as most Congressional offices are.  As a taxpayer, I'm thrilled that Nancy will be taking steps that will save us (US) money.

The House of Representatives should provide leadership to the nation in providing an environmentally responsible and healthy working environment for our employees.

Okay, the responsibility is not just to save money, but it is a responsibility to lead as well.  Let's not, Nancy is saying, hold a hearing on a blue-stained dress or direct restaurant signs say "Freedom Fries", but lets do something that makes our own home (House) work better as a symbol for the nation.  But, as a symbol of what?  Note the healthy working environment point. US Green Building Council (USGBC) Leadership in Environmental and Energy Design (LEED) certified buildings use far less energy and save on operating costs -- but they also have far lower absentee rates. Environmentally friendly buildings are also employee friendly, it seems.

We request that you, in conjunction with your Senate counterparts, undertake a "Green the Capitol" initiative to ensure that the House institutes the most up-to-date industry and government standards for green building and green operating procedures.

As someone who started his working career decades ago in Congressional offices and often goes back to the Hill (including for meetings re Energize America), I can promise you that they are far from up-to-date in terms of any reasonable standard.  Congress has more often exempted itself from any standard rather than met them.

This process should include recommendations for benchmarking existing conditions; setting meaningful and measurable goals; timetables for implementing various changes in operating conditions; and measures to report progress on a regular basis.

Benchmarking? Measurable goals? Timetables? Reporting?  What, is this going to be open and responsive governance? Are people going to be held accountable for performance? This is something absent from House for over 10 years. Hmm, why might that be the case? This is something that we haven't seen for awhile in Federal governance. (A Brownie, anyone?  Doing a good job, no?)

A preliminary report should be provided by April 30, 2007, with final recommendations submitted to us by June 30.

This is certainly not a long, drawn out process in Pelosi's mind.  Hopefully, top organizations like Rocky Mountain Institute and Southface will be brought in to help in the effort. And, back to the question of open governance, hopefully their reports and suggestions will be made public.

The Capitol complex should lead the nation in preserving our planet for future generations.
 

Well, the objective is not just for the Congressional buildings themselves ... not just for the United States ... not just for today ... this letter associates the actions within the House to global implications.  From the home to the globe ...

Pelosi is clearly saying that she intends to, that she intends the Democratic majority in the House to lead the way toward a better tomorrow.

Some say that a woman's place is in the house and, in this case, that is absolutely true.  Nancy is cleaning House. And when it comes to creating a better energy future, she is working from the House to the Globe.

Notes:

Display:
My question, fancying myself a big-league political strategist as I do, is this: Why are the Dems pissing away their opportunity to make nice with the Hallelujahs by not making this issue a huge part of the agenda?

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by Drew J Jones (pedobear@pennstatefootball.com) on Sun Mar 4th, 2007 at 06:09:55 AM EST
Actually, it is ... Pelosi is targeting having bills re energy to pass on 4th July (planning on having the House working that day????) to be able to call that "Energy Independence Day" ...

Blogging regularly at Get Energy Smart. NOW!!!
by a siegel (siegeadATgmailIGNORETHISdotPLEASEcom) on Sun Mar 4th, 2007 at 07:34:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That just nauseates me.  Why do it on the 4th of July, when we're all going to be drunk as shit launching excessive amounts of fireworks at random objects in our backyards?  Nobody will be paying attention.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by Drew J Jones (pedobear@pennstatefootball.com) on Sun Mar 4th, 2007 at 07:43:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
based approach.

How is the hypercar doing?  Is it true that the car company ultimately became a materials company because it, well, couldn't make cars?

Amory Lovins is a disgrace.

by NNadir on Sun Mar 4th, 2007 at 07:48:12 AM EST
You despise Amory because of his stance on / fight against nuclear power.

Hard for you to set that aside ... but doing so for a moment ... RMI (or SEI or ...) does not represent a good house for energy efficiency?

Blogging regularly at Get Energy Smart. NOW!!!

by a siegel (siegeadATgmailIGNORETHISdotPLEASEcom) on Tue Mar 6th, 2007 at 05:54:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Excellent news!  Now please delete the entire first phrase.

Our knowledge has surpassed our wisdom. -Charu Saxena.
by metavision on Sun Mar 4th, 2007 at 05:09:03 PM EST
Is it not clear that this is meant as sarcasm?

Note the ending: "Some say that a woman's place is in the house and, in this case, that is absolutely true.  Nancy is cleaning House. And when it comes to creating a better energy future, she is working from the House to the Globe."  

Blogging regularly at Get Energy Smart. NOW!!!

by a siegel (siegeadATgmailIGNORETHISdotPLEASEcom) on Sun Mar 4th, 2007 at 10:33:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No sarcasm.  A plain and simple, direct request.  I say what I mean and I mean what I say.

I read all the "green" pieces I can to stay up-to-date, though I focus less on words and more on my personal conservation efforts.  I find your attempt to appeal to some wider, consumerist public, which needs to be cajoled into the subject, a major block to reading your pieces.  Last time was an appeal to coolness through a brand name, this time a sexist cliché, to make the news about a woman in power, more palatable?

The cliche at the beginning made me come to a full, irritating stop before reading the rest.  The round-about ending is still more of the same, unnecessary nonsense and by no means justifies either.  Totally unrelated to the content.

Our knowledge has surpassed our wisdom. -Charu Saxena.

by metavision on Mon Mar 5th, 2007 at 08:50:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Okay ... the beginning did not work as intended (with you, Migeru, ..).

The ending, however, has been part of the political discussion within the United States, a celebratory part of it.  And, was part of the discussion prior to the election -- principally heard it from strong women (who were wearing broad smiles) ...

Sarcasm/snark -- e.g., it was/is my attempt to draw in readers with that opening, which utterly frustrated/angered you.  Got it. (And, I wasn't referring to you.)

And, at EuroTribune, don't need to worry about 'cajoling people' ... but, I seek to find paths to capture that 'wider, consumerist public' into moving toward a better path.   In the United States (and, Europe and elsewhere), there are many who need to be convinced/cajoled/etc toward reducing their energy footprint. If capturing them through 'a brand name' is

Blogging regularly at Get Energy Smart. NOW!!!

by a siegel (siegeadATgmailIGNORETHISdotPLEASEcom) on Tue Mar 6th, 2007 at 12:10:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Does the new opening work better for you?

Blogging regularly at Get Energy Smart. NOW!!!
by a siegel (siegeadATgmailIGNORETHISdotPLEASEcom) on Tue Mar 6th, 2007 at 12:14:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]