Oikofoby? Boreaal? Immanent? Words used by Owl Baudet | AD - Dutch |

"And that's how we stand here. Tonight, at the eleventh hour, literally. Amid the debris of what was once the most beautiful, greatest civilization the world has ever known. A civilization that covered all corners of the world, which was full of confidence. And who has produced the most beautiful architecture, the most beautiful music and the most beautiful painting that ever existed under the starry sky. Our country is part of that civilization family. But just like those other countries of that boreal world, we are being destroyed by people who should protect us."

More Trumpian language, nothing original to be detected ...

"We are undermined by our universities, our journalists, by the people who receive our art grants and who design our buildings. And above all, we are undermined by our directors. A clique, a clique of networkers, professional meetings, people who have never read a book in their lives, and who have no idea what the important issues are in the longer term. Unfortunately, they control the decision-making bodies of our country and make the wrong choices time and time again in a curious mix of ignorance and cynical self-interest. Not for long!"

For what reason does Baudet use the term "Boreal"? Any suggestions ...

○ The restoration of the Boreal Crown might result in the downfall of Civilization and the triumph of Harmony
○ The New Dutch Disease Is White Nationalism | Foreign Policy |

In the ancient Indian language of Sanskrit, swastika means "well-being"...

'Sapere aude'

I'm just climbing out of the sewer of European history (in the innerboobs), 1594-1740 --at which point the several Great Wakenings, appending international war in the Americas, preoccupies well-worn, parochial knowledge of colonial history.

I took on the mission, when claims by descendants of the "Irish" persuasion to "white slavery" in the period came to my attention: 50,000 [CITATION NEEDED] sold down the river, so to speak, called the Atlantic, or "Oceana". Over the weekend I have become more familiar with competing historiography and oral tradition [eg. Uliad Cycle] in the period. It is a most contentious era in terms of international sectarian warfare and duplicity --which contemporary ahh certain "social historians" are unwilling or unable to synthesize thoughtfully.

Who knew that Sephardic Jews, for example, emigrating from Holland were as prominent a cohort of beneficiaries of torrid English civil wars as the Scots-Irish and English --Catholic and Puritan-- peerage slicing the "West Indies" into "patents"?

Two essays in particular, "Beyond the Seas: Eighteenth-Century Convict Transportation and the Widening Net of Penal Sanctions" and "Cromwellian Language of Empire" come to mind in this search for one explanation (there isn't one) of capital formation that weakly informs public discourse on "race" and iniquity today.

The first provides in excruciating detail the evolution of juridical reasoning for penal code and sentencing across "the three kingdoms" (which funnel the poor from waste lands to London, where merchants easily exploit price discovery and arbitrage opportunities with head rights tied to "transportation"). The second provides in excruciating detail the evolution of propaganda employed by the psychotic protector (and privy think tanks) to exploit alliances between Holland, France, and Spain to splice the western hemisphere; introducing mobile "new Jerusalem" hither and yon.

Amidst the many recurring cameo appearances by purportedly enlightened philosophers and "founding fathers" who endorse this or that policy in this or that phase of degenerate dynasties, my favorite note by the author is this persisting truth (seconded by Holland: "for amity with that people would make those two common wealths intire masters of the whole ocean").

A council meeting on the next day apparently discussed plans for a strike against Spain's American possessions, soon to be called 'the Western design'.19 Since the government had '16o sayle of shipps well appointed swimminge at sea', it seemed necessary to use them 'in some advantageous designe' rather than lay up valuable forces. Accordingly, with scant regard for past alliances or historic antagonisms, the discussion turned on whether to attack France or Spain. Spain seemed the more viable prize, as an enemy to the protestant nation and as the seemingly enfeebled guardian of rich treasure ripe for the picking. Thereby the design could be sold as 'more acceptable to the people of all sorts and the Parliament then any can be'.