by Frank Schnittger
Tue Aug 2nd, 2011 at 05:47:39 AM EST
Three independent members of parliament have now withdrawn their support for the nomination of David Norris to run for President. He needed 20 nominators and now is down from 15 to at best 12. Other supporters have gone to ground, and most of his campaign staff have resigned. Besides giving one interview to the Sunday Independent, the normally voluble David Norris is nowhere to be seen. Joe Jackson, author of an otherwise sympathetic book David Norris, Trial by Media says he knows of other scandals waiting in the wings. It is not looking good for him.
I have very mixed feelings about my letter to the Editor (below the fold) being published. As usual, the Irish Independent have edited out the argument and printed only the conclusion. I actually surprised myself with my own conclusion in this case. Normally I am pig stubborn and will hold my position to the end. David Norris would be a good President for many and a divisive figure for others. That's not always a bad thing, even in a largely ceremonial Presidency.
But I know David Norris slightly and have always been amazed that he should have considered himself a viable candidate for the Presidency. Nothing to do with his sexuality, and everything to do with the narrow cultural niche he occupies in Irish society as a representative of what is still perceived to be a rather elitist university. Trinity College Dublin graduates still elect three senators to the Senate - a legacy of the time when it was an almost wholly protestant institution and there was a desire to include protestants in the newly independent Irish state.
I suppose the bottom line is that I don't think he will be elected, even if he still manages to secure a nomination. He could do well on first preferences, but not achieve the lower preferences required to bring himself up to the 50% of the vote needed to win in a single seat constituency election.
So the question becomes: will he do more harm than good to his cause by competing and losing, or withdrawing now with dignity. I have no problem with fighting a battle and losing - it seems to be the story of my life - but in this case my judgment, FWIW, and it is a finely balanced decision - would be that it would be for the best that he withdraw now.
What is remarkable is the affection in which Norris is held even by conservative Catholics, considering he once called Pope John Paul II an "instrument of evil" and Cardinal Ratzinger a Nazi. Perhaps, given what has been revealed since in terms of Vatican cover-ups of child sexual abuse, public opinion is finally catching up with him.
Some will put this controversy down to a Zionist conspiracy. Many others will put it down to homophobia: that if Norris or his former partner had been heterosexuals, this wouldn't have gained such prominence. But there have been gay ministers in Government before, and there is at least one in Government now, and it has rarely been an issue. I have no doubt there will be LGBT Ministers and perhaps Presidents in the future. Their campaigns will simply not be built around their sexual orientation.
And perhaps that is how it should be.
Past struggles hint at future problems - Letters, Opinion - Independent.ie
If we were to go back 15 years, which of us hasn't said and done things we now regret -- especially in defence of a loved one, or over a bottle of wine?The question is: should a different standard be applied to potential heads of state who are supposed to be wise and popular figures that a large majority of people can identify with and be proud to have representing them abroad?
While I would have very much wanted a President who could have continued to push the boundaries of tolerance and acceptance towards those previously discriminated against, I am now reluctantly coming to the conclusion that Mr Norris is a man of great past struggles rather than a representative figure for the future.
Frank Schnittger