Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.

Zim Elections: Here There Be Monsters

by Nomad Fri Mar 28th, 2008 at 07:29:30 AM EST

This Saturday, March 29, Zimbabweans will have another run to get rid of their country's largest plague: Robert Mugabe. That is probably the one sane thing I can write about this event. The rest, which I will try to boil down, spirals quickly into insanity. Whatever the outcome will be, there is a chance Zimbabwe will see change, one kind or another, for bad or for worse. All bets are rapidly losing their value - because the political landscape in Zimbabwe has undergone some changes.

The elections are both for president and parliament. I'll focus primarily on the presidential race - because I can't make heads or tails from the parliamentary one.


Promoted by Colman.



The Zimbabweans have four presidential candidates to choose from. We all know Bob. He has been in charge of the country since April 1980, when the country became independent, and he has been "winning" every held presidential election. As it is Zimbabwean policy that people should retire after holding a job for 25 years, Mugabe is only slightly overdue.

The largest opposition party, the MDC, came to the scene with a bang in the parliamentary elections in 2000 and took 57 of the 120 available seats (total of 150). Two years later, the MDC president, Morgan Tsvangirai, was the closest ever to defeating Mugabe, despite the fact that the odds were stacked against him and Mugabe was already rigging merrily away.


Tsvangirai

Sadly, the party irrecoverably split into two factions after the 2005 parliamentary elections - were the party lost seats, keeping only 41. The smaller faction is led by Arthur Mutambara and remains at odds with the bigger, Tsvangirai-led faction even today. Making matters worse, there has now appeared also a third faction campaigning specifically for parliamentary seats - fracturing the opposition party even further. Although Tsvangirai in all practical senses still leads the party, (perceived) splits do not help its stature. If it were just Tsvangirai, Mugabe wouldn't have much to worry about.

But it is the third presidential candidate, the dark horse, that is really spicing things up and whose name is on many persons' lips: Simba Makoni. What makes Makoni so interesting is because he has defected from Mugabe's Zanu PF party and announced his independent candidacy in a burst of international surprise - only early February this year. The groundswell since his announcement and during his ultra-short campaign time has been considerable.

Mugabe, after three weeks of total silence, has been frothing against Simba Makoni in his usual way. The standard accusations have been flying: he's a western pawn to bring ruin to Zimbabwe! Not sure if that worked - the country is in ruins already and everyone but Mugabe and cronies seem to know this. He has compared Makoni to a prostitute. Same old, same old.


Makoni

Makoni has historically also been at odds with Mugabe - he left his government position of Finance minister in 2002 after a row over financial policy directions. That gives him some, not many, points in my book. More importantly: he has captured the people's imagination - also the crucially important rural areas. The little anecdotal evidence I have also points at this direction. He has the looks too and is apparently the only candidate who can dress. He's further backed by the small Mutambara faction of the MDC, but has received the endorsement of only a few, and lightweights at that, of the Zanu PF party. On the other side, some tongues are wagging that he's there to split up the opposition vote (as if the MDC isn't doing a stellar job on that), or that he's a pretender to ensure Zanu PF keeps in power. I've seen no indications of either.

The fourth candidate, another independent, is so unknown to me that I only found about him just as I was reading up. I only have his name: Langton Toungana.

The presidential election is a two tier race: if no candidate gets an absolute majority, a second round of voting will be needed. A second round would be Mugabe's ultimate nightmare - I'm pretty sure Mugabe will give his very worst to make certain the second round will never happen.

But what will really happen is anyone's guess at this point. Hope has long left the country: people are waiting "for the king to die". The one commodity that remains left for Zimbabweans is their sense of humour.

The array of tricks by Mugabe's Zanu PF to block and disrupt political rallies are being documented, as best as people can, at Sokwanele. Food droppings are again in swing (with thanks to the WFP?) - a well honed trick by Zanu PF to buy their voters and threaten opposition voters with starvation - although it may not work as well as it used to because, as said, the economic ruin is almost complete. Even while there is less violence reported compared to 2002 and 2005, intimidation and convoluted voter registration have been observed by Human Rights Watch. On the upside is that the rejection of the Zanu PF by the Zimbabweans has become more and more open:

The Zimbabwe Situation

"Who are they (Tsvangirai and Makoni) to  say Mugabe should go? What
did they do for Zimbabwe? Nhapwa zvadzo dzinosveta ropa dzakatumwa
nemuvengi. That is what Makoni and Tsvangirai are doing," Msika said,
likening them to ticks sucking the blood of their host.
This was  followed by a deafening silence from the villagers.
While admitting that "we are going through hard times", Msika said it
was not possible to change leaders.
"Changing of leadership like the way we change our shirts is a luxury
we cannot afford . . . Do not vote sellouts, renegades and puppies."
He blamed all the economic hardships on Britain, America, and the
International Monetary Fund which he said had withdrawn their credit
facilities.
But before Msika could conclude his speech, incensed villagers walked
off in protest. They told The Standard they could no longer afford to wait
to hear "such lies" when they had to do chores "to  fend for our children".
"These are the same old Zanu PF lies. They shift the blame onto others
yet they are responsible for the ruin of this country," villagers said.
"We don't eat sovereignty. We know the liberation war history; we do
not need to be told that. We want to hear how they are going to mend things
if we vote for them again."

Even while it is remarkable these things are expressed in the open - in a political climate that has been historically deadly for dissident opinions - Mugabe has been rejected for already a long time and he has still won every single time. This week, the MDC claimed the order had been given to print some 3 million unnecessary ballots:

The Zimbabwe Situation

Tsvangirai said they had information that ZEC had ordered nine
million ballot papers for each of the elections, despite the fact that ZEC
had announced only 5.9 million people had registered to vote.
Tsvangirai showed journalists a letter allegedly written by ZEC,
asking the printers to print the postal ballot papers.
"What we are witnessing is an attempt by Zanu PF and Robert Mugabe to
try and rig the elections," said Tsvangirai. "Uniformed forces, including
the Zimbabwe Defence Forces, the police and prison services are not more
that 100 000 when combined."
"We don't have any forces on duty in foreign lands. The diplomatic
community has also shrunk dramatically over the years. So who does ZEC want
to give the 600 000 postal ballots to?"

With 5.9 million voters, 3 million extra votes would guarantee an absolute winner. Obviously Zanu PF immediately denied the allegation and then proceeded to arrest the South African pilot that was meant to fly Tsvangirai through the country in a chopper - because proper roads to the rural areas have long deteriorated. The truth of the matter? I can't help you.

Then there is gerrymandering and there is an acute shortage of polling stations for the cities (dominantly anti-Mugabe). Perhaps the dead will vote, too. Mugabe is dealing the chips - anything goes.

A latest poll that was floating on the internet has Tsvangirai in the lead and Makoni at a disappointing 8 - 9 %. Whoever did the poll is a mystery to me, and so is its reliability. There are analysts who argue the case that the board has changed. The split in Zanu PF is now in the open and even with a Mugabe win, he will have to deal with a new dynamic.

There are perhaps two more issues to consider. Firstly, ethnicity - a hidden elephant in a lot of what is reported about Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe is no different than many other African nations whose borders have been designated by the colonial powers - effectively lumping several major ethnicities together. For Zimbabwe, these are the Shona and the Ndebele people - the latter being a people who branched off from the Zulu during Shaka's rule. Mugabe is Shona. Things are further complicated by the fact that the Shona are split up in powerful clans, of which the largest ones, the Karanga and the Zezuru clans, practically dominate the executive at several levels. There are tensions between those clans, but the Ndebele people have been marginalized the most during Mugabe's long reign.

Secondly, a large wildcard in all of this, is the military. Most of the brass, well cushioned by Mugabe, still backs Mugabe, and the generals have openly declared that if anyone else than Mugabe will win, the Constitution will be set aside - effectively implying a coup. The soldiers, whose salaries were recently boosted to 1.5 billion Zim dollars (that is, some 60 USD baring no further inflation) per month, are reportedly less impressed. But put this in the mix, and speculations on a next "Kenya" are already thriving.

We will see the outcome of all these speculations, because I don't view them as much more, in some 48 hours from now.

Display:
Quite a lot of material for a hasty job!
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Thu Mar 27th, 2008 at 09:57:35 PM EST
Zim elections: And the winner is ... : Mail & Guardian Online
Four scenarios confront Zimbabweans as they prepare to go to the polls at the weekend: a Robert Mugabe victory, the most likely outcome; a second round of voting; a victory for the majority faction of the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) under Morgan Tsvangirai; and a disputed election.

Scenario 1: Mugabe wins
If Mugabe wins a sixth presidential term it will not be more of the same for ordinary Zimbabweans: it will be much worse.

<...>
Scenario 2: A run-off
Mugabe will do everything in his power to avoid a second round of voting if he fails to win an overall majority, as this would force the opposition to present a united front. Spurred on by the fact that their votes may bring change, opposition voters could mount a major offensive.

But they will pay a high price. Bloodshed is predicted during the 21-day hiatus required before a second round of voting.

<...>

Scenario 3: Tsvangirai wins
This is the least-likely scenario, thanks to the institutional impediments in the MDC's way.

Constituency borders have been gerrymandered to favour Zanu-PF and the number of urban polling stations restricted, giving each voter nine seconds to make a choice.

<...>
Scenario 4: Disputed election
If Mugabe wins in disputed circumstances -- the most likely outcome -- Zimbabwe is unikely to follow Kenya's lead by undergoing weeks of crippling post-election violence.

Mugabe has threatened to quell any violence that may attend his re-election and neither the opposition nor dissidents in Zanu-PF are sufficiently strong or organised to offer significant resistance.

IOL: Mugabe tipped to win

A new poll gives Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe 56 percent of the vote in this weekend's national election, Harare's Herald newspaper reported on Friday.

The survey indicated that the ruling Zanu-PF party would probably clinch 41 Senate seats and 137 House of Assembly constituencies.

Note that the Herald is in Mugabe's pocket.

by Nomad (Bjinse) on Fri Mar 28th, 2008 at 05:21:56 AM EST
I have a question to readers - whether Mugabe's charges about white conspiracy to ruin Zimbabwe economy justified or not?

I have some doubts about BBC coverage of Zimbabwe problems but unfortunately it is only source of information. How South African press, especially linked to ANC, analyze political situation in Zimbabwe?

So far I had impression that Mugabe is quite typical for developing countries freedom fighter turned despot, whether he is deserved remarks that he is Zimbabwe's plague are not clear to me yet. Maybe I am mistaken but till now he was proved to be inneficient administrator incompetent in economical matters but about his brutality - Tsvingarai is still free not behind the bars.

Many regimes do not tolerate opposition and quite tough, take Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore, Indonesia, and so many other countries especially in Africa for example.

Tsvingarai is said to be divisive figure. Why?

Makoni provides fresh face in the race which is welcome sign but how good are his credentials both in economy and democracy?

Overall, thank you for good analysis.

by FarEasterner on Fri Mar 28th, 2008 at 05:33:31 AM EST
Your questions are sufficient to set off another diary.

I've detailed some findings of Mugabe's policy in a previous diary, here - which I now see you've read.

As for his brutality, there is no way I could list. Just google. There are dozens and dozens of reported cases, and hundreds and hundreds of unreported ones.

The Zimbabwe Situation

The soldiers raided the hospital looking for those they had injured during a week of violence and to try to stop journalists from photographing their handiwork.

 
An alleged victim of beatings by Mugabe's security forces

Zimbabwe's Association of Doctors for Human Rights said yesterday: "At least one injured patient was forcibly abducted by uniformed police from a hospital casualty waiting area in Harare, without receiving medical attention."

On Monday, hours before the opposition Movement for Democratic Change's week-long strike against the brutal dictatorship of Robert Mugabe began, eight soldiers dragged Mr Matika from his bed at home and systematically beat him.

"The soldiers, in camouflage, picked me up, shouted that I wanted to remove Mugabe, and then pushed their rifle butts into one side of my body," he said.

When the thugs had finished he had two broken ribs, a broken arm, extensive injuries inside his mouth, and deep bruising. His three brothers escaped attack by hiding in wardrobes in the middle-class family's home in the Highfields township, close to the city centre.

The soldiers flung Mr Matika and the family's gardener into an army truck filled with more than 100 other groaning youths, and took them to the Machipisa police station on the outskirts of the city.

Amnesty International:

Amnesty International Report 2007 * Zimbabwe

All 15 were reportedly tortured in custody at Matapi police station on 13 September. They were transferred to Harare Central Police Station on 14 September and released. Medical reports confirmed that they had injuries consistent with beatings with blunt objects, heavy enough to cause fractures to hands and arms, and severe multiple soft tissue injuries to the backs of the head, shoulders, arms, buttocks and thighs. The doctors also stated that eight of the activists had injuries consistent with the torture method called falanga (beatings on the soles of the feet), which can cause permanent problems with walking. The beatings were so severe that Lucia Matibenga had one of her ear drums perforated as a result.

Mugabe's veterans love for torturing people with bicycle spokes was the vogue in 2002.

The Zimbabwe Situation

James Nevana, 32, was a polling agent for the opposition party, the Movement
for Democratic Change (MDC) in the remote Gokwe East constituency. After
Mugabe was declared the winner on 13 March, Nevana was abducted by Mugabe's
youth militia and tortured at one of their 'Taliban camps'. His genitals
were repeatedly pierced by a bicycle spoke, rupturing one of his testicles,
and he was forced to drink a poison which is causing him terrible stomach
pains. He was admitted to hospital on Friday.

And it goes way back to the early 80s - ever read about the Gukurahundi massacre? I've heard anecdotal stories that Mugabe's war veterans were enjoying cutting open pregnant women.

I weary of this. Terror is a far more effective tool than prisons. You'd need to feed people in prison; there isn't any food.

I may have some time later for your other points but please, there's no need to question Mugabe's ruthlessness.

by Nomad (Bjinse) on Fri Mar 28th, 2008 at 06:21:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Zimbabwe has an inflation rate somewhere in the hundred thousands, an economy that declined 40% in the last 8 years, and a much-diminished population now that 3 to 4 million have fled the country (mainly to South Africa).

I though Iraq had the worst refugee problem in the world, but actually, Zimbabwe gives it a good run.

Attributing this to a white conspiracy has the usual problem of positing an all-powerful conspiracy and a government unable to respond.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Fri Mar 28th, 2008 at 06:59:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
whether Mugabe's charges about white conspiracy to ruin Zimbabwe economy justified or not?

Kinda depends what your view is on Mugabe's economic policy. Were you to agree that Mugabe is only incompetent and genuinely interested to better the fate of the Zimbabwean people, you'd entertain the thought that the sanctions and travel bans levelled at Mugabe and Zimbabwe could be viewed as a white conspiracy. I don't. We discuss economy a lot on ET yet even I can see that Mugabe is ideologically blinded for every economic reality - his financial policies go beyond foolish, his corruption and cronyism have well been documented and his greed is colossal.

How South African press, especially linked to ANC, analyze political situation in Zimbabwe?

I don't really understand the question. SA press linked to the ANC? If you'd mean closely affiliated, the public broadcaster SABC would be the closest thing to it. But I've stopped watching television for months now in this country. The television news feed only manages to agonize me with its shallowness and sensationalism.

Your question is interesting however, because I've not gone much into the role the SADC and Mbeki have continued to play in the preparations leading towards this election.

Tsvingarai is said to be divisive figure. Why?

Makoni provides fresh face in the race which is welcome sign but how good are his credentials both in economy and democracy?

Who's saying Tsvingarai is divisive? Do you think so, or is it someone else who says this?

Of Makoni's credentials I know very little; he's as much a new face to me as many. Two months ago I didn't even know about him.

by Nomad (Bjinse) on Fri Mar 28th, 2008 at 02:09:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Thank you for answers.

I meant SA commentators linked to ANC - it was interesting to know how Mugabe is rated among fellows. Why Mandela is silent? The world doesn't know much about Zimbabwean politics and Mugabe is skillfully using his reputation of freedom fighter etc. In fact if you noticed rare statements about Mugabe from politicians of other countries, for example EU leaders in run-up to EU-African summit they were almost apologetic. Why didn't EU leaders follow Brown in boycotting this summit?

Tsvingarai is called deeply divisive figure by BBC and CNN. His party suffered split but why he is detested by some in opposition it's not clear for me.

by FarEasterner on Sat Mar 29th, 2008 at 01:09:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The world doesn't know much about Zimbabwean politics and Mugabe is skillfully using his reputation of freedom fighter etc. In fact if you noticed rare statements about Mugabe from politicians of other countries, for example EU leaders in run-up to EU-African summit they were almost apologetic. Why didn't EU leaders follow Brown in boycotting this summit?

I understand better what you say - and it is a puzzling question for many, including myself. I think for starters you'd need to understand the African concept of >Ubuntu (not the computer OS).

I'm however more and more leaning to the idea that government for the African people is only in its infancy: psychologically a lot of the countries on this continent are still wrestling with the centuries of colonial imprinting and domination. Many leaders of today were the children growing up after the Wind of Change - but the western domination and teachings of racial inferiority do not die overnight. South Africa and Zimbabwe are even more extreme examples with the apartheid regimes, so I try to scale it down for the rest of the continent. But I've tried to apply what I observe here to other countries, so a lot of what I write is pure speculation on my part.

I suspect pride comes in as well - still under restoration. People may object to this - but despite the years and years pride and confidence of the African people in the face of white governments is not as it should be. Despite everything, despite all voices in Africa saying that they're equal - it does not show in their political behaviour. Some will overcompensate, some will deny anything is wrong.

Likewise, I don't think that white governments have entirely let go of colonial thinking, either. It's very blunt and without nuance, but there you go.

On Tsvangirai's alleged divisiveness I've little to contribute - my personal impression is that, with his past background as representative of union workers, he sounds as a tough negotiator with an iron will. Mugabe's police beat the shit out of him in March 2007 - he's still standing. You'd need to have a serious backbone for what he's doing - so perhaps he leads as a captain on the ship: my way or the highway. But again, these are simply my speculations for what they're worth.

by Nomad (Bjinse) on Sat Mar 29th, 2008 at 05:00:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What I don't understand is why everyone insists on writing about Zimbabwean elections as if they're real elections where the result will reflect anything like the intention of the voters.  I think the process Zimbabwe is about to endure should be referred to as an "election," with quotation marks to distinguish it from the kind where the outcome is actually in doubt.

I was in Zimbabwe for several elections, and have never seen such blatant fraud, never mind the voter intimidation and violence.  I mean honestly, it doesn't even really rise to the level of charade.  The entire system is rigged, from front to back and top to bottom.  They have made a science of election-rigging.  Every last detail is covered.  There is no room for ambiguity.  Zanu-PF does not lose.

The only thing I can surmise in this one is that people suspect (hope?) that large sections of the party apparatus through which Mugabe has rigged the last three elections may actually like Makoni more than Mugabe and won't cheat as enthusiastically.

Wishful thinking, if you ask me.

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Fri Mar 28th, 2008 at 05:56:54 AM EST
Have you ever heard of Joris Luyendijk?

NLPVF:: Joris Luyendijk: Almost Human (Het zijn net mensen)

Another filter is language. The story of the Middle East is told in words borrowed from western democracies, words like `elections', `parliament', `political parties', but these terms are simply meaningless in a dictatorship. In Israel yet other filters apply; correspondents there encounter an extremely well-oiled propaganda machine. Luyendijk gives several disconcerting examples.

The picture that Luyendijk sketches is sombre: reliable journalism is simply impossible in dictatorships like those of the Middle East. But he describes all this very enjoyably, with humour, extremely accessibly, and without sparing himself. Journalists ought more often to admit there are things they do not know, Luyendijk says, rather than bluffing or giving the impression that, on the basis of their own observations, they can say exactly how things stand.

I've been wanting to discuss his angle for a while now, but was waiting for an English translation of his book.

by Nomad (Bjinse) on Fri Mar 28th, 2008 at 06:56:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I still continue to be shocked by such extreme and blatant human rights violations.  For what it is worth there will be a demonstration in Cardiff tomorrow.

This Saturday the 29th of March, Zimbabwe is holding its national Presidential elections once again. ZDSA Wales, in collaboration with Zimbabweans worldwide is demonstrating against continual electoral rigging, inhumane treatment of fellow Zimbabweans and utmost poverty of the masses under the Mugabe regime.
Zimbabweans in the diaspora have been stripped of their rights to vote in order to influence change in their own country.

-There is an average of 600 Zimbabweans living in Wales.
It is estimated half of them have been rendered destitute in the asylum process since 2002 and cannot be returned home due to the political situation.
-A high number of Zimbabweans have been living in limbo for more than 5 years with no light at the end of the tunnel since deportation was suspended in 2002.
-Mugabe's repressive tyranny in the past of 27 years has brought the country to its knees.
-In Zimbabwe the average person lives in abject poverty with the highest inflation rate in the world
Life expectancy of the average Zimbabwean male and female is now 32 years.

Shocking facts in that. I don't know how to process it.

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Fri Mar 28th, 2008 at 07:36:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Sounds like a lovely guy.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by Drew J Jones (pedobear@pennstatefootball.com) on Fri Mar 28th, 2008 at 08:35:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Very interesting stuff, Nomad.  I'm surprised there hasn't been any polling done by the British firms, since the papers over there seem to be paying a good bit of attention to this.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by Drew J Jones (pedobear@pennstatefootball.com) on Fri Mar 28th, 2008 at 08:56:03 AM EST
British firms? Polling? In Zim?

Were I to pull numbers from my smelly socks, I could as well hand you a better representation.

I verified the polls (all two of them) that I know to be available: the one I quoted upthread comes from research of the University of Zimbabwe. It was quoted in the Herald because it had Mugabe ahead.

The second poll, from the same university, has Tsvangirai ahead with some 28%, Mugabe at 20% and Makoni at 14%, leaving over 35% unwilling to answer. No link - I read it in a paper version of The Star (SA newspaper).

I adhere very little value to these polls. I think it more likely we'll not even come close to know what the numbers could be. It's the old dictatorship joke: "Honourable X, you've once again gloriously won the election with 99.9% of the votes! What more would you want?"
"The names of the 0.1%."

by Nomad (Bjinse) on Fri Mar 28th, 2008 at 01:45:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks for doing this nomad.

She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre
by ATinNM on Fri Mar 28th, 2008 at 11:57:09 PM EST
Thanks for a great diary, Nomad.  Zimbabwe seems to be a terrible case of post colonial guilt and angst gone wrong.  The situation is close to genocide, and yet no one does anything because Zimbabwe doesn't have Oil and because they don't want to reprise the sad history of colonialism there.  

Rabid racist that he was, Ian Smith was never responsible for death and destruction of even a small fraction of the people who have died, starved or suffered huge deprivation under Mugabe.  Even South Africa sits idly by, despite having to deal with millions of refugees, because it doesn't want to have to deal with the uncomfortable fact that Zimbabwe is a failed state, and that Black majority rule has been even worse than what it replaced.

I don't know what the answer is - certainly not a return to a neo-colonial form of rule, and UN mandates  and foreign interventions have a very chequered history.  Perhaps, in the end, the Zimbabwean people will sort this out for themselves.  But they will have paid a terrible price for having to do so.  Europe had to learn the hard way as well, the the US is still learning...

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Sat Mar 29th, 2008 at 05:58:09 AM EST
It's not 'black majority rule' when an you have an authoritarian clique running an oppressive government.
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Sat Mar 29th, 2008 at 11:41:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Mugabe came to power to huge international acclaim and democratic support as a liberator from colonial oppression and with an explicit black majority rule policy and mandate.  Obviously something has gone very wrong since then - but the excuse that its all colonialism's fault is wearing pretty thin.  The rest of the world doesn't give a shit, but any honest appraisal of what went wrong has to include an analysis of how a revolutionary change isn't always for the better.  

You can't roll back the clock, but you do have to learn from your mistakes, and in this case they have been made by what was once a very broadly defined movement for black majority rule.  A black dictatorship - as Idi Amin also proved - can be even worse than a white colonial dictatorship. So we have to get out of the racist mindset, from either perspective, and look at how the processes of Government were degraded - regardless of who did the degrading - and how they might be improved in the future.

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Sun Mar 30th, 2008 at 09:22:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
For Western observers there are many puzzling aspects about Zimbabwe (and to some extent Southern Africa in general) and some have come up here. I'll try to address them, perhaps obliquely.

The first thing to remember is that the pace of life is dramatically different, despite life expectancy being so low. To get some understanding, I often jokingly contrast the attitude to time with the old Spanish concept of doing something "Manana". For many Africans, that would indicate an indecent haste. The clock is flexible. The train may be hours late, but it'll turn up. In terms of Zimbabwe, the old man is 84, he'll die. Change will happen.

The second facet to remember is the intense role of religion and particularly the Christian church. Think of the old priest-ridden Ireland but on steroids. Prayer is common and open. On a long distance bus journey, the hostess or driver may lead a prayer for a safe journey. Part of the old colonial method of control were the missionaries who taught that patience and suffering on Earth would be rewarded in Heaven. Ally to that the old English class belief, also promoted by the church, of "knowing your place". More recently the Evangelical churches have been preaching the power of prayer to get rewards on Earth - which works if you are the preacher getting contributions from a gullible congregation. Their wealth is not a sign of corruption, it is confirmation of their teaching.  Providing you pray sincerely and correctly, you will be rewarded.

I am trying not to be too judgemental or painting too broad a brush but these are the sorts of themes that inform why the Zimbabweans have an apparently illogical belief that corrupt elections will bring about real change. Change may not happen this time but Mugabe will not be around forever.

by libdemfop on Tue Apr 1st, 2008 at 06:37:27 AM EST


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]