The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
by the stormy present Sat Jun 16th, 2007 at 01:49:23 PM EST
Why Can't the English? from My Fair Lady
Is there anyone who doesn't get insulted in this song?
Is anyone around to take offense at a little everyone-bashing? Probably not.
We better get good updates afterward, with lots of pictures, or... <shakes fist>
<salivates>
Gadgets. Good.
Does it work?
(dosn't stop my technology gland from salivating though) Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
Kinda expensive for an experiment, though.
I've laso avoided one of these for the same reason Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
Ahem... Surely you meant "poemless, Stormy and I will require." "Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
Besides, you and Stormy have been so good to me recently, I am on your side. "Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
&sorry I couldn't get the phone last night. I was busy breaking into my own apartment.... "Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
I mean, 1000 kilometres for a lunch! That is baaaad.... You can't be me, I'm taken
Via Americablog:
I never thought I'd have to be calling out Barack Obama for race-baiting, but here we are. And he's not race-baiting whites, or Asians, or even Latinos. No, the African-American Senator from Illinois is race-baiting dark-skinned people. (A bit like me race-baiting Mediterraneans.) I'd heard about this this morning - a memo that the Obama people were shopping around to the press - but didn't get the full story, or the full flavor of the story, until just a few minutes ago. I thought Obama was simply going after Hillary for supporting outsourcing of jobs, or for Hillary being supported by people who are in favor of outsourcing. And sure enough, the Obama memo talks a good deal about outsourcing, though in ways that do seem to skirt the line of racism or at least xenophobia (calling her "HILLARY CLINTON (D-PUNJAB)") and noting that "Hillary Clinton Accepted Almost $60,000 In Contributions From Employees Of Cisco Systems, Which Laid Off American Workers to Hire Indian 'Techies.'" (I was a bit uncomfortable with the use of the word "Indian" over and over and over again in the memo.) But I still wasn't sure that we had moved from outsourcing to racism until we hit the paragraph about all the money and support that Hillary has received from "Indian-Americans." Sure, the rest of the memo deals with how one of Hillary's top Indian-American supporters is allegedly a bit shady, and that's fair game, but the memo is about more than that. The memo is clearly trying to make the point that Hillary gets lots and lots of support from Indian-Americans, and apparently there's some kind of problem with that. I guess because their kin back home are stealing all of our good white jobs. (No word on whether they're sleeping with our women too.)
I'd heard about this this morning - a memo that the Obama people were shopping around to the press - but didn't get the full story, or the full flavor of the story, until just a few minutes ago. I thought Obama was simply going after Hillary for supporting outsourcing of jobs, or for Hillary being supported by people who are in favor of outsourcing. And sure enough, the Obama memo talks a good deal about outsourcing, though in ways that do seem to skirt the line of racism or at least xenophobia (calling her "HILLARY CLINTON (D-PUNJAB)") and noting that "Hillary Clinton Accepted Almost $60,000 In Contributions From Employees Of Cisco Systems, Which Laid Off American Workers to Hire Indian 'Techies.'" (I was a bit uncomfortable with the use of the word "Indian" over and over and over again in the memo.) But I still wasn't sure that we had moved from outsourcing to racism until we hit the paragraph about all the money and support that Hillary has received from "Indian-Americans." Sure, the rest of the memo deals with how one of Hillary's top Indian-American supporters is allegedly a bit shady, and that's fair game, but the memo is about more than that. The memo is clearly trying to make the point that Hillary gets lots and lots of support from Indian-Americans, and apparently there's some kind of problem with that. I guess because their kin back home are stealing all of our good white jobs. (No word on whether they're sleeping with our women too.)
The full text of the memo is here. (I know, it's the NYDN, but they published it all, whaddya want from me?)
Needless to say, the Indian-American community is fairly disgruntled, as well should they be. Hell, I'm pissed off about it, and I think everyone on the left should be.
From Sepia Mutiny:
So now the question is, how aware was Obama himself of the contents of this "anonymous" memo? If Obama doesn't distance himself from the memo immediately, this macaca is going to be sending his moolah to "Hillary Clinton, D-Punjab."
Aside from the utter stupidity of issuing such a transparently racist memo, what I also don't get is why being "too close to India" would be considered any kind of insult. It's not like saying she's too close to, for example, Osama Bin Laden. Who the fuck cares?
Honestly, when I first read about it, I assumed it might turn out to be another plant or fraud, like the whole Insight Magazine madrassa-gate thing. But it seems to be authentically a memo from the Obama campaign, handed out to traveling reporters by his campaign staff.
Pastor Dan over at Street Prophets has been pro-Obama in the past, and he's none too happy at this point:
This is really simple: Obama talks a good game, and now he needs to come through with the walk. Fire whoever wrote this memo, and apologize to Sen. Clinton and Indian-Americans. Otherwise, he's just another phony in an expensive suit calling on the name of Jesus when it meets his needs.
So there ya have it.
I just finished reading Seymour Hersh's latest at the New Yorker, also about Abu Ghraib. At the Pentagon, it just became a series of e-mails that Rumsfeld ignored. Banal indeed.
Don't fight forces, use them R. Buckminster Fuller.
About stars, I note that those real biggies aren't that big mass-wise: they are bloated red giants. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
It seems that while the media at the behest of the administration and the neo-cons is sowing seeds of fear and hatred in us, Mr. Cheney's old company, Halliburton is busy bidding for yet another project that has its foundations in blood. The United States is hard at work pushing for a NATO base to be built in the abandoned Kleiaat air base in Northern Lebanon, it claims, to fight al-Qaeda and other terrorists, presumably Hezbollah. Contenders for the billion dollar project, according to the Pentagon procurement office could be Bechtel and Halliburton and other contractors currently doing projects in Iraq. It is worthwhile noting that the late Prime Minister Harari opposed the base[vi]. AIPAC is pushing for it. Keeping Lebanon busy, will clear the way for war with Iran.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_soraya_s_070612_high_on_hate_3f.htm
My favorite Wayne Madsen genius-o-gram at the moment is his theory that the "Russian-Israeli mob-infested" Polish intelligence service actually killed Alexander Litvinenko because -- and this was his sole piece of "evidence" -- the killers used polonium, which is named after Poland.
I could not make this up if I tried.
Source. They've archived the original report here.
Regarding this latest article: If this lady knows so much about what's happening in Lebanon, why hasn't she figured out how to spell former Prime Minister Hariri's surname? She seems to have confused him with the capital of Zimbabwe, although she didn't get that quite right either....
by gmoke - Jun 19
by Oui - Jul 6 1 comment
by gmoke - Jun 24
by gmoke - Jun 22
by Oui - Jul 121 comment
by Oui - Jul 111 comment
by Oui - Jul 102 comments
by Oui - Jul 9
by Oui - Jul 7
by Oui - Jul 61 comment
by Oui - Jul 6
by Oui - Jul 5
by Oui - Jul 4
by Oui - Jul 2
by Oui - Jul 26 comments
by Oui - Jul 16 comments
by Oui - Jun 301 comment
by Oui - Jun 303 comments
by Oui - Jun 295 comments
by Oui - Jun 29
by Oui - Jun 28
by Oui - Jun 2810 comments
by Oui - Jun 27