Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.

Wikileaks: Eastern Afghanistan is Talibanland?

by fairleft Mon Jul 26th, 2010 at 07:47:06 PM EST

Wikileaks' Afghanistan revelations ain't much, as far as I and others can tell (look here for multiple links on the story). Much ado, but little if any new there there. Andrew Weinstein has one of the most knowledgeable takes, by the way. So, yeah, the U.S. has a secret task force designed to kill senior Talban which accidentally but by design kills lots of civilians, the U.S. generally kills a lot of civilians, the war has been going badly for us (and well for 'them') especially since mid-2007, and Pakistan military/intelligence has long helped the Afghan Taliban, but didn't anyone paying average attention already sort of more or less know that stuff?

Not entirely new, but 'newish' with an on-the-ground perspective is Losing the east in Afghanistan, by Aljazeera's Gregg Carlstrom, which focuses on 'deteriorating' (or is it 'increasingly liberated'?) eastern Afghanistan and the role of Jalaluddin Haqqani's forces in making that happen:

One trend clearly on display in the release by Wikileaks of 90,000 secret US military records is the slow and steady deterioration of security in eastern Afghanistan.

The worsening situation in the east has been clear for months - long before the documents were leaked.

Provinces like Khost, Paktia, Logar and Nangarhar have been caught in the crossfire between Nato troops and the so-called Haqqani network, a Taliban group. . . .

The leaked reports . . . chart the ascent of the Haqqani network, whose rise brought about much of the insecurity in the east.

Haqqani was scarcely mentioned during the early years of the war. . . .

Now we know why Jalaluddin Haqqani, leader of the Haqqani network, started smiling.

[It] remains a minor concern until the summer of 2006.

Then it quickly became a major concern for Nato.

The following strongly indicates the control the Taliban has over Eastern Afghanistan. Official 'government' posts simply can't compete in power terms with similar positions in the Taliban 'government':

Afghan intelligence officials began warning that former members of the Taliban who had made reconciliation deals with the government were being lured back to the insurgency.

"[They] were unable to achieve the personal and political power they held under the Taliban," said Mohammad Nawab, an interior ministry official, in a December 2006 meeting with Nato commanders.

"They said that the former commanders were easily tempted by [Gulbuddin] Hekmatyar [the founder of Hezb-i-Islami, a Taliban group] and Haqqani, who offered money, power and prestige."


Carlstrom provides figures showing the dramatic long-term rise in violence directed at the occupiers (sorry if that isn't the politically correct term) in the Eastern provinces:

There were 147 attacks in Khost province in the first quarter of 2010, up from just 41 in the same period in 2007.

Violence in other provinces increased exponentially as well: Kunar, from 66 attacks to 312; Nangarhar, from 38 to 76.

Ghazni, which had just 4 insurgent attacks in the first quarter of 2007, had 71 in 2010.

Well, there are those portable heat-seeking missiles which Wikileaks reveals that the Taliban has, a fact the Obama admin has been trying to cover up.

Justin Raimondo properly focuses on the sheer number of tragic reports on civilian after civilian killed by us. Go to the original for the numerous links:

A good number of the incident reports are those that detail civilian casualties, which don't seem to have been reported by our own "embedded journalists": the title of this one, "Five in car, including toddler, machine-gunned by patrol," is typical of what the reader has in store. Here's another: "Special forces wound two, kill six, including young girl, plus donkey and chickens." There are hundreds of such reports, detailing slaughters both horrifying ("56 civilians killed in NATO bombing") and pathetic ("Practice shell kills child and 10 sheep, injures shepherd").



by fairleft (fairleftatyahoodotcom) on Mon Jul 26th, 2010 at 07:55:13 PM EST
I'm surprised they just describe 3 small provinces right on the Pakistan border as being lost. Given the number and range of incidents across the whole country I'd have thought that practically everywhere apart from possibly those on the northern border were as good as gone anyway.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Jul 27th, 2010 at 11:10:46 AM EST
I think the Aljazeera report is focusing on the rise of Haqqani, and wasn't meant to comment on the rest of Afghanistan. As a reporter, you're confronted with so much information in those Wikileaks, so that was a sensible approach.

by fairleft (fairleftatyahoodotcom) on Tue Jul 27th, 2010 at 12:29:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]