Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.

Corbyn's Moment of Truth

by Frank Schnittger Sat May 4th, 2019 at 10:57:34 AM EST

Long after the scale of the Conservative defeat in the 2019 Local elections had become clear the BBC was still running with the headline that the elections were a disaster for the major parties and that the Conservatives and Labour had "lost hundred of seats". The reality is that the Conservatives lost 1,334 seats and Labour just 82 compared to the 2015 results.

But there is a sense in which the BBC has (perhaps inadvertently) actually got it right. In 2015 the local elections had been run in parallel with the general election in which Cameron had won an unexpected overall majority. So the Labour performance is actually slightly worse than on a day in 2015 when the Tories won an overall majority and unleashed the joys of untrammelled Conservative rule (including the Brexit referendum) on the nation.

Yes, there are other lessons to be drawn. The Tory performance was the worst since 1995 and the halcyon days of Tony Blair. UKIP lost 145 out of its 176 Councillors. The Lib Dems gained 703 seats, the best performance in their history, and the Greens gained 194 seats putting them on the map as a significant force in UK politics for the first time. So between them the major Leave parties lost almost 1,500 seats while the main committed Remain parties gained almost 900.

But the lesson Conservative and Labour leaders appear to have drawn from this resounding defeat is that "the people want them to get on with delivering Brexit". Labour has managed to allow itself to become contaminated in the public mind with the gridlock in Westminster and tarred with the same brush as the Conservatives. That is a massive failure of leadership on the Labour side.

The British Establishment likes to paint Corbyn as some kind of firebrand, "looney left" extremist, leading the hardcore revolutionary Trotskyite Momentum wing of the Labour party. The reality couldn't be more different. Corbyn supported the establishment line and campaigned for Remain in the Brexit referendum. He then dutifully accepted the referendum result and began to craft the establishment response - a soft, almost Brexit in Name Only Brexit, where the UK retained a close relationship with the Single Market and Customs Union.

If Labour had been in power, that is where we would be now.

Instead, we got Theresa May, who pursued a hard core Brexit outside the Single Market and Customs Union in line with the far right ERG wing of the Tory party. Her January 2017 Lancaster House speech set out the parameters of what became the withdrawal agreement with the EU. She triggered Article 50 in March 2017 without the slightest attempt to "reach across the aisle" and build a wider consensus as to what "Brexit means Brexit" actually meant.

When the electorate rejected her vision in the June 2017 general election, she turned to the hard core protestant fundamentalists and rejectionists of the DUP to shore up her position. When even some "one nation" Tories rebelled she just doubled down and then doubled down some more on her hard line positions, seeking to use the spectre of a "no deal" Brexit to force submission to her will. Only when it became absolutely clear that Parliament wouldn't support her deal did she ask the EU for an Article 50 extension and turn to Jeremy Corbyn for support.

Having been demonised by the establishment for so long, Corbyn probably felt the need to adopt a "statesmanlike" pose and agreed to discuss a compromise Brexit somewhere between May's hard line and Labour's softer Brexit approach. But for the English electorate (minus London) as a whole, this was a case of too little, too late. Fed up with almost three years of wrangling, voters pronounced "a plague on both your houses" and turned to the Lib Dems, Greens and a plethora of independents to represent them on local councils.

The one party they did NOT turn to is UKIP which lost almost all it seats, so the notion that the popular anti-establishment discontent was a mandate for a hard core no deal Brexit is absurd. Obviously the European Elections will be a different test of opinion, more explicitly about Brexit and Brexit alone, and crucially Nigel Farage's new Brexit party and ChangeUK will provide additional outlets for Leavers and Remainers discontented with the major parties policies and performances on Brexit.

The Brexit party is polling up to 30% at the moment, and is threatening to relegate the Conservatives (on 13%) to third or fourth place in the UK party hierarchy. However the performance of the Labour party, in the low 20's, is nothing to write home about, and the prospect of coming second to Nigel Farage must be concentrating minds in the party leadership wonderfully. If the Lib Dems build on their local elections surge, Labour could even come third in the polls.

It will be little consolation to Labour activists if the Conservatives are absolutely destroyed in the Euro elections if Labour, too, is eclipsed by the Brexit party. So what must Corbyn do now?

Up until now he has been the model party leader accepting the development of Labour policy through the correct channels of the party conference and national executive. Although portrayed as a dictator by his detractors, he has tried, increasingly desperately, to keep both Leave and Remain voters in his party on board by a policy of "constructive ambiguity" on a second referendum, and almost complete silence on what he would campaign for if such a referendum were actually called.

But there now seems to be a widespread consensus across both Labour and non labour activists that the Local Elections results mean that that strategy has run out of road. The Euro elections will present voters with a binary choice between the Brexit supporting Brexit, Conservative, and UKIP parties; and the Remain supporting Lib Dem, Green and Change UK parties, and Labour risk being caught in no man's land in the middle.

The ongoing Conservative Labour talks risk further contaminating the Labour party with the failures of the Conservative/DUP government and any prospect of Labour "bailing out" a collapsing Conservative Government (which will probably soon have a "no deal" hard core Brexiteer leader) must be anathema to Labour supporters - Leavers and Remainers alike.

The reality is that the public has changed their minds on Brexit with a 14% majority now in favour of Remain and with an over 50% majority of Labour supporters living in north of England and midlands supporting Remain over Leave. So the time has come for Corbyn to rise above a narrow procedural interpretation of his role and do what the majority of the UK electorate actually want, and that is to take the lead role for arguing for Remain in the forthcoming Euro elections.

Many have argued that Corbyn is a life long Eurosceptic and that he would never argue for Remain with any enthusiasm. But that is to ignore his procedural correctness in always articulating what he considers to be his democratic mandate from the UK peoples and the Labour party membership.

What he needs to do, perhaps for the first time in his leadership, is actually take a leadership position advocating for a policy which is a development of the policies previously approved by the UK electorate and Labour decision making bodies: He needs to argue that circumstances have changed; that the Tories have negotiated a very bad Brexit deal, and that all efforts by Labour to rescue it have failed. He needs to argue that the time has come for a second referendum and that Labour will advocate for Remain when that referendum is called.

Anything less will allow the Lib Dems, Greens and ChangeUK to dominate Remain discourse and support and relegate Labour to a minor place in the popular vote.

There is no shame in admitting that attempts to forge a consensus on Brexit have failed, and it is important that Theresa May should be allowed to own that failure. Part of the popular frustration with Corbyn is that he appears to act as an apparatchik within the Labour party organisational structure and does not speak directly to and for the UK peoples as a whole.

Labour's prospects of winning the next general election and Corbyn's prospects of ever being seen as a credible Prime Ministerial candidate depend on his ability to be seen as able to lead his party and the country in a new policy direction. Ever since Blair lost the plot and committed the party to the invasion of Iraq against the wishes of the vast majority of the party (and peoples of the UK) there has been a fear in Labour of another party leader becoming obsessed with his own ego and acting in a dictatorial style.

Corbyn has now served as Labour leader long enough to have gained the trust of the vast majority of its membership that he will only act in their best interests. If he needs to call an extraordinary Party conference to validate his new policy, then by all means let him do so. But in the meantime, and for the purposes of the Euro elections, he has to take his party forward firmly in a Remain direction if Labour is to secure its position as the leading party in the country and the next government in waiting.

The real question mark over Corbyn is not his economic ideology or democratic credentials. It is whether he has the leadership abilities to pull Labour and the UK out of this mess.

But does Corbyn have those abilities and will he use them? Time is short.

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sat May 4th, 2019 at 06:47:52 PM EST
We will know in the next few weeks...

Index of Frank's Diaries
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Sat May 4th, 2019 at 07:29:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, let us define "abilities": Which abilities are personal and which are collective, that is performed by a group of people or accrued by their agreement, to which one ascribes "leadership".

Is Corbyn's purported leadership obtained in part or in whole in concert with Labour members ("the party"): From what or whom does that authority derive after all.

This article contemplates only personality and personalty, as opinion and electoral polling results are so construed. Oddly, force of legal effect, entitled by offices of group by-laws, UK gov, and parliament are excluded from that slate of criteria.

Diverging political priorities of "the party" members in the three kingdoms as well as offical and unofficial territorial dependencies on UK gov have here been duly if scantily noted. Let us note further, even less upon the real "estate" and value of "Corbyn's" economic accomplishments survives remark.

How, for example, does Corbyn's voting record demonstrate those leadership abilities, inter alia, to distribute "the party" governance and industrial policy among several constituencies? How does this demonstrable ability apply to effective rule of parliamentary and legislative agenda?

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Sat May 4th, 2019 at 07:47:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
How will he campaign for remain if his heart's not in it?
He's obviously no fibreless opportunist.
Interestingly ironic dilemna. Convoluted times calling for convoluted logic?
Excellent summation, Frank.
He has been handed a ticking social time bomb wrapped in Tory blue ribbon.

'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Sat May 4th, 2019 at 10:17:57 PM EST
The Lib Dem surge is real. But Brexit isn't the only story of the local elections | The Guardian Opinion |


Some of the pattern of the swing may reflect those "local peculiarities" that make local elections so interesting. While each council is its own political environment, there are some common features. Labour has run most of the metropolitan borough councils for a very long time. Councils by their nature tend to do unpopular things, and local grievances will accumulate. The period since 2010 has been particularly tough for councils because of the harsh spending cuts that they have suffered from central government - "outsourcing austerity", as councillors describe it. There have been a lot of painful cuts, and a slow deterioration in the public realm. Labour's traditional voters notice and give their councils a share of the blame.

It is significant that Labour's best metropolitan result came in Trafford, where the party had only run the borough since the 2018 elections, having ejected a long-serving Conservative council. Locally, Labour still had the benefit of being the party of change.

Similarly on the Conservative side, Tory councils get stale and unpopular, and unlike Labour councils cannot blame central government for austerity. Particularly in the south-east, they are also under pressure to build housing, which stimulates environmental and nimby objections that Resident parties - and Lib Dems - can easily convert into political opposition.

Lib Dem: The democratic case for resolving Brexit

Global Warming - distance between America and Europe is steadily increasing.

by Oui on Sun May 5th, 2019 at 08:15:55 AM EST
Well, what do these elections really tell us? Labour's waffling stance on Brexit is not a winner among the most politically plucked in in some parts (a third?) of the country. But we more or less knew this coming in. For Labour to prosper they need the discussion to be about austerity and social transformation, and they need to mobilize a large number of people. So while the results suggest that Labour's Brexit stance is becoming increasingly costly, they don't readily suggest a solution. After all, it is very unlikely that a strong Remain stance would have pulled in Tories jumping ship. And unless I'm misreading, Tory -> LibDem was the big move this election.
In conclusion, I wouldn't put any hope in elections to push Labour into a hard Remain position. The membership still might.
by generic on Tue May 7th, 2019 at 09:42:58 AM EST
In other Irish news:

by Bernard on Wed May 8th, 2019 at 12:18:43 PM EST
Does this mean that Ireland will switch to using European sockets instead of the English ones?
by gk (gk (gk quattro due due sette @gmail.com)) on Wed May 8th, 2019 at 12:22:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
NEVER! It would be like expecting us to switch to driving on the right side of the road...

Index of Frank's Diaries
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Wed May 8th, 2019 at 09:35:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
PM May in the House of Commons today: Brilliance of Liverpool contagious, which Liverpool?
Yesterday's was Made In Germany by Jürgen Klopp ... or the famous game of manager Shankly in Amsterdam against Ajax and a young player named Cruijff?

Theresa May: I can make a Liverpool-style comeback in Europe - video

Theresa May has compared herself to Liverpool football club in predicting she could make a remarkable comeback on Brexit even though Europe is winning and the clock is ticking.

Corbyn paid tribute to Manchester City for their Women's FA Cup triumph before joking: "In view of the amazing performance of Liverpool last night, perhaps the prime minister could take some tips from Jürgen Klopp on how to get a good result in Europe."

Global Warming - distance between America and Europe is steadily increasing.
by Oui on Wed May 8th, 2019 at 04:34:51 PM EST
The birth of Ajax and Total Football ... the era of winning three European Cups in succession.

The Fog Game - Dec. 7, 1966

When we talk Classic Games, many many candidates come to mind. But this particular one is the Mother of All Classic Games! Johan Cruyff calls it his favorite match ever. And looking back, this 1966 game between the Champs of England (and probably one of the best teams in the world, back then) and Ajax can be called the birth of Dutch Total Football, culminating in Oranje's demonstration in 1974.


Right winger Sjaak Swart: "It was a fairytale, no one believed it actually happened."

Rinus Michels was hired as Ajax' coach in 1965. The season before, Ajax almost got relegated. Never before performed Ajax that bad. In Michels second year, Ajax wins it's first European game against Besiktas and Liverpool comes out of the draw for the second round. Ajax normally would be too light for those teams (Benfica and Real Madrid are two other contenders) but under the inexperienced but tough Michels, the team starts to settle and find it's rhythm.

But England won the World Cup that year and Liverpool is the fave for the title in the European Cup. Still, the gutsy Amsterdam rebels feel that something is possible.


After the match, Bill Shankly isn't fussed. "I wasn't too impressed with Ajax. They got lucky. Next week in Liverpool we'll beat them 7-0."

Ajax prepares well for the return. Bill Shankly, meanwhile, starts playing his mindgames. He tells the press: "Ajax got lucky. That goalie, Gert Bals, wouldn't even play in our amateur teams. They're in for a hot night and their physio better bring heaps of stretchers."

Ton Pronk: "His words did have effect. Shankly made it seem as if our win was an anomaly. So, we were motivated to the teeth."

Rinus Michels knows about the magic of Anfield and the power of the fans' singing. To help his players get accustomed, he sends them onto the pitch really early. So they could get used to the atmosphere. Sjaak Swart: "I will never forget that. There we were. Alone on the pitch, facing The Kop. And they all started singing You'll Never Walk Alone. I'd never heard that song, but I got goosebumps. I've always been a Liverpool follower since."

[In Liverpool a very talented Johan Cruijff scored two goals and the home crowd was silenced ... after the match (2-2) Shankly entered the Ajax dressing room to shake the hands of each individual player saying: "The war is over, you won."]

Global Warming - distance between America and Europe is steadily increasing.
by Oui on Wed May 8th, 2019 at 07:01:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I have long since stopped following football, but for Cruyff then, and Messi now, I would make an exception...

Index of Frank's Diaries
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Wed May 8th, 2019 at 09:33:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't have cable tv nor a decoder for pay as You watch. In Holland I believe the football rights were bought by Fox Sports ...

I follow news programs on free satellite stations. More than enough and it includes Al Jazeera, Presstv Iran, Israel, Emirates, RT and the western state propaganda stations 😉

Football is not my sport due to multi-millionaires, etc. Ronaldo of Juventus had a higher price tag than complete team of Ajax.

Global Warming - distance between America and Europe is steadily increasing.

by Oui on Wed May 8th, 2019 at 10:10:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
TM would not be that bad

by das monde on Thu May 9th, 2019 at 01:26:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Given the team she has... Piss-poor to start with, and decimated by (self-inflicted) injuries, she needs to pick up some foreign talent in the mercato...

Speaking of which : in the 16-goal extravaganza that saw 4 English teams through to the European finals, how many goals were scored by English players?

Apparently the answer is one...

It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II

by eurogreen on Fri May 10th, 2019 at 02:14:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

by generic on Thu May 9th, 2019 at 11:16:13 AM EST

Leaving yet expecting to retain all the benefits of membership.

by generic on Thu May 9th, 2019 at 05:55:15 PM EST

Brexit means Brexit?
by generic on Wed May 15th, 2019 at 12:16:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

by generic on Fri May 17th, 2019 at 10:16:46 AM EST

Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]